Proposal To Develop A Rapid And Cost-Effective Diagnostic Test For Schizophrenia
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Schizophrenia is a severe psychotic illness of unknown cause that affects 1% of the population worldwide. Currently, there is no diagnostic test for schizophrenia. Instead, the diagnosis is typically established through a psychiatric interview of the patient, who is evaluated against a set of established criteria of signs and symptoms. It can take many months to years to establish a diagnosis of schizophrenia and achieve an appropriate treatment regimen to attain resolution of the patient's symptoms. This process is particularly challenging in areas of limited access to specialists a problem not only in third world countries and rural regions, but throughout the United States where there can be long waits to obtain an appointment with a psychiatrist. The present research experiment investigates a potential novel method for diagnosing schizophrenia. The overall objective of the study is to test the hypothesis that patients with schizophrenia will have a heightened tolerance to the sedating effects of anti-psychotic medications, which will be reflected in differences in their electroencephalogram (EEG) when compared to healthy normal controls. The investigators expect that the schizophrenia patients will score on the "more alert" and "less sleepy" ends of these scales, and that the normal control subjects will show the opposite response. A patient that fails to become sedated or experience the sleepiness side effects, typically caused by the anti-psychotic medication, may support the existing diagnosis of schizophrenia. Measures of the subjects' level of sedation that are found to correlate significantly with EEG response and diagnosis will be used to create a diagnostic test. This simple and inexpensive test will consist of a single dosage of anti-psychotic medication, and a rapid assessment tool with scores that have a high degree of predictive validity for the diagnosis of schizophrenia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1 schizophrenia
Started Nov 2017
Longer than P75 for phase_1 schizophrenia
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 13, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 20, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 19, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 10, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 10, 2026
CompletedJune 3, 2025
May 1, 2025
8.2 years
October 13, 2017
May 28, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Heart Rate
Evaluating the heart rate of the subject every hour during all the test procedures
up to 2 years
Pulse Rate
Evaluating the pulse rate of the subject every hour during all the test procedures
up to 2 years
Stanford Sleepiness Scale
The subject will rate how sleepy they are feeling at baseline and every hour during the test using an (8) point scale (i.e. 1= feeling active, vital alert, or wide awake; 2= functioning at high levels, but not fully alert; 3= awake, but relaxed, responsive but not fully alert; 4= somewhat foggy, let down; 5= foggy, losing interest in remaining awake, slowed down; 6= sleepy, woozy, fighting sleep, prefer to lay down; 7= no longer fighting sleep, sleep onset soon, having dream-like thoughts; 8= asleep
up to 2 years
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
The subject will rate their pre-test sleepiness only once during the test using a (4) point scale (0= no chance of dosing, 1= slight chance of dosing, 2= moderate chance of dozing and 3= high chance of dozing
up to 2 years
Fatigue Severity Scale
The subject will rate their pre-test fatigue only once during the test by rating 10 questions using a slide scale between 1 and 7. A rating of 1 means the subject strongly disagrees with the statement. A rating of 7 means the subject strongly agrees with the statement.
up to 2 years
Chalder Fatigue Scale
Subjects will rate their fatigue every hour and at baseline by answering 11 questions and rating their fatigue using a 4 point scale (i.e. less than usual, no more than usual, more than usual and much more than usual)
up to 2 years
Psychomotor physical computerized test
The participants uses a computerized test to test their reflexes every hour and at baseline during the trial period. Every time a red dot appears in the middle of the screen the participant must touch the computer screen as fast as they can. This test was measured in how fast they responded (ms) and by how many attempts to touch the screen were recorded in 2 minutes
up to 2 years
Hand Fatigue Scale
A hand grip measuring device will be used to test for fatigue. A small hand held device will measure the participants hand grip strength every hour during the test and at baseline.
up to 2 years
Electroencephalogram
Electroencephalogram will be taken at baseline and after subjects have taken the anti-psychotic medication. There will be no placebo taken for this test.
up to 2 years
Study Arms (3)
Ziprasidone
EXPERIMENTALThe investigators will conduct a pilot dose-response evaluation of a single dose of the anti-psychotic drug ziprasidone (Geodon). The investigators will start with a single 20mg pill given to (3) subjects and will increase the dosage in sequential subjects until the desired sedation effect is achieved (i.e. 40 and 60mg tablets). If Ziprasidone causes the desired sedation effect additional healthy subjects will be recruited to take the medication and have an electroencephalogram (EEG) taken.
