Study Stopped
Slow enrolment process and COVID situation worsened the situation. SIFI has developed a new product with probably a better performance. SIFI changed its marketing strategy and decided that Eyestil® Protection will be not marketed anymore
To Demonstrate the Non-inferiority of Eyestil Protection® Compared to Vismed® in Terms of Clinical Performance
A Prospective Multicenter, Comparative, Randomized, Single-blind, Non-inferiority Study of Eyestil Protection® Unidose Versus Vismed® Unidose in Patients With Moderate to Severe Dry Eye Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
21
2 countries
11
Brief Summary
This is a national, prospective, multicenter, comparative, randomized, single-blinded non-inferiority study performed in two parallel groups. 3 months (plus a run in period of 15 days prior inclusion) Patients with moderate to severe dry eye syndrome.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2019
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 15, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 8, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2020
CompletedMay 9, 2022
May 1, 2022
12 months
December 10, 2018
May 6, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary endpoint/clinical performance by Oxford scale
Clinical performance of the medical device under investigation: the between-group comparison of the average variation of the global fluorescein corneal and lissamine green conjunctival staining using the Oxford scale (0 to 15). This refers to the average variation between both time points of the Global Ocular Staining Score of the study eye (GOSS). 0-5 cornea; 0-5 temporal conjuctiva; 0-5 nasal conjunctiva. Max total score: 15
between Day 1 and Day 35 ±4.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Secondary endpoint/clinical performance by TBUT test
between Day 1 and Day 35 ±4 and Day 1 and Day 84 ±7
Secondary endpoint/patient reported outcome by DEQS questionnaire
between Day 1 and Day 35 ±4 and Day 1 and Day 84 ±7
Secondary endpoint/safety
between Day 1 and Day 84 ±7
Secondary endpoint/clinical performance by Oxford scale
between Day 1 and Day 84 ±7
Secondary endpoint/clinical performance by Schirmer test
between [Day 1 and Day 84 ±7]
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Investigator's overall treatment satisfaction (PRO)
at [Day 35±4 and Day 84 ±7].
Study Arms (2)
Arm A Eyestil Protection®
EXPERIMENTALNo inferiority of Eyestil Protection® unidose versus Vismed® unidose The intervention consists of Eyestil Protection® : sterile preservative free, medical device, class IIa and CE marked. It contains 0.2% xanthan gum, presented in 0.3 ml unidose containers. It is not available yet on the French Market. dosage: 6 drops a day for three months period.
Arm B Vismed®
NO INTERVENTIONVismed®: sterile preservative free, medical device class IIb and CE marked. It contains 0.18% sodium hyaluronate, presented in 0.3 ml unidose containers. It is already on the French market. dosage: 6 drops a day for three months period.
Interventions
to demonstrate the non-inferiority of Eyestil Protection® in terms of performance and safety, when compared to Vismed® in treatment of dry eye disease.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients, male or female, of at least 18 years of age at the screening visit
- Patients understanding the study, willing to follow the instructions and providing their written Informed Consent Form to participate
- Patients with moderate up severe dry eye with keratoconjunctivitis sicca diagnosed at least 4 weeks before the screening visit
- Patients using artificial tears at least once a day for at least 4 weeks before the screening visit
- Patients with corneal/conjunctival lesions consistent with a diagnosis of keratoconjunctivitis measured by tests of staining: i.e. the overall score of the corneal staining test must be ≥ 3 and ≤ 9 on the 15-point Oxford scale
- And at least one of the following element: Tear volume decreased: must be either present a Schirmer test ≥ 3 mm and ≤ 9 mm / 5 minutes or the sum of 3 consecutive measurements of the tear film break-up time (TBUT) ≤ 30s for at least one eye;
- OSDI score ≥18
- Covered by healthcare insurance.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with medical history of herpetic keratitis, peripheral ulcerative keratitis, sclerites, diabetic retinopathy
- Any systemic disease that is not well controlled for at least 2 months (e.g. lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, thyroiditis…) according to clinical judgment
- Patients using any topical therapies such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cortisone, cyclosporine, vasoconstrictor
- Patients with at least one of the following concomitant ocular inflammatory disease: Stevens Johnson Disease, Atopic Keratoconjunctivitis; Scarlet Eye Pemphigoid
- Patients with anomalies of the eyelid, sucking, infectious conjunctivitis, pterygia, and/or a glaucoma treated with eyedrops
- Presence of graft versus host disease (GVHD)
- Patients who have undergone surgery in the eye, within three months before the study enrolment
- Patients who have undergone corneal transplantation or refractive surgery or plan to undergo any eye surgery in the next four months
- Patients with known or suspected eye allergy
- Patients with a condition or history that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere significantly with the subject's participation in the study
- Female pregnant, planning a pregnancy during the study period and nursing an infant
- Patients who are participating or have participated in other clinical trial with investigational drug or device within 30 days prior to screening
- Patients unable to be compliant with the study procedures and requirements, according to the opinion of the investigator
- Patient deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, or who is under a measure of legal protection (e.g. guardianship or curatorship)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- SIFI SpAlead
Study Sites (11)
CHU d'Amiens
Amiens, France
Centre Rétine Anjou
Angers, 49000, France
Cabinet d'ophtalmologie Fosh
Bordeaux, France
Hopital Saint Vincent de Paul
Lille, France
Hopital Edouard Herriot
Lyon, France
Hôpital Saint Joseph
Marseille, France
Chu Kremlin-Bicetre
Paris, 94270, France
APHP - Hôpital Cochin
Paris, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes
Rennes, France
CHU Strasbourg
Strasbourg, France
Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet
Zaragoza, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marc Labetoulle, MD; Pr
CHU KREMLIN-BICETRE
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Single Blind: investigator masked
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2018
First Posted
January 15, 2019
Study Start
July 8, 2019
Primary Completion
June 30, 2020
Study Completion
June 30, 2020
Last Updated
May 9, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05