NCT03783702

Brief Summary

Given the ongoing national opioid epidemic, an increased interest has developed in optimizing opioid prescribing practices of physicians, including otolaryngologists. Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is one of the most commonly performed surgeries by otolaryngologists with over 250,000 ESS's performed annually in the U.S. Multiple studies have shown that, compared to the amount patients actually consume, otolaryngologists prescribe a high quantity of opioids to patients recovering from ESS). It has been shown that these excess opioid medications contribute to prolonged use or abuse by the patient, family members, or friends. The purpose of this study is to better understand the pain management requirements of patients who undergo ESS for recurrent acute rhinosinusitis (RARS) or chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). This prospective, randomized, multi-institutional controlled trial will aim to determine the degree to which pain following ESS can be adequately controlled by non-opioid medications. It will also determine whether post-ESS narcotic use can be avoided entirely, or at least significantly limited. Patients will be randomized into two groups, each of which will receive a stepwise analgesic regimen consisting of acetaminophen and oxycodone or acetaminophen and ibuprofen. Pain will be assessed daily using visual analog scales (VAS) and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The results of this study will help to develop a standardized approach to pain management in the post-ESS setting and help to elucidate the role of non-opioid pain medications. The ultimate goal would be to positively affect opioid prescribing patterns among surgeons who perform ESS in order to significantly reduce the quantity of opioids prescribed to patients while continuing to adequately manage patients' pain.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
118

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2019

Geographic Reach
2 countries

6 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 19, 2018

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 21, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 4, 2019

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2020

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2020

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

September 1, 2021

Status Verified

August 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

December 19, 2018

Results QC Date

July 16, 2021

Last Update Submit

August 7, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (9)

  • Pain Severity

    A 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) will be used to assess pain severity.The VAS is a continuous, patient-reported outcome measure determined using a horizontal 100-mm scale ranging from "no pain" with a score of 0 to "worst imaginable pain," corresponding to a score of 100.

    Average pain score will be collected for preoperative visit (the day before surgery)

  • Pain Severity

    A 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) will be used to assess pain severity.The VAS is a continuous, patient-reported outcome measure determined using a horizontal 100-mm scale ranging from "no pain" with a score of 0 to "worst imaginable pain," corresponding to a score of 100.

    Average pain score was collected for postoperative day 1

  • Pain Severity

    A 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) will be used to assess pain severity.The VAS is a continuous, patient-reported outcome measure determined using a horizontal 100-mm scale ranging from "no pain" with a score of 0 to "worst imaginable pain," corresponding to a score of 100.

    Average pain score will be collected for postoperative day 2

  • Pain Severity

    A 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) will be used to assess pain severity.The VAS is a continuous, patient-reported outcome measure determined using a horizontal 100-mm scale ranging from "no pain" with a score of 0 to "worst imaginable pain," corresponding to a score of 100.

    Average pain score will be collected for postoperative day 3

  • Pain Severity

    A 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) will be used to assess pain severity.The VAS is a continuous, patient-reported outcome measure determined using a horizontal 100-mm scale ranging from "no pain" with a score of 0 to "worst imaginable pain," corresponding to a score of 100.

    Average pain score will be collected for postoperative day 4

  • Pain Severity

    A 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) will be used to assess pain severity.The VAS is a continuous, patient-reported outcome measure determined using a horizontal 100-mm scale ranging from "no pain" with a score of 0 to "worst imaginable pain," corresponding to a score of 100.

    Average pain score will be collected for postoperative day 5

  • Pain Severity

    A 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) will be used to assess pain severity.The VAS is a continuous, patient-reported outcome measure determined using a horizontal 100-mm scale ranging from "no pain" with a score of 0 to "worst imaginable pain," corresponding to a score of 100.

    Average pain score will be collected for postoperative day 6

  • Pain Severity

    A 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) will be used to assess pain severity.The VAS is a continuous, patient-reported outcome measure determined using a horizontal 100-mm scale ranging from "no pain" with a score of 0 to "worst imaginable pain," corresponding to a score of 100.

    Average pain score will be collected for postoperative day 7

  • Medication Log

    Patients kept a daily medication log and reported the number of doses consumed per day (650mg acetaminophen, 600mg ibuprofen, 5mg oxycodone). The mean number of medication doses per day was calculated for each treatment group.

    Postoperative day 1 to 7

Secondary Outcomes (16)

  • Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Score

    BPI score will be collected at the preoperative visit

  • Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Score

    Average BPI score will be collected for postoperative day 1

  • Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Score

    Average BPI score will be collected for postoperative day 2

  • Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Score

    Average BPI score will be collected for postoperative day 3

  • Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Score

    Average BPI score will be collected for postoperative day 4

  • +11 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Experimental group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients in the experimental group will be asked to start with acetaminophen (650mg tablet by mouth every 6 hours) when they are in pain. If they still require additional analgesics, the second-line medication is ibuprofen (600mg tablet by mouth every 6 hours). Oxycodone (5mg tablet by mouth every 4 hours) will be the third-line medication to be used if acetaminophen and ibuprofen do not sufficiently control the pain.

