Study Stopped
change in practice pattern
Wound Closure Study in Carpal Tunnel and Trigger Finger Surgery
Absorbable Versus Non-Absorbable Suture in Carpal Tunnel and Trigger Finger Wound Closure
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Does a difference in patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome exist between wound closure with absorbable or non-absorbable sutures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Dec 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 19, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2026
CompletedMarch 5, 2026
March 1, 2026
6.3 years
November 14, 2018
March 3, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Scar formation with the Patient and Observer Scare Assessment Scale
Blinded scar assessment utilizing the patient and observer scar assessment scale version 2.0 (POSAS). The POSAS is scored from the perspective of the patient and a blinded observer independently. Scores range from 1 to 10 with 1 indicating normal skin and 10 indicating the worst scar imaginable. The 1 to 10 scoring is performed in 6 domains of various scar characteristics to obtain a total score ranging from 10 to 60. Additionally, there is an overall scar appearance score that ranges from 1 to 10 with 1 indicating normal skin and 10 indicating the worst scar imaginable.
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Absorbable suture
EXPERIMENTALWound closure with absorbable suture.
Non-absorbable suture
ACTIVE COMPARATORWound closure with non-absorbable suture.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Any patient greater than or equal to 18 years of age.
- Any patient undergoing primary open carpal tunnel release or primary trigger finger pulley release
You may not qualify if:
- Any patient identified outside of the proposed study time period.
- Any patient receiving revision surgery
- Patients who have had prior ipsilateral palmar or finger surgery
- Patients with Dupuytren's disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter C Rhee
Mayo Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Blinded assessment for wound healing
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2018
First Posted
December 19, 2018
Study Start
December 1, 2019
Primary Completion
March 1, 2026
Study Completion
March 1, 2026
Last Updated
March 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share