Cryoneurolysis for the Management of Chronic Pain in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
1 other identifier
interventional
87
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pain is the principal symptom in knee osteoarthritis (OA) and results in a considerable amount of years lived with disability, emotional distress and has significant socioeconomic consequences. Conservative treatment options, such as exercise, often fail to provide long-term pain relief and alternatively patients may be subjected to total knee arthroplasty. More than 20% of these patients experience persistent and unchanged pain post-surgery. Novel advances in the field of cryoneurolysis applies low temperatures to disrupt nerve signaling at the painful area and a recent study showed that it was possible to target the peripheral nerves in the knee and provide significant pain relief in patients with knee OA. This could potentially improve the efficacy of other therapies such as exercise, delaying or perhaps avoiding surgical intervention and improving quality of life in OA patients considerably. Further prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm the effects of cryoneurolysis treatment in patients with knee OA. The primary objective of the current project is to determine the effectiveness of cryoneurolysis in its ability to decrease pain in patients with knee OA. The secondary objective is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cryoneurolysis in its ability to improve outcomes in the GLA:D program to potentially delay or avoid surgical intervention. 90 individuals with knee OA in the knee will be randomly allocated in either a cryoneurolysis intervention group or a sham group. Both groups will be assessed at baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up. The patients, therapists and data-manager will be blinded to the allocation. The primary outcome will be VAS knee pain intensity score, measured post cryoneurolysis treatment. Secondary outcome measures include functional performance, PRO-data (KOOS, EQ5D), analgesic use, a socio-economic evaluation and adverse effects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable chronic-pain
Started Jun 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable chronic-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 3, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 12, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 26, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2023
CompletedOctober 15, 2024
October 1, 2024
3.7 years
December 3, 2018
October 11, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in NRS knee pain intensity score
NRS consists of a numerical, from 0 to 10, anchored by two verbal descriptors, "no pain" for the score of zero and "worst pain imaginable" for the score of 10. NRS is a self-reported tool where the respondent is asked their current pain intensity.
Change in NRS pain score, between baseline and two weeks post surgery
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Change in Pain location
Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in Functional Performance Evaluated by the 30 second chair-stand test.
Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in use of Analgesics
Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Number of Adverse effects
Reported adverse effects 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in Pain type
Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
CRYO
EXPERIMENTALSubjected to Cryoneurolysis treatment and Neuromuscular training (GLA:D).
SHAM
SHAM COMPARATORSubjected to similar procedures as CRYO, but without freezing temperatures. Subjected to Neuromuscular training (GLA:D).
Interventions
A cryoprobe will be inserted percutaneously and freeze the target nerves (infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve \& anterior femoral cutaneous nerve) guided by ultrasound visualization.
The GLA:D program, is a standard education and exercise program for patients with osteoarthritis in Denmark. The program is performed in groups and with the supervision of an experienced physiotherapist specialized in training of musculoskeletal disorders.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Referred to GLA:D by a physician.
- Age ≥ 18y
- Chronic knee pain for a minimum duration of 6 months.
- Pain intensity ≥ 40mm on a 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS).
- Radiographic confirmation of osteoarthritis; Grade 2-4 changes according to the Kellgren Lawrence classification system
- A decrease of ≥ 50 % in VAS scores with diagnostic genicular nerve block.
- Written and oral understanding of Danish.
You may not qualify if:
- History of systemic inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis.
- Previous recipient of cryoneurolysis for the knee.
- Use of hyaluronic acid within the previous 30 days.
- Injection of corticosteroid within the previous 3 months.
- Clinical significant structural abnormities affecting locomotion and knee function aside from osteoarthritis and which might cause chronic knee pain.
- Body mass index ≥ 18 and ≤ 40 kg/m
- In treatment for other pain conditions.
- Pregnancy
- Coagulopathy
- Uncontrolled serious disease (cancer, diabetes, etc.)
- Disease associated with reactions to cold, such as cryoglobulinemia, cold urticarial and Renaud's syndrome.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital of Southwest Jutland
Esbjerg, Region Syddanmark, 6700, Denmark
Related Publications (10)
SUNDERLAND S. A classification of peripheral nerve injuries producing loss of function. Brain. 1951 Dec;74(4):491-516. doi: 10.1093/brain/74.4.491. No abstract available.
PMID: 14895767BACKGROUNDIlfeld BM, Preciado J, Trescot AM. Novel cryoneurolysis device for the treatment of sensory and motor peripheral nerves. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016 Aug;13(8):713-25. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2016.1204229. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
PMID: 27333989BACKGROUNDRadnovich R, Scott D, Patel AT, Olson R, Dasa V, Segal N, Lane NE, Shrock K, Naranjo J, Darr K, Surowitz R, Choo J, Valadie A, Harrell R, Wei N, Metyas S. Cryoneurolysis to treat the pain and symptoms of knee osteoarthritis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 Aug;25(8):1247-1256. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
PMID: 28336454BACKGROUNDTrescot AM. Cryoanalgesia in interventional pain management. Pain Physician. 2003 Jul;6(3):345-60.
PMID: 16880882BACKGROUNDSkou ST, Roos EM. Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D): evidence-based education and supervised neuromuscular exercise delivered by certified physiotherapists nationwide. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Feb 7;18(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1439-y.
PMID: 28173795BACKGROUNDDasa V, Lensing G, Parsons M, Harris J, Volaufova J, Bliss R. Percutaneous freezing of sensory nerves prior to total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2016 Jun;23(3):523-8. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
PMID: 26875052BACKGROUNDLewis GN, Rice DA, McNair PJ, Kluger M. Predictors of persistent pain after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Apr;114(4):551-61. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu441. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
PMID: 25542191BACKGROUNDO'Brien T, Breivik H. The impact of chronic pain-European patients' perspective over 12 months. Scand J Pain. 2012 Jan 1;3(1):23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2011.11.004.
PMID: 29913762BACKGROUNDAgeberg E, Link A, Roos EM. Feasibility of neuromuscular training in patients with severe hip or knee OA: the individualized goal-based NEMEX-TJR training program. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jun 17;11:126. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-126.
PMID: 20565735BACKGROUNDNygaard NB, Koch-Jensen C, Vaegter HB, Wedderkopp N, Blichfeldt-Eckhardt M, Gram B. Cryoneurolysis for the management of chronic pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis; a double-blinded randomized controlled sham trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 26;22(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04102-1.
PMID: 33637085DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bibi (Valgerdur) Gram, PhD
Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Carsten Kock-Jensen, MD
Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Niels-Peter B Nielsen, PhD
Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Post doc, Research employee
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2018
First Posted
December 12, 2018
Study Start
June 26, 2019
Primary Completion
March 1, 2023
Study Completion
March 1, 2023
Last Updated
October 15, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10