NCT03798444

Brief Summary

This is an observational and cross-sectional study on the height loss, kyphosis indicators, bone mineral density and vertebral fractures in Chinese postmenopausal women

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
255

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2017

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2017

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2017

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 20, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 10, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

January 10, 2019

Status Verified

January 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

29 days

First QC Date

November 20, 2018

Last Update Submit

January 7, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Height loss, KyphosisOsteoporosis, Vertebral fracturePostmenopausal women

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Height

    Subjects wearing light clothing and no shoes. Current height was measured using a wall-mounted stadiometer, with a horizontal plate pressed on the head, and hair flattened. Height were measured to the closest 0.5 cm,

    4 weeks

  • Weight

    Body weight was measured with subjects wearing light clothing and no shoes

    4 weeks

  • Rib to pelvis distance

    The rib to pelvis distance, which was the vertical distance between the lowest margin of the ribs and the superior surface of the iliac crest along the mid-axillary line, was measured twice by a physician who stood behind the subject. Measured in increments of 0.1 cm by two trained physicians.

    4 weeks

  • Wall-occiput distance

    Subjects were measured without shoes, with their heels, buttocks, and back to the wall, and head in a horizontal position with a double chin shown. The wall-occiput distance was defined as the horizontal distance between the wall and the back of the head. Measured in increments of 0.1 cm by two trained physicians.

    4 weeks

  • 7th cervical vertebra-wall distance

    Subjects were measured without shoes, with their heels, buttocks, and back to the wall, and head in a horizontal position with a double chin shown. The distance between the prominence of the 7th cervical vertebra and the wall was defined as 7th cervical vertebra-wall distance. Measured in increments of 0.1 cm by two trained physicians.

    4 weeks

  • Wall-tragus-distance

    Subjects were measured without shoes, with their heels, buttocks, and back to the wall, and head in a horizontal position with a double chin shown.Wall-tragus-distance was defined as the horizontal distance from the participant's tragus to the wall. Measured in increments of 0.1 cm by two trained physicians.

    4 weeks

  • Historical height loss

    The current measured height subtracted from the tallest recalled height was subjects' historical height loss

    4 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Bone mineral denstiy

BMD of the lumbar spine, left femoral neck, and total hip were measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in all subjects.Accroding to The World Health Organization, we defined osteoporosis as a T-score ≤-2.5,and the non osteoporosis as T-score\>-2.5.

Radiation: dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

Vertebral fractures

VFs were assessed using lateral spine imaging from T4 to L4 on X-ray. A visual semi-quantitative method was used, with fractures defined as a vertebral height ratio \<0.80 for the anterior/posterior or middle/posterior height ratio within a vertebra, or the posterior/posterior height ratio when compared to an adjacent vertebra.

Radiation: lateral spine imaging from T4 to L4 on X-ray

Interventions

BMD of the lumbar spine, left femoral neck, and total hip were measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. The lumbar spine, left femoral neck, or total hip of T-score ≤-2.5 as the osteoporosis

Bone mineral denstiy

VFs were assessed using lateral spine imaging from T4 to L4 on X-ray .A visual semi-quantitative method was used, with fractures defined as a vertebral Vertebral fractures should be diagnose if height ratio \<0.80 for the anterior/posterior or middle/posterior height ratio within a vertebra, or the posterior/posterior height ratio when compared to an adjacent vertebra

Vertebral fractures

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Postmenopausal women aged ≥50 years were randomly selected from community centers in Changsha City, Hunan Province, China in September 2017.

You may qualify if:

  • Postmenopausal women aged ≥50 years (Menopause was defined as the absence of menstrual cycles for at least one year)

You may not qualify if:

  • Morphological abnormalities or skeletal distortions

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The 2nd Xiangya Hospital, Central South University

Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Yoh K, Kuwabara A, Tanaka K. Detective value of historical height loss and current height/knee height ratio for prevalent vertebral fracture in Japanese postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Metab. 2014 Sep;32(5):533-8. doi: 10.1007/s00774-013-0525-y.

    PMID: 24122280BACKGROUND
  • Siminoski K, Warshawski RS, Jen H, Lee K. The accuracy of historical height loss for the detection of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2006 Feb;17(2):290-6. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-2017-y. Epub 2005 Sep 6.

    PMID: 16143833BACKGROUND
  • Siminoski K, Warshawski RS, Jen H, Lee KC. Accuracy of physical examination using the rib-pelvis distance for detection of lumbar vertebral fractures. Am J Med. 2003 Aug 15;115(3):233-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00299-7. No abstract available.

    PMID: 12935830BACKGROUND
  • Mizukami S, Abe Y, Tsujimoto R, Arima K, Kanagae M, Chiba G, Aoyagi K. Accuracy of spinal curvature assessed by a computer-assisted device and anthropometric indicators in discriminating vertebral fractures among individuals with back pain. Osteoporos Int. 2014 Jun;25(6):1727-34. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2680-y. Epub 2014 Mar 14.

    PMID: 24627138BACKGROUND
  • Suwannarat P, Amatachaya P, Sooknuan T, Tochaeng P, Kramkrathok K, Thaweewannakij T, Manimmanakorn N, Amatachaya S. Hyperkyphotic measures using distance from the wall: validity, reliability, and distance from the wall to indicate the risk for thoracic hyperkyphosis and vertebral fracture. Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Mar 12;13(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0433-9.

    PMID: 29532182BACKGROUND
  • Ralston SH, Urquhart GD, Brzeski M, Sturrock RD. Prevalence of vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis in ankylosing spondylitis. BMJ. 1990 Mar 3;300(6724):563-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6724.563.

    PMID: 2108749BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoporotic FracturesKyphosisOsteoporosisSpinal Fractures

Interventions

Absorptiometry, Photon

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Fractures, BoneWounds and InjuriesSpinal CurvaturesSpinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesBone Diseases, MetabolicMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesSpinal InjuriesBack Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RadiographyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisDensitometryPhotometryChemistry Techniques, AnalyticalInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • sheng zhifeng, MD

    Central south of university

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2018

First Posted

January 10, 2019

Study Start

September 1, 2017

Primary Completion

September 30, 2017

Study Completion

September 30, 2017

Last Updated

January 10, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-01

Locations