Primary Thrombocythaemia 1 Trial
PT-1
A Randomised Trial to Compare Aspirin vs Hydroxyurea/Aspirin in 'Intermediate Risk' Primary Thrombocythaemia and Aspirin Only With Observation in 'Low Risk'Primary Thrombocythaemia
3 other identifiers
interventional
1,398
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this trial is to see if Hydroxyurea + aspirin is a better treatment than aspirin alone for Intermediate Risk Primary Thrombocythemia (PT) patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 1997
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 1997
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 9, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2016
CompletedJanuary 18, 2017
January 1, 2017
19.4 years
September 9, 2005
January 17, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Does hydroxyurea reduce thrombosis and major haemorrhage when added to aspirin?
Reducing thrombosis and major haemorrhage are specific key measurements in this group of patients for whom thrombotic events are very likely to occur.
14 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Does treatment modality alter the risk of leukaemic or myelofibrotic transformation?
14 years
Study Arms (2)
Intermediate risk group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntermediate risk patients are randomised to a either a group receiving Aspirin only, or a group receiving both Hydroxyurea and Aspirin.
Low risk group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients are given Aspirin only with observation.
Interventions
Hydroxyurea (or hydroxycarbamide) is an antineoplastic drug commonly used to treat haematological malignancies.
Aspirin is an anti-aggregating agent, and has been shown to reduce/alleviate minor ischaemic symptoms.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The diagnostic criteria for primary thrombocythaemia are:
- Platelet count \> 600x109/l.
- No evidence of overt polycythaemia(confirmed by RCM if necessary)or of polycythaemia masked by co-existent iron deficiency.
- No Philadelphia chromosome.
- Absence of peripheral blood and/or marrow appearances of myelodysplasia, or myelofibrosis.
- No known cause of reactive thrombocytosis. Particular care should be taken to exclude iron deficiency in pre-menopausal women.
- Notes:
- In asymptomatic patients, the platelet count should be observed for a period of at least 2 months to confirm \>600x109/l, and to allow any cause of reactive thrombocytosis to become overt.
- If the PCV is above normal upper limit (that is, males \>0.51, females \>0.48) or in high normal range in a patient with palpable splenomegaly measure RCM. Iron deficient primary polycythaemia (polycythaemia vera) is strongly suggested if Hb/PCV is normal in the presence of iron deficient red cell changes. In this situation, iron therapy is potentially dangerous.
- Exceeding rarely, bcr-abl positive Philadelphia chromosome negative patients present with high platelet counts with little or no elevation in WBC count. The features that suggest it is necessary to examine for bcr-abl, are:- basophilia, left-shift in WBC, granulocyte count \>16x109/l, difficulty in controlling platelet count, megakaryocytes of low ploidy (NAP is usually unhelpful).
- A normal ESR, CRP or plasma viscosity is useful in excluding a reactive thrombocytosis.
- Written informed consent obtained in accordance with NCRI requirements.
- Patients with impaired hepatic / renal function are not excluded although the respective biochemical tests should be monitored during therapy and reduced doses of cytoreductive agent should be used, particularly in the case of hydroxyurea and renal dysfunction.
You may not qualify if:
- High risk features (any of the following):
- Age \>or= 60 years
- Platelet count \> or= 1500x109/l (current or previous) (a)
- History of ischaemia, thrombosis or embolic events (including erythromelalgia) (b)
- Haemorrhage considered to be related to PT (b)
- Presence of hypertension (c)or diabetes (d)
- The manufacturers of hydroxyurea state that it should be avoided in pregnancy and in lactating women. Similarly, hydroxyurea should not be prescribed for women when there is doubt about their use of an effective contraceptive method.
- Exclude patient from hydroxyurea therapy and, therefore, from the 'intermediate' risk randomisation if the patient has current leg ulcers.
- Notes on the definition of high risk:
- In patients with borderline counts the allocation of a patient to a high risk group based on platelet count alone should rely on at least three samples taken on separate occasions over at least 2 months.
- Documentation of previous thrombo-embolic, ischaemic and haemorrhagic events should be given on the patient's entry proforma.
- Hypertension is defined as those patients requiring hypotensive therapy.
- Diabetes is defined as those patients requiring therapy with a hypoglycaemic agent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge, Cambs, CB2 2QQ, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Godfrey AL, Campbell PJ, MacLean C, Buck G, Cook J, Temple J, Wilkins BS, Wheatley K, Nangalia J, Grinfeld J, McMullin MF, Forsyth C, Kiladjian JJ, Green AR, Harrison CN; United Kingdom Medical Research Council Primary Thrombocythemia-1 Study; United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Subgroup; French Intergroup of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms; the Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group.. Hydroxycarbamide Plus Aspirin Versus Aspirin Alone in Patients With Essential Thrombocythemia Age 40 to 59 Years Without High-Risk Features. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Dec 1;36(34):3361-3369. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.8414. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
PMID: 30153096DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Anthony R Green, Prof
Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Claire Harrison, Dr
St Thomas' Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Haemato-Oncology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 9, 2005
First Posted
September 15, 2005
Study Start
July 1, 1997
Primary Completion
November 1, 2016
Study Completion
November 1, 2016
Last Updated
January 18, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01