Olanzapine
EXPERIMENTALThe investigators will conduct a pilot dose-response evaluation of a single dose of the anti-psychotic drug olanzapine (Zyprexa). The investigators will start with a single 2.5 mg pill given to (3) subjects and will increase the dosage in sequential subjects until the desired sedation effect is achieved (i.e. 5, 7.5, and 10 mg tablets).If olanzapine causes the desired sedation effect additional healthy subjects will be recruited to take the medication and have an electroencephalogram (EEG).
Placebo Comparator
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe investigators have prepared a placebo which duplicates the exact color and size of the study drug capsule to use as a non-drug control.
Interventions
anti-psychotic drug proposed for use as rapid diagnostic tool
anti-psychotic drug proposed for use as rapid diagnostic tool
A non drug oral placebo capsule will be given as a control
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be between 18 and 40 years of age
- Be able to understand English
- Have no history of psychosis
- Have no history of sleep apnea, heart condition or seizure
- Have no known drug allergies
- The ability to swallow a pill
You may not qualify if:
- Refuse to sign the consent form
- Drink caffeine or alcohol within 24 hours of the study
- Have the EKG readout report borderline or abnormal ECG
- Have the 12 panel urine drug screen show a positive result
- Be pregnant
- Be between 18 and 40 years of age
- Be able to understand English
- Have been diagnosed with a Schizophrenia Spectrum or other psychotic disorder
- Belong to one of three groups:
- Never medicated patients with a first episode of psychosis
- Have not received long acting injectable (depot) antipsychotic in previous 6 months
- Have not received oral antipsychotic (or antidepressant that has serotonergic action) in previous 2 weeks
- Have no history of sleep apnea, heart condition or seizure
- Have no known drug allergies
- Be able to swallow a pill
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Arizonalead
- Sidney R. Baer, Jr. Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Banner University Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006, United States
Related Publications (7)
Cutler NR. Pharmacokinetic studies of antipsychotics in healthy volunteers versus patients. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62 Suppl 5:10-3; discussion 23-4.
PMID: 11305842BACKGROUNDGallitano-Mendel A, Izumi Y, Tokuda K, Zorumski CF, Howell MP, Muglia LJ, Wozniak DF, Milbrandt J. The immediate early gene early growth response gene 3 mediates adaptation to stress and novelty. Neuroscience. 2007 Sep 7;148(3):633-43. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.05.050. Epub 2007 Aug 9.
PMID: 17692471BACKGROUNDGallitano-Mendel A, Wozniak DF, Pehek EA, Milbrandt J. Mice lacking the immediate early gene Egr3 respond to the anti-aggressive effects of clozapine yet are relatively resistant to its sedating effects. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008 May;33(6):1266-75. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301505. Epub 2007 Jul 18.
PMID: 17637609BACKGROUNDWilliams AA, Ingram WM, Levine S, Resnik J, Kamel CM, Lish JR, Elizalde DI, Janowski SA, Shoker J, Kozlenkov A, Gonzalez-Maeso J, Gallitano AL. Reduced levels of serotonin 2A receptors underlie resistance of Egr3-deficient mice to locomotor suppression by clozapine. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Sep;37(10):2285-98. doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.81. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
PMID: 22692564BACKGROUNDSelvaraj S, Arnone D, Cappai A, Howes O. Alterations in the serotonin system in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of postmortem and molecular imaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Sep;45:233-45. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
PMID: 24971825BACKGROUNDEverson G, Lasseter KC, Anderson KE, Bauer LA, Carithens RL Jr, Wilner KD, Johnson A, Anziano RJ, Smolarek TA, Turncliff RZ. The pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone in subjects with normal and impaired hepatic function. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;49 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):21S-26S. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00149.x.
PMID: 10771450BACKGROUNDAlbaugh VL, Singareddy R, Mauger D, Lynch CJ. A double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover study of the acute metabolic effects of olanzapine in healthy volunteers. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022662. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
PMID: 21857944BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amelia Gallitano, MD,PhD
University of Arizona College of Medicine
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Double Blind Masking: The participant and the investigator are both blinded.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 13, 2017
First Posted
December 19, 2018
Study Start
November 20, 2017
Primary Completion
February 10, 2026
Study Completion
February 10, 2026
Last Updated
June 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share