Drug: OxyCODONE 5 Mg (milligram) Oral TabletDrug: Ibuprofen 600 Mg (milligram) Oral TabletDrug: Acetaminophen 650 MG (milligram) Oral Tablet

Control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in the control group will be asked to start with acetaminophen (650mg tablet by mouth every 6 hours) when they are in pain. If they still require additional analgesics, the second-line medication is oxycodone (5mg tablet by mouth every 4 hours).

Drug: OxyCODONE 5 Mg (milligram) Oral TabletDrug: Acetaminophen 650 MG (milligram) Oral Tablet

Interventions

Oxycodone will be the second-line treatment in the control group and the third-line treatment in the experimental group.

Control groupExperimental group

Patients in the experimental group will receive ibuprofen 600mg as the second-line analgesic.

Experimental group

All patients will receive acetaminophen as the first-line analgesic.

Control groupExperimental group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years or older
  • English-speaking
  • Scheduled to undergo endoscopic sinus surgery for sinusitis (CRSwNP, CRSsNP, or RARS)
  • Can commit to follow up for at least one postoperative visit

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing a septorhinoplasty (septoplasty permissible if patient will also undergo sinus surgery)
  • Doyle splints to be used
  • Alcohol or opioid use disorder
  • History of chronic pain disorders
  • Regular use of acetaminophen/NSAIDS (\>4x per week)
  • Patients who use narcotics or neuromodulating drugs (e.g. gabapentin, nortriptyline)more than 2x per week on average.
  • Gastrointestinal ulcers or bleeding
  • Chronic kidney disease/known decreased renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate \<60)
  • Liver cirrhosis or other hepatic impairment
  • Prior adverse reaction to opioids or NSAIDS
  • Other contraindications to any drug classes in either group.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (6)

Stanford Health Care

Stanford, California, 94305, United States

Location

NorthShore University Health System

Evanston, Illinois, 60201, United States

Location

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

Location

Albert Einstein

The Bronx, New York, 10461, United States

Location

Vanderbilt

Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States

Location

University of British Columbia

Vancouver, Canada

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Bhattacharyya N. Ambulatory sinus and nasal surgery in the United States: demographics and perioperative outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2010 Mar;120(3):635-8. doi: 10.1002/lary.20777.

    PMID: 20058315BACKGROUND
  • Schwartz MA, Naples JG, Kuo CL, Falcone TE. Opioid Prescribing Patterns among Otolaryngologists. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 May;158(5):854-859. doi: 10.1177/0194599818757959. Epub 2018 Feb 20.

    PMID: 29460670BACKGROUND
  • Svider PF, Arianpour K, Guo E, Folbe E, Zuliani G, Lin H, Eloy JA, Folbe AJ. Opioid prescribing patterns among otolaryngologists: Crucial insights among the medicare population. Laryngoscope. 2018 Jul;128(7):1576-1581. doi: 10.1002/lary.27101. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

    PMID: 29446449BACKGROUND
  • Mohan S, Bhattacharyya N. Opioids and the Otolaryngologist: An Ambulatory Assessment. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jul;159(1):29-34. doi: 10.1177/0194599818765125. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

    PMID: 29557264BACKGROUND
  • Ayoub NF, Choby G, Turner JH, Abuzeid WM, Raviv JR, Thamboo A, Ma Y, Chandra RK, Chowdhury NI, Stokken JK, O'Brien EK, Shah S, Akbar N, Roozdar P, Nayak JV, Patel ZM, Hwang PH. Assessment of Opioid Use and Analgesic Requirements After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Sep 1;147(9):811-819. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.1839.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

SinusitisOpioid-Related DisordersOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesPain, PostoperativePain

Interventions

OxycodoneMagnesiumTabletsIbuprofenAcetaminophen

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract InfectionsInfectionsParanasal Sinus DiseasesNose DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesNarcotic-Related DisordersSubstance-Related DisordersChemically-Induced DisordersMental DisordersPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CodeineMorphine DerivativesMorphinansOpiate AlkaloidsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingPhenanthrenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPolycyclic CompoundsMetals, Alkaline EarthElementsInorganic ChemicalsMetals, LightMetalsDosage FormsPharmaceutical PreparationsPhenylpropionatesAcids, CarbocyclicCarboxylic AcidsOrganic ChemicalsAcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesAniline CompoundsAmines

Limitations and Caveats

The low levels of narcotic consumption observed may have precluded achieving significance in pain score comparisons across groups, as the pre-hoc power analysis predicted higher levels of opioid use Selection bias: 1) patient willingness to participate in an opioid-related study could serve as a source of bias 2) loss to follow up Lack of blinding and placebo were additional limitations

Results Point of Contact

Title
Noel Ayoub
Organization
Stanford University School of Medicine

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients will be randomized into one of two groups: one will receive acetaminophen and oxycodone while the other will receive acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and oxycodone.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator, Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2018

First Posted

December 21, 2018

Study Start

April 4, 2019

Primary Completion

July 1, 2020

Study Completion

December 30, 2020

Last Updated

September 1, 2021

Results First Posted

September 1, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations