Corneal WFG Versus AF Trans PRK in Myopic Patients With High Corneal HOA
Corneal Wavefront Guided Versus Aberration Free Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy in Myopic Patients With High Pre-existing Corneal Higher Order Aberrations
1 other identifier
interventional
33
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
compare the efficacy, safety and predictability of corneal wavefront guided (WFG) and aberration free ablation in single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) in myopic patients with high pre-existing corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 12, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 2, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 26, 2018
CompletedDecember 26, 2018
December 1, 2018
12 months
September 2, 2018
December 20, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
corneal wavefront customized treatments and aberration free aspheric treatments
procedure was labeled successful if achieved the desired outcomes in terms of efficacy and safety. Efficacy index was defined as the ratio between the postoperative UDVA to the preoperative CDVA while safety index was defined as the ratio between the postoperative CDVA and the preoperative CDVA. Efficacy index around 1 and safety index more than 1 were desired. Failure was considered when the above outcomes failed to be achieved along with persistence or development of any of the following complications at 6 month postoperative follow up; corneal haze, persistent epithelial defects, ectasia, sterile infiltrate, infectious keratitis, central toxic keratopathy and steroid induced complications
1year
Study Arms (2)
42 eyes in aberration free group
ACTIVE COMPARATORTransPRK was performed to eligible myopic patients with or without astigmatism with corneal HOAs ≥ 0.35 µ utilizing aberration free in aberration free group provided by ORKCAM software (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions, Kleinostheim, Germany)
24 eyes in corneal WFG group
ACTIVE COMPARATORTransPRK was performed to eligible myopic patients with or without astigmatism with corneal HOAs ≥ 0.35 µ utilizing corneal WFG patterns in corneal WFG group provided by ORKCAM software (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions, Kleinostheim, Germany)
Interventions
TransPRK using ESIRIS flying spot excimer laser system (SCHWIND AMARIS®500E, SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions, Kleinhostheim, Germany), with 500 Hz repetition rate for faster treatments and scanning spots and with smart pulse technology. Eye-tracking during laser ablation was achieved using a 1050 Hz infrared eye tracker centered on the pupil. Static cyclotorsion control (SCC) compensation was obtained for all patients in corneal WFG group.
TransPRK was performed to eligible myopic patients with or without astigmatism with corneal HOAs ≥ 0.35 µ utilizing aberration free patterns provided by ORKCAM software (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions, Kleinostheim, Germany)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Myopic patients with or without astigmatism
You may not qualify if:
- severe dry eye,
- blepharitis,
- corneal disease,
- contact lens warpage,
- cataract,
- uveitis
- posterior segment anomalies involving the macula or optic nerve
- systemic conditions; diabetes mellitus, connective tissue disease, pregnancy or nursing. Also, any patient who had previous ocular surgery including keratorefractive surgery was excluded
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 2, 2018
First Posted
December 26, 2018
Study Start
January 12, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2017
Study Completion
December 31, 2017
Last Updated
December 26, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share