Pedometers and Walking Tests for Pulmonary Hypertension Patients
HTAPODO
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Concordance between walking tests and pedometer data may seem like a logical outcome for pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients. However, many individuals have discordant results: results much worse or better during an in-hospital walking test as compared to real life activity. The primary objective of this study is: to determine variables associated with discordance between the distance walked during an in-hospital 6-minute walking test (6MWT) and the average distance travelled per day (observed over a period of 28 days (2 Ă— 14 days) using a pedometer) among PH patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 17, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 18, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 21, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 21, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 21, 2024
CompletedSeptember 8, 2023
September 1, 2023
5.3 years
January 17, 2019
September 7, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The patient's discordance category as precisely defined here:
Linear regression is performed for the distance walked during an initial 6 minute walking test (6MWT) and the average distance walked per day according to the pedometer intervention. The residuals from this regression will determine categories: Category 1 (pedometer high): the 25% of subjects not in category 2 and with higher values for pedometer data Category 2 (concordance): the 50% of included subjects with the smallest residuals in terms of absolute value. Category 3 (6MWT high): the 25% of subjects not in category 2 and with higher values for 6MWT data
74 days
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Health related quality of life questionnaire (the Medical Outcome Study - Short Form (SF36))
Day 0
Health related quality of life questionnaire (the Medical Outcome Study - Short Form (SF36))
Month 3
Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale
Day 0
Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale
Month 3
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire
Day 0
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
The study population
EXPERIMENTALThe study population as described by eligibility criteria. Intervention: 6 minute walking test Intervention: pedometer
Interventions
A pedometer will be worn by the patient at home for days 1 to 14 and 60 to 74.
Performed according to current recommendations during routine visits (baseline and \~90 days for the purposes of this study).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient with idiopathic pulmonary hypertension (PH), familial PH, or PH associated with various pathologies (groups I to IV of the international classification)
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) severity classes II to IV
- Incident cases, or prevalent cases with stable disease over the last 3 months
- Collection of informed written consent
- Affiliation with or beneficiary of a social security program (health insurance)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients protected or unable to give consent according to Article L1121-8 of the French Public Health Code (CSP)
- Pregnant or lactating women according to article L1121-5 of the CSP
- Vulnerable persons according to article L1121-6 of the CSP
- Simultaneous participation in any other research protocol
- It is impossible to correctly inform the patient (language barrier, etc.)
- The patient has already been included in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital
Montpellier, 34295, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Arnaud Bourdin, MD, PhD
University Hospitals of Monpellier
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2019
First Posted
January 18, 2019
Study Start
March 21, 2019
Primary Completion
June 21, 2024
Study Completion
June 21, 2024
Last Updated
September 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share