Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence During or Following Correction of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Correction Plus Preventive Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence vs. Correction of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Followed by Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The incidence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in parous women is estimated over 50%. A variety of urinary, bowel and sexual symptoms may be associated with POP. Moreover, a proportion of women who underwent a surgical correction of POP may occur post-surgical urinary incontinence and, thus, if this last presents as genuine stress-type or mixed-type, a second surgical intervention may be required. At this proposal, with the aim to reduce the incidence of postoperative urinary incontinence, the addition of a preventive continence procedure to a POP repair intervention has been widely proposed, but the potential benefits needs to be balanced against potential disadvantages. Based on these considerations, the aim of this trial will be to compare two different surgical strategies for women with POP without urinary stress incontinence. Specifically, the efficacy to associate and to follow a preventive continence procedure to the correction of POP will be compared.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 12, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 16, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2010
CompletedApril 8, 2013
April 1, 2013
2.2 years
June 12, 2008
April 5, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
efficacy (cure rate)
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
intra-operative complication rate
one day
postoperative complications rate
12 months
sexual function
12 months
quality of life
12 months
Failure rate
12 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORunique surgery
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORDouble surgery
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pelvic organ prolapse stage 2-3
- Absence of subjective urinary stress incontinence
You may not qualify if:
- pregnancy
- \<12 months postpartum
- systemic disease known to affect bladder function
- current chemotherapy or radiation therapy
- urethral diverticulum, augmentation cytoplasty, or artificial sphincter
- recent pelvic surgery
- patient age under 18 and over 80
- any previous pelvic surgery, diabetes mellitus and collagen disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
"Pugliese" Hospital
Catanzaro, Catanzaro, 88100, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stefano Palomba, MD
Chair of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro
- STUDY CHAIR
Fulvio Zullo, MD
Chair of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 12, 2008
First Posted
June 16, 2008
Study Start
June 1, 2008
Primary Completion
August 1, 2010
Last Updated
April 8, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-04