Effect of a Dyadic Multisensory and Cognitive Stimulation Program for People With Dementia and Their Caregivers
Effects of a Home Based, Dyadic Multisensory and Cognitive Stimulation (MCS) Program for the People With Dementia and Their Family Caregivers: a Pilot Quasi-experimental Study
1 other identifier
interventional
240
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Although multisensory and cognitive stimulation therapy was shown as an effective intervention in improving cognition and behavioral symptoms of people with dementia (PWD), it is not commonly found as an element in the previous dyadic interventions. It was believed that the involvement of the family caregivers in multisensory and cognitive stimulation therapy could produce additional benefits to both PWD and caregivers by enhancing their interactions. Therefore, we will conduct a pilot study which aims to explore the feasibility and the effects of a home based dyadic multisensory and cognitive stimulation (MCS) program for the PWD and their family caregivers followed by a randomized controlled trial (RCT). In the RCT, the intervention group will attend the home-based dyadic MCS group, while the control group will receive the usual care. The outcomes measurements of caregivers (positive caregiving experience, perceived stress, caregiver burden, and quality of life) and PWD (cognitive function and behavioral symptoms) will be assessed at baseline, immediately post intervention, and 3 month-follow up. To understand the therapeutic components and identify the strengths, limitations and difficulties of the home based dyadic MCS program, process evaluation will be conducted through semi-structured focus group interviews with 15 participants from the MCS group. It is hypothesized that the MCS group will have a significant improvement on positive caregiving experience, perceived stress, caregiver burden, and quality of life of caregivers and cognitive function and behavioral symptoms of PWD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 19, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 14, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2022
CompletedJune 4, 2024
June 1, 2024
2.1 years
October 19, 2018
June 3, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Change in positive caregiving experience before and after the intervention
The Change in caregivers' positive caregiving experience will be measured with the Chinese version of Positive Aspect of Caregiving scale (PAC). The PAC contains 11 items with 5-point Likert scale for all items responses. Scores for each items will be summed to compute a total score which ranges from 11 to 55, with higher scores indicating a more positive self-perceptions of caregiving.
T0 (baseline) and (T1) immediately post-intervention
Change in stress before and after the intervention
The change in caregivers' stress will be measured with the Chinese version of Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). The PSS contains 10 items with 5-point Likert-type scale rating from 0 (never) to 4 (very often). Scores for each items will be summed up to create a total score. The total score is ranged from 0-40, with higher score representing a higher level of perceived stress.
T0 (baseline) and (T1) immediately post-intervention
Change in caregivers' burden before and after the intervention
The change of caregiver's burden (only on caregivers) will be measured with the Chinese version of Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). The scale comprises of 22 items including factors most frequently mentioned by caregivers as problem areas (e.g. caregivers' health, psychological well-being, finances, and social life). Caregivers will be asked to indicate the level of distress caused by each item, ranging from "not at all" to "extremely distressing," on a scale of 0 to 4. A total burden score will be obtained by adding up the scores for each response, with a possible total score ranging from 0 to 88. A higher score indicates greater caregiver distress.
T0 (baseline) and (T1) immediately post-intervention
Change in quality of life before and after the intervention
The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-OLD) short form will be used to assess the changes of caregivers' quality of life (QOL). The WHOQOL-OLD short form comprises of 6 old aged-specific quality of life items and each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale that ranged from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied). Scores for each responses will be summed up to create a total score ranged from 6 to 30. A higher score indicates a better quality of life.
T0 (baseline) and (T1) immediately post-intervention
Change in depressive symptoms before and after the intervention
Depressive mood changes of caregivers will be measured with the Chinese version of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale (CESD), which is a self-reported measurement on depression containing 20 items. Ratings were based on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (rarely or none of the time) to 3 (most or all of the time). Items for each responses will be summed up to create a total score ranging from 0 to 60. A higher CESD score indicates a higher level of depression.
T0 (baseline) and (T1) immediately post-intervention
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in cognitive functions of the PWD before and after the interventions
T0 (baseline) and (T1) immediately post-intervention
Change in behavioral and psychological symptoms of the PWD before and after the intervention
T0 (baseline) and (T1) immediately post-intervention
Study Arms (2)
Dyadic MCS program
EXPERIMENTALParticipants from the experimental group will receive a dyadic multisensory and cognitive stimulation (MCS) programme. The MCS program is a 15- week program. In the first 4 weeks, participants will attend the center-based Face-to-face (FTF) session twice a week (8 sessions), while in the remaining week (5th-15th Week), home-based sessions will be delivered by the caregivers with the PWD at home and was suggested to deliver the intervention 3 times/week at home. The home-based sessions will be supplemented with weekly telephone follow-up and two FTF sharing sessions over the intervention period.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants from the control group will receive usual care and no intervention will be received.
