Impact of Increased Protein Density Diet to Muscle Mass and Strength Among Mid-aged and Older Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The subjects of this intervention program are mainly based on community-dwelling mid-aged and older adults. The investigator's program will provide meals containing different proportionated protein.As this project is a double blind test, only the investigators will know which subject corresponding to specific group of diets. Besides, the investigators use the valued-based healthcare standard set as well as the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression, Charlson's comorbidity index Montreal Cognitive Assesment ,and Mini Nutritional Assessment as outcome measures and to use the randomized controlled trial design to validate if increased protein density diet could improve the vitality and health of mid-aged and old adults .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 6, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 24, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 13, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2019
CompletedFebruary 27, 2020
February 1, 2020
6 months
December 6, 2018
February 25, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Changes from baseline muscle strength after 12 weeks
measured by hand grip
baseline,12 weeks
Changes form baseline QUALITY OF LIFE after 12 weeks
measured by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), ranged 0-100, higher values represent a better condition
baseline, 12 weeks
Change from baseline Nutrition intake after 12 weeks
measured by Mini-nutritional assessment questionnaire. ranged 0-30, higher values represent a better condition
baseline, 12 weeks.
Change from baseline depression after 12 weeks
measured by the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) ranged 0-60, higher values represent a worse condition
baseline,12 weeks
Change from baseline cognitive ability after 12 weeks
measured by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) , ranged 0-30, higher values represent a better condition
baseline, 12 weeks
Change from baseline endurance after 12 weeks
measured by 6-minute walk distance
baseline, 12 weeks
Change from baseline walking speed after 12 weeks
measured by six-meter walking speed
baseline, 12 weeks
Change from baseline timed up and go test after 12 weeks
measured by timed up and go test (TUG) and six-meter walking speed
baseline, 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Change from baseline numbers of Complete blood count after 12 weeks
baseline,12 weeks
Change from baseline concentration of Albumin after 12 weeks
baseline,12 weeks
Change from baseline concentration of Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) after 12 weeks
baseline,12 weeks
Change from baseline concentration of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) after 12 weeks
baseline,12 weeks
Change from baseline concentration of blood urea nitrogen after 12 weeks
baseline,12 weeks
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
25% protein group
EXPERIMENTALThis experimental arm will be given meals containing 25% protein under same estimated calorie menus and protein may come from either egg, meat, fish, soy, or milk product. The meals would be provided 2 times per day, 5 days per week. The program will last for 12 weeks.
15% protein group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis control arm will be given meals containing 15% protein under same estimated calorie menus and protein may come from either egg, meat, fish, soy, or milk product. The meals would be provided 2 times per day, 5 days per week. The program will last for 12 weeks.
Interventions
Compared to usual group of 15% protein in meals, intervention group will receive 25% protein contents under same estimated calorie menus. Protein may come from either egg, meat, fish, soy, or milk product.
Designed as comparator , compared to empirical arm of 25% protein in meals, intervention group will receive 15% protein contents under same estimated calorie menus. Protein may come from either egg, meat, fish, soy, or milk product.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- People who aged 40-75 years
- Patients with following characteristics:
- feeling loss in activity
- detecting decline in self's walking speed.
- feeling tired of doing everything.
- having fell in last year.
- People can accept undergoing MRI
- People willing to follow the program and cooperate with us for following tracking.
- People who are neither vegan nor vegetarian
- People agree and be able to sign the informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- People cannot intake provided meals (e.g.: vegans or vegetarians) or any other who is allergic to our diets.
- People with any disease affecting their limbs, including:
- having fracture on limbs in the past 6 months
- having severe arthritis in the past 6 months
- any other whom PI recognized as weak control of their nervous system( e.g.: Parkinson's disease and stroke).
- People with intermittent limp caused by peripheral artery diseases
- People with weak control of mental disorder
- People with weak control of Cardiopulmonary disease
- People with weak control of Malignant tumor
- People with weak control of kidney diseases (eGFR \<60ml/min/1.73)
- People with Visual impairment and Hearing disorder which cannot help to complete the program.
- People who are unable to undertake MRI
- People who have underwent hormone treatment and planned to undergo hormone treatment during program session.
- Any other condition that PI recognized as not suitable
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Yang Ming University
Taipei, 112, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Liang-Kung Chen, MD.PhD.
Aging and Health Research Center, National Yang Ming University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- The program is designed as a double blind test, randomized intervention. Which meant that neither the subjects nor the PI and co-PI would not know which kind of diet they're going to obtain. Only investigators and test provider would know the meals corresponding to respective groups of subjects.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 6, 2018
First Posted
December 24, 2018
Study Start
February 13, 2019
Primary Completion
July 31, 2019
Study Completion
December 31, 2019
Last Updated
February 27, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02