NCT03356145

Brief Summary

More research is needed to investigate methods of pain control for cervical preparation for abortion procedures. Women report pain with paracervical block injection as well as with osmotic dilator placement. This study seeks to compare a 12 mL, 2-site 1% plain lidocaine paracervical block for pain control during cervical preparation (osmotic dilator insertion) for Dilation and Evacuation (D\&E) to a 20 mL 1% lidocaine 2-site paracervical block.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
96

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2017

Longer than P75 for phase_4 pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2017

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 20, 2017

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 29, 2017

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 15, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 15, 2020

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 19, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

January 23, 2024

Status Verified

January 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

November 20, 2017

Results QC Date

August 16, 2021

Last Update Submit

January 19, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

paracervical blockabortiondilation and evacuationcervical preparation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain Immediately Following Dilator Insertion

    The primary objective is to determine pain perceived immediately following dilator insertion measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (0-100mm; 0 being no pain, 100 being worst pain imaginable).

    Time of dilator insertion (less than 1 minute to assess pain)

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Anticipated Pain Immediately Prior to Dilator Insertion

    Up to 1 minute to complete survey

  • Patient Global Satisfaction Score

    Up to 1 minute to complete survey

  • Total Procedure Time

    Up to 10 minutes

  • Physician-reported Ease of Insertion

    Up to 1 minute to complete survey

  • Count of Participants With Procedural Complications

    Up to 10 minutes

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

12 mL arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Intervention: * Syringe loaded with 12 mL of 1% lidocaine (120 mg); 22-gauge spinal needle * 2 mL injected at the tenaculum site, either 6 or 12 o'clock superficially into the cervix * The tenaculum is immediately placed at the previously injected site * The remaining 10 mL are slowly injected into the cervicovaginal junction in two equal aliquots at 4 and 8 o'clock; the injection is continuous from superficial to deep (3 cm) to superficial (injecting with insertion and withdrawal) * No wait time between injection and dilator insertion

Drug: 12 mL paracervical block

20 mL arm

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Intervention: * Syringe loaded with 20 mL of 1% lidocaine (120 mg); 22-gauge spinal needle * 2 mL injected at the tenaculum site, either 6 or 12 o'clock superficially into the cervix * The tenaculum is immediately placed at the previously injected site * The remaining 18 mL are slowly injected into the cervicovaginal junction in two equal aliquots at 4 and 8 o'clock; the injection is continuous from superficial to deep (3 cm) to superficial (injecting with insertion and withdrawal) * No wait time between injection and dilator insertion

Drug: 20 mL paracervical block

Interventions

Injection of 12 mL of lidocaine

12 mL arm

Injection of 20 mL of lidocaine

20 mL arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Women 18 and older
  • Intrauterine pregnancy ≥16 weeks gestation
  • English speaking competency
  • Willing and able to sign consent forms
  • Agree to comply with study procedures

You may not qualify if:

  • Women less than 18 years of age
  • IV conscious sedation
  • Known allergy to study medication (lidocaine)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Stanford University

Stanford, California, 94305, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Shaw KA, Lerma K, Hughes T, Hastings C, Fok WK, Blumenthal PD. A Comparison of Paracervical Block Volumes Before Osmotic Dilator Placement: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep 1;138(3):443-448. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004485.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainDilatation, Pathologic

Interventions

Anesthesia, Obstetrical

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Anatomical

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnesthesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia

Results Point of Contact

Title
Principal Investigator
Organization
Stanford University

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
The provider and staff will be aware of arm allocation, but participants will remain blinded.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will be randomized to one of two study arms via computer-generated block randomization using REDCap software.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2017

First Posted

November 29, 2017

Study Start

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion

October 15, 2020

Study Completion

October 15, 2020

Last Updated

January 23, 2024

Results First Posted

October 19, 2021

Record last verified: 2024-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

No individual participant data will be shared with other researchers.

Locations