Erector Spinae Plane Block for Peroperative Analgesia and Intraabdominal Tissue Oxygenation
ESPB
The Evaluation of Ultrasonography-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Perioperative Analgesia and Intraabdominal Tissue Oxygenation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
49
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Brief summary: Regional anesthesia decreases the need for intravenous analgesia in the peri-operative period. Erector spinae plane (ESP) is a regional anesthesia technique shown to be effective at the dorsal and ventral rami of the thoracic spinal nerve along with sympathetic nerve fibers. The purpose is to demonstrate the contribution of ESP block to the postoperative analgesia by ultrasonography and to increase intraabdominal tissue oxygenation compared to the control group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 13, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 17, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 18, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 12, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 20, 2019
CompletedMarch 20, 2020
March 1, 2020
3 months
December 13, 2018
March 19, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
FLACC scale
FLACC scale was used. The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale (FLACC) scale was a measurement used to assess pain for children between the ages of 6 months and 2 years or individuals that are unable to communicate their pain. The scale is scored in a range of 0-10 with 0 representing no pain. The scale has five criteria, which are each assigned a score of 0, 1 or 2.
From recovery of anesthesia to end of study ( postoperative 24 hours)
NIRS
INVOS ;Somatic Corp, Troy, Mic sensors placed in surgical side of patients was used to detect peripheral perfusion and oxygen delivery (rSo2)
Before anesthesia induction to end of operation ( intraoperative 2 hours )
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Time to first analgesic drug
first 24 hour
Need for analgesic
first 24 hour
Study Arms (2)
ESP Group: Bupivacaine and lidocaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORESP Group: Bupivacaine and lidocaine: Erector Spinae Plane Block : (1: 1 ratio of 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.4 ml / kg of 1% lidocaine) was administered.
control group
NO INTERVENTIONControl Group:
Interventions
ESP block was administered under general anesthesia before the surgery. Patients with ESP block, 1: 1 ratio of 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.4 ml / kg of 1% lidocaine
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children aged 6 months to 2 years
- According to American Anesthesia Society Anesthesia Risk Scale ASA I-II class patients
- Patients with lower abdominal surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Children under 6 months and older than 2 years
- According to American Anesthesia Society Anesthesia Risk Scale Patients with ASA III-IV class
- Patients with contraindication to regional anesthesia
- Patients with a history of local anesthetic allergy
- Patients with abnormal coagulation profile
- Patients with infection at the injection site
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Parvin Pinar
Istanbul, 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
PARVIN PINAR
BEZMİALEM VAKIF UNIVERSITY
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- As the patients were under 18 years of age, the details of the procedure were explained to their parents and their consent was obtained. However, the patients were not included in the group. And also outcomes assessor staff were not aware of medication assignment.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 13, 2018
First Posted
January 17, 2019
Study Start
January 18, 2019
Primary Completion
April 12, 2019
Study Completion
April 20, 2019
Last Updated
March 20, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03