Effect of GH Administration in Poor Responders Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI)
Effect of Growth Hormone Administration With Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Expected Poor Responders POSEIDON Group 3 and 4 Undergoing ICSI Using Antagonist Protocol
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Despite the use of various treatment strategies, poor response to ovarian stimulation remains a major clinical challenge with lower chance to obtain sufficient number of oocytes and thus less likely to conceive with high risk of cycle cancellation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of recombinant human GH administration to gonadotropins on clinical and laboratory ICSI outcomes in expected poor responders more and less than 35 years (Poseidon group 4 and 3 respectively).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jan 2020
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 13, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 10, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 13, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 7, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 16, 2022
CompletedAugust 9, 2022
December 1, 2021
1.9 years
March 7, 2022
August 8, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Live birth rate
calculated as the number of live births (defined as at least one live born after 28 weeks of gestation) divided by the total number of patients who performed pregnancy tests.
28 gestational weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Serum E2 level
2-3 weeks
Endometrial thickness
2-3 weeks
Fertilization rate
1 day after oocyte retrieval
Number of day 3 embryos
3 days after oocyte retrieval
Clinical pregnancy rate
2 weeks after positive pregnancy test
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Poseidon Group 4A & 3A
EXPERIMENTAL80 eligible infertile women fulfilling the criteria of Poseidon Group 4 (35 years or more and AMH \<1.2ng/ml) will be randomized into Group 4A will receive controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and growth hormone (GH) and Group 4B will receive COS only. Similarly, 80 eligible infertile women fulfilling the criteria of Poseidon Group 3 (less than 35 years and AMH \<1.2ng/ml) will be randomized into Group 3A will receive COS and GH and Group 3B will receive COS only.
poseidon Group 4B & 3B
NO INTERVENTION80 eligible infertile women fulfilling the criteria of Poseidon Group 4 (35 years or more and AMH \<1.2ng/ml) will be randomized into Group 4A will receive controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and growth hormone (GH) and Group 4B will receive COS only. Similarly, 80 eligible infertile women fulfilling the criteria of Poseidon Group 3 (less than 35 years and AMH \<1.2ng/ml) will be randomized into Group 3A will receive COS and GH and Group 3B will receive COS only.
Interventions
In GH groups (Group 4A \& 3A), patients will receive additional treatment with GH (Somatropin, 4 IU/day, subcutaneous injection), daily beginning on the initial day of gonadotropin stimulation until triggering the oocyte maturation by hCG. Control groups (Group 4B \& 3B) will receive only standard COS without GH supplementation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Infertile women aged 20-45 years.
- AFC \<5.
- AMH level \<1.2 ng/ml.
- Have two normal ovaries and normal uterine cavity.
You may not qualify if:
- Body mass index (BMI) \>30 kg/m2.
- Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) \> 15 IU/L.
- History of abnormal karyotype in one or both partners.
- Endocrine, metabolic or autoimmune disorders, such as diabetes, thyroid disorder, and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
- Women with a known medical disease (e.g. severe hypertension or hepatic disease).
- Endometriosis.
- Previous ovarian surgery.
- Current or history of malignancies, chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
- Severe male actor (total motile sperm count \<1Ă—106 or normal morphology \<1%)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
faculty of medicine, Alexandria University
Alexandria, 21131, Egypt
Related Publications (7)
Oudendijk JF, Yarde F, Eijkemans MJ, Broekmans FJ, Broer SL. The poor responder in IVF: is the prognosis always poor?: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):1-11. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr037. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
PMID: 21987525BACKGROUNDAbu-Musa A, Haahr T, Humaidan P. Novel Physiology and Definition of Poor Ovarian Response; Clinical Recommendations. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Mar 19;21(6):2110. doi: 10.3390/ijms21062110.
PMID: 32204404BACKGROUNDHumaidan P, Alviggi C, Fischer R, Esteves SC. The novel POSEIDON stratification of 'Low prognosis patients in Assisted Reproductive Technology' and its proposed marker of successful outcome. F1000Res. 2016 Dec 23;5:2911. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.10382.1. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 28232864BACKGROUNDPoseidon Group (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number); Alviggi C, Andersen CY, Buehler K, Conforti A, De Placido G, Esteves SC, Fischer R, Galliano D, Polyzos NP, Sunkara SK, Ubaldi FM, Humaidan P. A new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept. Fertil Steril. 2016 Jun;105(6):1452-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 26. No abstract available.
PMID: 26921622BACKGROUNDXu YM, Hao GM, Gao BL. Application of Growth Hormone in in vitro Fertilization. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Jul 23;10:502. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00502. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31396161BACKGROUNDLi XL, Wang L, Lv F, Huang XM, Wang LP, Pan Y, Zhang XM. The influence of different growth hormone addition protocols to poor ovarian responders on clinical outcomes in controlled ovary stimulation cycles: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(12):e6443. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006443.
PMID: 28328856BACKGROUNDYang P, Wu R, Zhang H. The effect of growth hormone supplementation in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF or ICSI: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020 Jul 29;18(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12958-020-00632-w.
PMID: 32727608BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sherif Anis, phD
Alexandria University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 7, 2022
First Posted
March 16, 2022
Study Start
January 13, 2020
Primary Completion
December 10, 2021
Study Completion
February 13, 2022
Last Updated
August 9, 2022
Record last verified: 2021-12