Intensive Stuttering Group Therapy for School-age Children and the Effect of Emotional Reactivity on Therapy Outcomes
Integration of Individualized Variables of School-age Children Who Stutter Into Intensive Stuttering Group Therapy and the Effect of Emotional Reactivity on Therapy Outcomes
1 other identifier
interventional
11
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The primary objectives of this investigation were two-fold: 1) to investigate whether implementation of individualized desensitization exercises in an intensive stuttering group therapy for school-age children who stutter is superior to the standard application of intensive stuttering group therapy, 2) to examine the relationship between exhibited emotional reactivity (positive and negative affect) and stuttering recovery rates. Secondary objectives included: 1) investigating whether cognitive, affective, linguistic and social scores differ with treatment and, 2) heart rate and skin conductance changes associated with the stuttered utterance during intensive stuttering group therapy activities. Twelve children (8 to 12 years of age, with equal randomization \[1:1\]) randomized to two groups; 1) Study group, individualized desensitization exercises implemented in 2 weeks of intensive stuttering group therapy(n=6), 2) Control group, 2 weeks of standard intensive stuttering group therapy(n=6). Children were blinded to treatment arm. The first part of this study was a superiority trial of individualized desensitization exercises in intensive stuttering group therapy. The second part of the study was conducted with the study group during the daily therapy activities of intensive stuttering group therapy to investigate the emotion's effect on therapy outcomes with behavioral and physiological measures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 25, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 2, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 9, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 19, 2018
CompletedDecember 19, 2018
December 1, 2018
1.5 years
December 9, 2018
December 16, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The stuttering severity
Comparison of control group and study group by Turkish version of Stuttering Severity Instrument-4 score change.Stuttering Severity Instrument-4 is an instrument that measures stuttering severity of children in the age range of 6 to16 years. This instrument measures stuttering severity by 3 sub-items; 1)frequency, 2)duration, and 3)physical concominants. evaluates speech naturalness of the children's speech. Lowest available score on this instrument is 6 and is equivalent to very mild stuttering and 36\& higher points are equivalent to very severe stuttering.
One month before therapy to three months after therapy
Emotional reactivity (positive and negative affect) effect on therapy outcome
Obtained by means coding behavioral analysis of positive and negative affect. Emotion facial action coding was used to code positive and negative affects. Positive affect coded when the following action units(AU) appeared; AU 12 (extraction of the lip corner) and AU 6 +12 (cheek up with the extraction of the lip corner). Positive affect may be accompanied by AU1 + 2 (eyebrow elevation), AU25 (mouth opening) or AU 26 (loosening of jaw). If AU12 occurs without AU6, AU12 should occur at least C severity in the intensity classification from 5 to likert type A to E If AU12 is present with AU6, the intensity of AU12 is B. For the acceptance of affect as negative; AU 9 (nose creasing); AU 10 (upper lip elevation); AU 14 (pitting); AU 15 (depression of the lip corner); it is necessary that at least one of the codes AU 20 (lips stretching) and AU 1 + 4 (lifting the eyebrows to the midline and approaching) occur at intensity B.
Collected during first 3 days of the intensive stuttering group therapy to compare the therapy outcomes
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Changes in cognitive, affective, linguistic and social scores
One month before therapy to three months after therapy
Heart rate changes
Collected during first 3 days of the intensive stuttering group therapy
Skin conductance changes
Collected during first 3 days of the intensive stuttering group therapy
Study Arms (2)
Study Group
EXPERIMENTALIntensive stuttering group therapy which was included individualized desensitization exercises was applied with the study group. Family training was applied with the parents a month before the therapy. Ten days (4.5 hours a day, a total of 45 hours therapy) of intensive stuttering group therapy was applied.
Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard intensive stuttering group therapy was applied with the control group. Family training was applied with the parents a month before the therapy. Ten days (4.5 hours a day, a total of 45 hours therapy) of intensive stuttering group therapy was applied.
Interventions
implementing individualized desensitization exercises in standard application of intensive stuttering group therapy for school-age children who stutter
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- very mild to moderate stuttering based on Stuttering Severity Instrument-4-Turkish Version
- no history of intellectual, emotional, academic, hearing, neurological, physiological problems based on parental report
- no history of speech and/or language problems other than stuttering
- not to be received stuttering therapy during the previous six months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mavis Emel Kulak Kayikci, Assoc. Prof.
Hacettepe University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Assistant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 9, 2018
First Posted
December 19, 2018
Study Start
October 25, 2016
Primary Completion
May 2, 2018
Study Completion
June 20, 2018
Last Updated
December 19, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
On request