Study Stopped
Failure rate was 100% in one arm of the study (the intervention)
Regenerative Ability of TAMP BG and BD in Pulpotomized Primary Teeth
Comparison of the Regenerative Ability of Tailored Amorphous Multiporous Bioglass and Biodentine in Pulpotomized Primary Teeth
1 other identifier
interventional
102
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to assess clinically, radiographically, and histologically the regenerative ability of Tailored Amorphous Mulioporous (TAMP-BG) bioglass in comparison to Biodentine™ (BD) in pulpotomized primary teeth.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Dec 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 6, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 15, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 18, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 26, 2018
CompletedOctober 14, 2020
October 1, 2020
1.7 years
December 18, 2018
October 11, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Absence of clinical signs of pulp degeneration.
Teeth were considered clinically successful when they showed no signs of pain, sensitivity to percussion, swelling, fistula or pathologic mobility
1 month postoperatively
Percentage of Teeth with no clinical signs of pulp degeneration.
Teeth were considered clinically successful when they showed no signs of pain, sensitivity to percussion, swelling, fistula or pathologic mobility
3 months postoperatively
Percentage of Teeth with no clinical signs of pulp degeneration.
Teeth were considered clinically successful when they showed no signs of pain, sensitivity to percussion, swelling, fistula or pathologic mobility
6 months postoperatively
Percentage of Teeth with no clinical signs of pulp degeneration.
Teeth were considered clinically successful when they showed no signs of pain, sensitivity to percussion, swelling, fistula or pathologic mobility
9 months postoperatively
Percentage of Teeth with no clinical signs of pulp degeneration.
Teeth were considered clinically successful when they showed no signs of pain, sensitivity to percussion, swelling, fistula or pathologic mobility
12 months postoperatively
Percentage of Teeth with no radiographic signs of pulp degeneration.
Digital postoperative periapical radiographs were obtained and assessed for signs of pulp degeneration. Teeth were considered radiographically successful when they showed no periapical or interradicular radiolucency, abnormal root resorption or periodontal ligament space widening
6 months postoperatively
Percentage of Teeth with no radiographic signs of pulp degeneration.
Digital postoperative periapical radiographs were obtained and assessed for signs of pulp degeneration. Teeth were considered radiographically successful when they showed no periapical or interradicular radiolucency, abnormal root resorption or periodontal ligament space widening
12 months postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Percentage of teeth with radiographic evidence of dentin bridge formation
6 months postoperatively
Percentage of teeth with radiographic evidence of dentin bridge formation
12 months postoperatively
Dentin bridge formation using light microscopy
6 weeks
Inflammatory response using light microscopy
6 weeks
The Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) analysis.
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
TAMP bioglass
EXPERIMENTALTailored amorphous multiporous bioglass (TAMP-BG) of 70% SiO2 / 30% CaO was prepared according to Wang et al. (2011, 2013) in the tissue engineering lab, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University as follows: Scaffolds were grounded to 180- to 300-μm particle size and sterilized at 180°C for 2 hours. The resulting powder was mixed with distilled water to obtain a putty like consistency that was carried to the pulp chamber and condensed lightly on the pulp stumps.
Biodentine ™
ACTIVE COMPARATORBiodentine ™ (BD) pre-dosed capsule were gently tapped on a hard surface to diffuse the powder. Five drops of the liquid from the single dose dispenser were poured into the capsule and mixed for 30 seconds at 4,200 rpm in an amalgamator according to manufacturer's instructions to obtain putty- like consistency. (Powder-liquid system). It was then be carried to the pulp chamber and condensed lightly on the pulp stumps. Final restoration was applied after 12 minutes, allowing Biodentine ™ to set.
Interventions
TAMP bioglass compared to Biodentine in the regeneration on pulpotomized primary teeth
TAMP bioglass compared to Biodentine in the regeneration on pulpotomized primary teeth
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children free of any systemic disease or special health care needs.
- Children not receiving any anti-inflammatory medication.
- Cooperative children (positive/ definitely positive) according to Frankl's behavior rating scale.
- Restorable teeth.
- Teeth with vital carious pulp exposure that will bleed upon entering the pulp chamber and not requiring more than 5 minutes to achieve hemostasis after coronal pulp amputation.
- Teeth indicated for extraction for orthodontic purposes with the previously mentioned criteria (required for a subgroup for assessment of histological and inflammatory response outcomes).
You may not qualify if:
- Teeth with clinical or radiographic signs of pulp degeneration.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Nourhan M.Alylead
- Alexandria Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
Alexandria, 21512, Egypt
Related Publications (6)
Wang S, Falk MM, Rashad A, Saad MM, Marques AC, Almeida RM, Marei MK, Jain H. Evaluation of 3D nano-macro porous bioactive glass scaffold for hard tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2011 May;22(5):1195-203. doi: 10.1007/s10856-011-4297-4. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
PMID: 21445655BACKGROUNDWang S, Kowal TJ, Marei MK, Falk MM, Jain H. Nanoporosity significantly enhances the biological performance of engineered glass tissue scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013 Jul;19(13-14):1632-40. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2012.0585. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
PMID: 23427819BACKGROUNDStanley HR, Clark AE, Pameijer CH, Louw NP. Pulp capping with a modified bioglass formula (#A68-modified). Am J Dent. 2001 Aug;14(4):227-32.
PMID: 11699742BACKGROUNDHorsted P, El Attar K, Langeland K. Capping of monkey pulps with Dycal and a Ca-eugenol cement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1981 Nov;52(5):531-53. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(81)90366-2.
PMID: 6946381BACKGROUNDShayegan A, Jurysta C, Atash R, Petein M, Abbeele AV. Biodentine used as a pulp-capping agent in primary pig teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2012 Nov-Dec;34(7):e202-8.
PMID: 23265156BACKGROUNDElhamouly Y, El Backly RM, Talaat DM, Omar SS, El Tantawi M, Dowidar KML. Tailored 70S30C Bioactive glass induces severe inflammation as pulpotomy agent in primary teeth: an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jun;25(6):3775-3787. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03707-5. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
PMID: 33409691DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yasmine I El-Hamouly, MSc
Alexandria University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Karin ML Dowidar, PhD
Alexandria University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Samia Soliman, PhD
Alexandria University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Dalia AM Talaat, PhD
Alexandria University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Rania M El Backly, PhD
Alexandria University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The operator will not be blinded to the treatment type. However, the participants, their care givers, the expert assessing the histologic and inflammatory changes and the statistician will be blinded to the treatment groups.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Instructor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2018
First Posted
December 26, 2018
Study Start
December 6, 2016
Primary Completion
August 15, 2018
Study Completion
October 20, 2018
Last Updated
October 14, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10