Aprepitant Versus Hydroxyzine in Persistent Aquagenic Pruritus for Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
APHYPAP
2 other identifiers
interventional
63
1 country
11
Brief Summary
Phase 3, randomized prospective study, double blind-double placebo, testing oral therapies APREPITANT versus HYDROXYZINE in patients followed for myeloproliferative neoplasms and suffering of persistent aquagenic pruritus.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Apr 2019
Longer than P75 for phase_3
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 26, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 18, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 16, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 22, 2024
CompletedDecember 3, 2025
August 1, 2024
4.4 years
September 26, 2018
November 26, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reduction of pruritus intensity below (or equal) 3/10 on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale )
number of patients with a pruritus intensity below (or equal) 3/10 on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale wich measure the intensity of symptoms of pruritus, 0 is minimum and 10 is maximum intensity of symptoms)
at 15 days
Secondary Outcomes (22)
Reduction of pruritus intensity below (or equal) 3/10 on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale )
at 60 days
Cessation of pruritus
at 15 days
Cessation of pruritus
at 60 days
Time observed to decreased the VAS to 3/10
01 to 60 days
Duration of treatment effectiveness
1 to 60 days
- +17 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
studied group
EXPERIMENTALAprepitant 80 mg daily - 14 days Plus placebo of Hydroxyzine - 14 days
comparative group
ACTIVE COMPARATORHydroxyzine 25 mg/d - 14 days Plus placebo of Aprepitant - 14 days
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Major patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythaemia or myelofibrosis)
- and treated with hydroxyurea, pipobroman, anagrelide, α2a pegylated interferon, ruxolitinib or bled for more than 6 months
- and suffering of persistent aquagenic pruritus
- and with a pruritus intensity on Analogic Visual Scale \>5/10
- patients who gave their written consent for participation in the study
You may not qualify if:
- patients with a physical or psychological disability to sign the consent form
- patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms and suffering of aquagenic pruritus but only treated by aspirin
- patients already included in another therapeutic protocol
- patients with diffuse dermatological disease where pruritus may be present (psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, prurigo
- patients already on anti-anxiety and / or anti-depressant treatment
- patients with absolute contraindications to the use of Aprepitant or Hydroxyzine
- hypersensitivity to Aprepitant and / or Hydroxyzine or to any of their excipients
- lactose intolerance
- pregnant or lactating women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (11)
CHRU de Brest - Hôpital Morvan
Brest, Brest Cedex, 29609, France
Centre Hospitalier de Cornouaille
Quimper, Quimper, 29107, France
CHU d'Angers
Angers, 49933, France
CHU de Caen
Caen, 14033, France
Centre Hospitalier de Douarnenez
Douarnenez, 29171, France
CHU Grenoble Alpes
Grenoble, 38043, France
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon, 69373, France
Centre Hospitalier des Pays de Morlaix
Morlaix, 29672, France
CHU de Nantes
Nantes, 44093, France
Hôpital Pontchaillou
Rennes, France
Hôpital Yves Le Foll
Saint-Brieuc, 22027, France
Related Publications (1)
Le Gall-Ianotto C, Verdet R, Nowak E, Le Roux L, Gasse A, Fiedler A, Carlhant-Kowalski D, Marcorelles P, Misery L, Ianotto JC. Rationale and design of the multicentric, double-blind, double-placebo, randomized trial APrepitant versus HYdroxyzine in association with cytoreductive treatments for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasia suffering from Persistent Aquagenic Pruritus. Trial acronym: APHYPAP. Trials. 2021 Dec 19;22(1):938. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05864-8.
PMID: 34923994DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jean-Christophe IANOTTO, MD, PhD
Hématologie Clinique-Institut de Cancéro-Hématologie
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 26, 2018
First Posted
January 18, 2019
Study Start
April 16, 2019
Primary Completion
September 1, 2023
Study Completion
August 22, 2024
Last Updated
December 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-08