NCT03812185

Brief Summary

With using suction tube attached TEE probe cover, we will assess its pinpoint suction capacity on image quality and surgical decision making.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
53

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2019

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 18, 2019

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 23, 2019

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 14, 2019

Completed
17 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2019

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 13, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

December 13, 2023

Status Verified

November 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

January 18, 2019

Results QC Date

January 26, 2022

Last Update Submit

November 22, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Image Quality Assessment Method#1: Difference in Likert Scale Before/After Suctioning

    Difference in image quality assessment by Likert scale before/after suctioning, by assessing quality of images stored before/after suctioning. Investigators categorized the quality of all acquired images on a numeric scale (the higher number means higher image quality) based on each investigator's impression (1: very poor, 2: poor, 3: acceptable, 4: good, and 5: very good). Image quality improvement was determined by increased number. Three investigators (A, B, C) assessed the quality of all TEE image sets (i.e. before and after suctioning) post hoc. The acquired numeric scales were combined, and compared before and after suctioning, and calculated how much percentage of patients had improved image quality (i.e. increase in numeric scale), same quality (i.e. same numeric scale), and worsened image quality (i.e. decrease in numeric scale)

    TEE image sets were acquired after general anesthesia induction (before suctioning) and after 10minutes (after suctioning), and the outcome was the difference in image quality. In 6-8 months, investigator C did the same analysis on the same images.

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Reproducibility of the LV FAC (Inter-observer)

    Images were acquired after general anesthesia induction (before suctioning) and after 10minutes (after suctioning images).

  • Reproducibility of the LV FAC (Intra-observer)

    6-8 months after initial images obtained during surgery.

  • Reproducibility of the RV FAC (Inter-observer)

    Images were acquired after general anesthesia induction (before suctioning) and after 10minutes (after suctioning).

  • Reproducibility of the RV FAC (Intra-observer)

    6-8 months after initial images obtained during surgery.

Study Arms (1)

TEE image before and after suctioning orogastric tube

OTHER

for intraoperative TEE used cardiac or transplant cases, TEE images will be stored before and after suctioning orogastric tube which is attached to TEE probe cover. This Arm is TEE image BEFORE suctioning.

Device: Suctioning orogastric tube which is attached to TEE probe cover

Interventions

Suctioning orogastric tube which is atttached to TEE probe cover.

TEE image before and after suctioning orogastric tube

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

HFHS

Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States

Location

Results Point of Contact

Title
Yoshihisa Morita
Organization
Henry Ford Health System

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
Since this is a single group study, participant, care provider, and investigator will NOT be masked. However, outcome assessor (who assess image quality and perform measurement using stored TEE images) will be masked
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: For intraoperative TEE used cardiac or transplant cases, investigators will compare TEE image quality before and after suctioning using orogastric tube attached TEE probe cover
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal INvestigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2019

First Posted

January 23, 2019

Study Start

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion

December 14, 2019

Study Completion

December 31, 2019

Last Updated

December 13, 2023

Results First Posted

December 13, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-11

Locations