Osteotomy of the 1st Metatarsal for Hallux Valgus Using Pneumatic Oscillating Saw or Piezoelectric Scalpel
Piezo-Hallux
Piezoelectric Tools Versus Traditional Oscillating Saw for Distal Linear Osteotomy in Hallux Valgus Correction: a Prospective, Triple-blinded, Randomized Controlled Study.
1 other identifier
interventional
34
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The main goal of the surgical correction of the hallux valgus is the morphological correction associated with the functional rebalancing of the first ray. The aim of this study was to show the efficacy of piezosurgery in performing distal linear osteotomy of the first metatarsal bone in hallux valgus correction, in terms of clinical and radiological outcomes at 1-year final follow up.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 24, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 27, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 27, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 28, 2020
CompletedMay 15, 2023
April 1, 2020
2.5 years
April 23, 2020
May 11, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
23/5000 Radiographic healing. Patients underwent several radiographic checks, pre-operatively and follow-ups, in order to analyze the healing changes in the osteotomy of 1 metatarsus
The patients underwent radiographic control (foot in two projections under load) preoperatively and at 21-35-50-70-90-180-360 days of follow up from the surgery. The radiographs obtained were evaluated by an independent radiologist, always the same for the duration of the study, who was not aware of the type of instrument used during the surgery. His task was to evaluate at what time of follow-up the radiographic consolidation of the osteotomy was achieved.
Preoperative, 21-35-50-70-90-180-360 days of follow up from the surgery
Secondary Outcomes (2)
AOFAs metatarsophalangeal (MTP)-interphalangeal (IP)- American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle score. The questionnaire was administered pre-operatively and to some follow-ups in order to evaluate the changes in the patient's clinic.
Preoperative, 90-180-360 days of follow up from the surgery
VAS - Visual Analogue Scale. The questionnaire was administered pre-operatively and to some follow-ups in order to evaluate the changes in the patient's clinic.
Preoperative, 90-180-360 days of follow up from the surgery
Study Arms (2)
Oscillating saw
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients treated for hallux valgus with 1st metatarsal osteotomy obtained by common oscillating saw
Piezoelectric tool
EXPERIMENTALPatients treated for hallux valgus with 1st metatarsal osteotomy obtained by piezoelectric tool
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-80
- Mild to moderate hallux valgus (Hallux valgus Angle \<; 40° and Intermetatarsal Angle \< 20°),
- No osteoarthritis or grade 1 osteoarthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPj) according to Regnauld grading
You may not qualify if:
- Stiffness of the first MTPj or osteoarthritis ≥ grade 2 according to Regnauld's classification
- Rheumatoid arthritis or other chronic inflammatory joint diseases
- Diabetes
- Neurological disorders
- Previous hallux valgus surgical corrections
- Hypermobility of the first MTPj as per congenital laxity syndromes.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alessandro Russo, MD
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The patient did not know with which instrument the osteotomy had been performed. The radiologist who certifies the osteotomy radiographic healing did not know with which instrument the osteotomy had been performed. The clinical investigator who collected the evaluation questionnaires was not aware of the type of instruments used during the surgery.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2020
First Posted
April 28, 2020
Study Start
October 24, 2014
Primary Completion
April 27, 2017
Study Completion
April 27, 2018
Last Updated
May 15, 2023
Record last verified: 2020-04