Mechanism and Dosimetry Exploration in TES Magnetic Resonance Current Mapping Methods
TES
2 other identifiers
interventional
123
1 country
2
Brief Summary
In this study the investigators will explore dosimetry in transcranial electrical stimulation using a novel magnetic resonance imaging technique that can determine how electrical stimulation distributes within the brain. The investigators will then combine this imaging technique with functional MR imaging to attempt mechanistic associations. If successful, the study outcomes will be an improved understanding of the interactions between electric current distributions and structures presumed to be targeted by stimulation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 11, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 3, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 9, 2022
CompletedJune 27, 2022
June 1, 2022
3.4 years
December 10, 2018
June 24, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Replicability
MREIT data will be obtained multiple times for each subject
3 weeks
Comparison of measured current distribution with fMRI result
Measured current distributions will be correlated with fMRI results and task accuracies
2 weeks
Study Arms (7)
Current Intensity 1 mA
ACTIVE COMPARATORtDCS will be administered at an intensity of 1 mA to locations F3-F4, and fMRI response during performance of a 3-back/0-back memory task will be assessed.
Sham 1 mA
SHAM COMPARATORDetermine fMRI response during performance of a 3-back/0-back memory task with sham 1 mA tDCS.
Current Intensity 1.5 mA
ACTIVE COMPARATORtDCS will be administered at an intensity of 1.5 mA to locations F3-F4, and fMRI response during performance of a 3-back/0-back memory task will be assessed.
Sham 1.5 mA
SHAM COMPARATORDetermine fMRI response during performance of a 3-back/0-back memory task with sham 1.5 mA tDCS.
Current Intensity 2 mA
ACTIVE COMPARATORtDCS will be administered at an intensity of 2 mA to locations F3-F4, and fMRI response during performance of a 3-back/0-back memory task will be assessed.
Sham 2 mA
SHAM COMPARATORDetermine fMRI response during performance of a 3-back/0-back memory task with sham 2 mA tDCS.
Structural, Diffusion and MREIT Imaging
EXPERIMENTALStructural and High angular resolution diffusion weighted imaging will be performed. Magnetic Resonance Electrical Impedance Tomography imaging will be performed using electrode locations F3-F4.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- We will include neurologically normal volunteer subjects between 18-30 years of age in the study, minors will not be targeted.
- English as Native Language
You may not qualify if:
- Adults who are unable to consent will not be included in the study.
- Pregnancy
- Subjects will not have any implanted or attached metallic devices.
- Appreciable deficits in hearing
- Appreciable problems with articulation
- Neuroanatomic abnormality
- Any neurological disorder associated with cognitive impairment.
- Any implanted cardiac pacemaker
- Dementia or Mini-Mental State Exam \<24
- Low estimated verbal intelligence per WTAR
- Active or Prior history of Seizure Disorder
- Family History of Seizure disorder
- Prescribed Seizure inducing medication
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Arizona State University
Tempe, Arizona, 85287-9709, United States
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32611, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rosalind J Sadleir, PhD
Arizona State University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Device used to apply stimulation can be operated in SHAM mode, where subject experiences sensation of the tDCS stimulation starting, but the device is turned off shortly after SHAM mode initiates.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2018
First Posted
December 11, 2018
Study Start
January 3, 2019
Primary Completion
May 31, 2022
Study Completion
June 9, 2022
Last Updated
June 27, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- After analysis and deidentification, data will be uploaded to NDAR
- Access Criteria
- Available to qualified researchers.
Data will be shared via the NIMH Data Archive (NDAR)