NCT03950401

Brief Summary

The investigators will compare the early postoperative outcome of wound closure technique in carpal tunnel release using Nylon sutures versus subcuticular Monocryl sutures. The investigators plan to randomize patients across three hand surgeons who will perform both techniques, and will survey the patients satisfaction of pain and appearance at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
124

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 13, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 15, 2019

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 16, 2019

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 27, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 27, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

December 21, 2021

Status Verified

December 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

May 13, 2019

Last Update Submit

December 20, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

skin closure

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) Score - Patient

    As measured by a questionnaire completed by the patient. The patient scale consists of 6 items scored on a scale ranging from 1 ('no, not at all' or 'no, normal skin') to 10 ('yes, very much' or 'yes, very different'). Furthermore, an overall opinion is scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 10.

    6 weeks

  • Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) Score - Observer

    As measured by a questionnaire completed by the clinic physician assistant. The observer scale of the POSAS consists of six items (vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability and surface area). All items are scored on a scale ranging from 1 ('like normal skin') to 10 ('worst scar imaginable'). The sum of the six items results in a total score of the POSAS observer scale. Furthermore, an overall opinion is scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 10.

    6 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient satisfaction

    6 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Monocryl

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Closure of the skin at the completion of surgery by interrupted subcuticular technique with absorbable Monocryl suture.

Procedure: Monocryl

Nylon

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Closure of the skin at the completion of surgery by interrupted technique on top of the skin with non-absorbable Nylon suture. These will be removed at the first postoperative visit.

Procedure: Nylon

Interventions

MonocrylPROCEDURE

subcuticular Monocryl wound closure

Monocryl
NylonPROCEDURE

wound closure using nylon suture on the skin

Nylon

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients at the University of California, Davis Health Center who are scheduled to undergo surgery for carpal tunnel release will be screened for eligibility for this study.
  • Patients who do not speak English will be included in this study, and will be provided with appropriate translators at all communication points.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who are not able to follow up at the 2 and 6 week postoperative time points.
  • Patients who have known skin sensitivity to tape or absorbable suture.
  • Those who are unable to give informed consent, individuals who are not yet adults (18 years or older), pregnant women, and prisoners will be excluded from this study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of California, Davis

Sacramento, California, 95817, United States

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Wade RG, Wormald JC, Figus A. Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after carpal tunnel decompression surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD011757. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011757.pub2.

    PMID: 29390170BACKGROUND
  • Menovsky T, Bartels RH, van Lindert EL, Grotenhuis JA. Skin closure in carpal tunnel surgery: a prospective comparative study between nylon, polyglactin 910 and stainless steel sutures. Hand Surg. 2004 Jul;9(1):35-8. doi: 10.1142/s0218810404002017.

    PMID: 15368623BACKGROUND
  • Hansen TB, Kirkeby L, Fisker H, Larsen K. Randomised controlled study of two different techniques of skin suture in endoscopic release of carpal tunnel. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2009;43(6):335-8. doi: 10.1080/02844310902955763.

    PMID: 19995253BACKGROUND
  • Fleisher J, Khalifeh A, Pettker C, Berghella V, Dabbish N, Mackeen AD. Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Nov;32(22):3830-3835. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1474870. Epub 2018 May 24.

    PMID: 29739243BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Interventions

glycolide E-caprolactone copolymerNylons

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Median NeuropathyMononeuropathiesPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesNerve Compression SyndromesCumulative Trauma DisordersSprains and StrainsWounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PlasticsPolymersMacromolecular SubstancesBiomedical and Dental MaterialsManufactured MaterialsTechnology, Industry, and Agriculture

Study Officials

  • Robert M Szabo, MD, MPH

    University of California, Davis

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
There is no way to mask the two techniques from the provider or patient since they will see the final result of the technique. The data analysis can be performed in a blinded manner.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomization to Monocryl versus subcuticular Nylon type of skin closure.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2019

First Posted

May 15, 2019

Study Start

May 16, 2019

Primary Completion

September 27, 2021

Study Completion

September 27, 2021

Last Updated

December 21, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Correspondence of participants, their status in the study and the survey questions will be through encrypted excel document within encrypted OneDrive sharing folder with a link that is personally sent to the participants of the study.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
Time Frame
Upon first patient enrollment, until completion of data analysis, likely at 2 years.
Access Criteria
Completed HIPAA and human subjects research training as enforced by University of California, Davis, and included as a participant of the study.

Locations