12 Versus 20 mL PCB for D&E Cervical Prep
12 Versus 20 mL Paracervical Block for Pain-Control During Cervical Preparation for Dilation and Evacuation: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
More research is needed to investigate methods of pain control for cervical preparation for abortion procedures. Women report pain with paracervical block injection as well as with osmotic dilator placement. This study seeks to compare a 12 mL, 2-site 1% plain lidocaine paracervical block for pain control during cervical preparation (osmotic dilator insertion) for Dilation and Evacuation (D\&E) to a 20 mL 1% lidocaine 2-site paracervical block.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 pain
Started Jan 2017
Longer than P75 for phase_4 pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 20, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 29, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 15, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 15, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 19, 2021
CompletedJanuary 23, 2024
January 1, 2024
3.8 years
November 20, 2017
August 16, 2021
January 19, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Immediately Following Dilator Insertion
The primary objective is to determine pain perceived immediately following dilator insertion measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (0-100mm; 0 being no pain, 100 being worst pain imaginable).
Time of dilator insertion (less than 1 minute to assess pain)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Anticipated Pain Immediately Prior to Dilator Insertion
Up to 1 minute to complete survey
Patient Global Satisfaction Score
Up to 1 minute to complete survey
Total Procedure Time
Up to 10 minutes
Physician-reported Ease of Insertion
Up to 1 minute to complete survey
Count of Participants With Procedural Complications
Up to 10 minutes
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
12 mL arm
EXPERIMENTALIntervention: * Syringe loaded with 12 mL of 1% lidocaine (120 mg); 22-gauge spinal needle * 2 mL injected at the tenaculum site, either 6 or 12 o'clock superficially into the cervix * The tenaculum is immediately placed at the previously injected site * The remaining 10 mL are slowly injected into the cervicovaginal junction in two equal aliquots at 4 and 8 o'clock; the injection is continuous from superficial to deep (3 cm) to superficial (injecting with insertion and withdrawal) * No wait time between injection and dilator insertion
20 mL arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntervention: * Syringe loaded with 20 mL of 1% lidocaine (120 mg); 22-gauge spinal needle * 2 mL injected at the tenaculum site, either 6 or 12 o'clock superficially into the cervix * The tenaculum is immediately placed at the previously injected site * The remaining 18 mL are slowly injected into the cervicovaginal junction in two equal aliquots at 4 and 8 o'clock; the injection is continuous from superficial to deep (3 cm) to superficial (injecting with insertion and withdrawal) * No wait time between injection and dilator insertion
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women 18 and older
- Intrauterine pregnancy ≥16 weeks gestation
- English speaking competency
- Willing and able to sign consent forms
- Agree to comply with study procedures
You may not qualify if:
- Women less than 18 years of age
- IV conscious sedation
- Known allergy to study medication (lidocaine)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
Related Publications (1)
Shaw KA, Lerma K, Hughes T, Hastings C, Fok WK, Blumenthal PD. A Comparison of Paracervical Block Volumes Before Osmotic Dilator Placement: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep 1;138(3):443-448. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004485.
PMID: 34352829DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Principal Investigator
- Organization
- Stanford University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- The provider and staff will be aware of arm allocation, but participants will remain blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 20, 2017
First Posted
November 29, 2017
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
October 15, 2020
Study Completion
October 15, 2020
Last Updated
January 23, 2024
Results First Posted
October 19, 2021
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No individual participant data will be shared with other researchers.