NCT00697489

Brief Summary

The incidence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in parous women is estimated over 50%. A variety of urinary, bowel and sexual symptoms may be associated with POP. Moreover, a proportion of women who underwent a surgical correction of POP may occur post-surgical urinary incontinence and, thus, if this last presents as genuine stress-type or mixed-type, a second surgical intervention may be required. At this proposal, with the aim to reduce the incidence of postoperative urinary incontinence, the addition of a preventive continence procedure to a POP repair intervention has been widely proposed, but the potential benefits needs to be balanced against potential disadvantages. Based on these considerations, the aim of this trial will be to compare two different surgical strategies for women with POP without urinary stress incontinence. Specifically, the efficacy to associate and to follow a preventive continence procedure to the correction of POP will be compared.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2008

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 12, 2008

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 16, 2008

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

April 8, 2013

Status Verified

April 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

June 12, 2008

Last Update Submit

April 5, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Pelvic organ prolapseUrinary incontinenceMesh

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • efficacy (cure rate)

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • intra-operative complication rate

    one day

  • postoperative complications rate

    12 months

  • sexual function

    12 months

  • quality of life

    12 months

  • Failure rate

    12 months

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

unique surgery

Procedure: correction of POP plus preventive continence procedure

2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Double surgery

Procedure: POP surgery followed by eventual incontinence procedure

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Pelvic organ prolapse stage 2-3
  • Absence of subjective urinary stress incontinence

You may not qualify if:

  • pregnancy
  • \<12 months postpartum
  • systemic disease known to affect bladder function
  • current chemotherapy or radiation therapy
  • urethral diverticulum, augmentation cytoplasty, or artificial sphincter
  • recent pelvic surgery
  • patient age under 18 and over 80
  • any previous pelvic surgery, diabetes mellitus and collagen disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

"Pugliese" Hospital

Catanzaro, Catanzaro, 88100, Italy

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ ProlapseUrinary Incontinence

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ProlapsePathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsUrination DisordersUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesLower Urinary Tract SymptomsUrological ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Stefano Palomba, MD

    Chair of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Fulvio Zullo, MD

    Chair of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro

    STUDY CHAIR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2008

First Posted

June 16, 2008

Study Start

June 1, 2008

Primary Completion

August 1, 2010

Last Updated

April 8, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-04

Locations