Three-dimensional Ultrasonography Versus Hysteroscopy in Evaluation of Uterine Cavity in Infertile Women
A Prospective Study Comparing Three-dimensional Ultrasonography Versus Hysteroscopy in Evaluation of Uterine Cavity in Infertile Women
1 other identifier
observational
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hysteroscopy has now become a gold-standard technique carried out for uterine cavity assessment in infertile women. Apart from direct visualizing of the endometrium by the naked eye, pathologies missed by other modalities of investigation can be picked up and managed appropriately. Unfortunately, the procedure itself is not free from complications e.g. perforation, cervical laceration, bleeding, limited access in cases of cervical stenosis and considered as an invasive procedure. Two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography (2D-TVS)and Three-dimensional TVS (3D-TVS) are non-invasive methods for evaluating the uterine cavity. The3D-TVS is superior to 2D-TVS in identifying uterine cavity abnormalities due to its ability to obtain a view of three different planes of the uterus, which could be used to locate the position of intracavitary pathology. Reports vary regarding the diagnostic accuracy of 3D-TVS that was reported to have 41.3-81.5% sensitivity and 94.6-98.7% specificity. So it became clear that 3D-TVS is a non-invasive and safe diagnostic tool for evaluation of the uterine cavity abnormalities but its sensitivity, specificity and accuracy still a matter of debate and warrants more evaluation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 14, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 17, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2021
CompletedJuly 16, 2019
July 1, 2019
2 years
December 14, 2018
July 13, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic accuracy of 3D-TVS
The diagnostic accuracy of 3D-TVS in comparison with hysteroscopy for evaluation of uterine cavity abnormalities in infertile women.
At 1 week postmenstrual
Study Arms (1)
Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography (3D-TVS)
The 3D-TVS will be done by an experienced gynecological sonographer. The uterine cavity will be assessed by obtaining a mid-coronal view. Then, hysteroscopy will be performed.
Interventions
The 3D-TVS will be done by an experienced gynecological sonographer. The uterine cavity will be assessed by obtaining a mid-coronal view. Then hysteroscopy will be performed
Eligibility Criteria
Infertile women (primary or secondary) aged between 18 and 40 years.
You may qualify if:
- Infertile women (primary or secondary)
- Age between 18 and 40 years.
You may not qualify if:
- age\<18 years and˃ 40 years.
- pelvic inflammatory disease.
- Active uterine bleeding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hatem AbuHashimlead
Study Sites (1)
Mansoura University Hospitals
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt
Related Publications (1)
Ahmadi F, Rashidy Z, Haghighi H, Akhoond M, Niknejadi M, Hemat M, Shamsipour M. Uterine cavity assessment in infertile women: Sensitivity and specificity of three-dimensional Hysterosonography versus Hysteroscopy. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013 Dec;11(12):977-82.
PMID: 24639723BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Hatem Abu Hashim, MD. FRCOG. PhD
Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamed Fekry, MSc
Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 14, 2018
First Posted
December 17, 2018
Study Start
January 1, 2019
Primary Completion
January 1, 2021
Study Completion
January 1, 2021
Last Updated
July 16, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07