Interventions
In the first 4 weeks, the dyads will attend the center-based FTF sessions. Each session will last for 1.5 hours. In the first 60 minutes, MCS activities (e.g. reality orientation, calculation and drawing) will be led by an occupational therapist. Skills in delivering the MCS activities will also be taught to equip CG with skills in leading the home-based sessions later. CG will leave in the last 30 minutes to attend a psychoeducation group on caregiving (led by social workers) and the PWD will continue the session. From week 5 onwards, The home based session (Week 5-15) will be delivered by the CG 3 times weekly at home (30 - 45min/ session).The sessions will be supplemented with weekly telephone follow-up and two FTF sharing sessions held on the 8th and 12th week over the period.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 65 or above who had been diagnosed with any type of dementia,
- Community-dwelling (i.e., non-institutionalized)
- Understand Cantonese and able to follow simple instructions
- Family Caregivers
- Aged 18 years or above;
- The blood or by-marriage relatives (e.g. spouses, siblings, children, and grandchildren) of a person who has been clinically diagnosed with dementia, regardless of its types and these relatives are taking up the caring responsibilities ranging from physical aids to emotional supports, in the form of transportation, financial assistance, personal hygiene, and decision-making.;
- Providing most of the daily care and support for PWD (daily contact for at least four hours); and
- Able to speak Cantonese
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosed with a mental disorder such as bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or depression; and/or,
- Currently taking anticonvulsants, or any kind of psychotropic drugs, and/or identified with a self-reported suicidal thought or drug abuse in the past 6 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Patrick Kor
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (16)
Chin WY, Choi EP, Chan KT, Wong CK. The Psychometric Properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in Chinese Primary Care Patients: Factor Structure, Construct Validity, Reliability, Sensitivity and Responsiveness. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 7;10(8):e0135131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135131. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26252739BACKGROUNDCohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.
PMID: 6668417BACKGROUNDThe Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence - Seventh edition Grove Susan K The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence - Seventh edition 752pp Elsevier 9781455707362 1455707368 [Formula: see text]. Nurs Stand. 2013 Apr 3;27(31):30. doi: 10.7748/ns2013.04.27.31.30.b1488.
PMID: 26981669BACKGROUNDHamer RM, Simpson PM. Last observation carried forward versus mixed models in the analysis of psychiatric clinical trials. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;166(6):639-41. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09040458. No abstract available.
PMID: 19487398BACKGROUNDLeung DY, Lam TH, Chan SS. Three versions of Perceived Stress Scale: validation in a sample of Chinese cardiac patients who smoke. BMC Public Health. 2010 Aug 25;10:513. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-513.
PMID: 20735860BACKGROUNDPrince M, Bryce R, Albanese E, Wimo A, Ribeiro W, Ferri CP. The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimers Dement. 2013 Jan;9(1):63-75.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.007.
PMID: 23305823BACKGROUNDRadloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied psychological measurement, 1(3), 385-401. doi:10.1177/014662167700100306
BACKGROUNDSmits CH, de Lange J, Droes RM, Meiland F, Vernooij-Dassen M, Pot AM. Effects of combined intervention programmes for people with dementia living at home and their caregivers: a systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;22(12):1181-93. doi: 10.1002/gps.1805.
PMID: 17457793BACKGROUNDVan't Leven N, Prick AE, Groenewoud JG, Roelofs PD, de Lange J, Pot AM. Dyadic interventions for community-dwelling people with dementia and their family caregivers: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Oct;25(10):1581-603. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213000860. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
PMID: 23883489BACKGROUNDWong A, Cheng ST, Lo ES, Kwan PW, Law LS, Chan AY, Wong LK, Mok V. Validity and reliability of the neuropsychiatric inventory questionnaire version in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack having cognitive impairment. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2014 Dec;27(4):247-52. doi: 10.1177/0891988714532017. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
PMID: 24763069BACKGROUNDWong A, Xiong YY, Kwan PW, Chan AY, Lam WW, Wang K, Chu WC, Nyenhuis DL, Nasreddine Z, Wong LK, Mok VC. The validity, reliability and clinical utility of the Hong Kong Montreal Cognitive Assessment (HK-MoCA) in patients with cerebral small vessel disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2009;28(1):81-7. doi: 10.1159/000232589. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
PMID: 19672065BACKGROUNDYu R, Chau PH, McGhee SM, Cheung WL, Chan KC, Cheung SH, Woo J. Trends in prevalence and mortality of dementia in elderly Hong Kong population: projections, disease burden, and implications for long-term care. Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;2012:406852. doi: 10.1155/2012/406852. Epub 2012 Oct 14.
PMID: 23097740BACKGROUNDZarit SH, Reever KE, Bach-Peterson J. Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist. 1980 Dec;20(6):649-55. doi: 10.1093/geront/20.6.649. No abstract available.
PMID: 7203086BACKGROUNDChan, T. S., Lam, L. C., & Chiu, H. F. (2005). Validation of the Chinese version of the Zarit Burden Interview. Hong Kong Journal of Psychiatry, 15(1), 9-33.
BACKGROUNDChau, P. H., McGhee, S. M., Yu, R., Cheung, W. L., Chan, K. C., Cheung, S. H., & Woo, J. (2010). Dementia Trends: Impact of the Ageing Population and Societal Implications for Hong Kong. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Jockey Club.
BACKGROUNDKor PPK, Parial LL, Yu CTK, Liu JYW, Liu DPM, Hon JMK. Effects of a Family Caregiver-Delivered MultiSensory Cognitive Stimulation Intervention for Older People With Dementia During Coronavirus 2019: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Gerontologist. 2024 Feb 1;64(2):gnad054. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad054.
PMID: 37179458DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- All outcome measurements will be collected by assessors who are blinded to the group assignment of participants
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Instructor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 19, 2018
First Posted
January 14, 2019
Study Start
November 30, 2018
Primary Completion
December 30, 2020
Study Completion
January 30, 2022
Last Updated
June 4, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06