NCT03771950

Brief Summary

The aim is to evaluate the study design, procedure and measurements in a randomised controlled pilot study.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 27, 2018

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 11, 2018

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2019

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

December 11, 2018

Status Verified

December 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

November 27, 2018

Last Update Submit

December 9, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

rehabilitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Numbers of patients who meet the inclusion criteria and accept participation in the study?

    Count how many of the patients want to participate in the study

    16 weeks after trauma

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Numbers of participants who respond to the included measurements?

    16 weeks after trauma

  • Numbers of participants who complete post-test?

    16 weeks after trauma

  • Rivermead post-concussion symtoms questionnaire (Swedish version) (RPQ)

    Effect size of change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma

  • Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI)

    Effect size of change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma

  • Activity level is measured with GAP in everyday activity.

    Effect size of change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

Early team based neuro-rehabilitation after Traumatic Brain Injury

Behavioral: Early team based neuro-rehabilitation

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Treatment as usual.

Interventions

A structured interview will be made by OT about activity level, and an examination of the patients bodily and neurological symptoms will be made by PT. Based on this result a rehabilitation plan is established consisting of the patient's goals, and the purpose that the patient shall be as active as possible without triggering symptoms. An individual exercise program is prescribed. Between each appointment the patient will have personal tasks to accomplish with the purpose of being active based on symptoms and the adaptation to the current level of energy. The perceived symptoms will be logged. A week-schedule will be created in the purpose of helping the patient to a balanced activity level in relation to their current capacity. The PT assesses physical activity level and reactions to physical strain. Adaptations are made to the exercise program and advice is given on physical activity and exercises. When appropriate OT advices about returning to work and adaptations concerning work.

Intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Head injury for the first time or repeated trauma.
  • Diagnosed with brain concussion (ICD10 S060, S0600) by a physician.
  • Returned to previous activity daily living level as before trauma.
  • Other serious illness.
  • Unwillingness to participate in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Narhalsan Sorhaga Rehabmottagning

Alingsås, Vasta Gotaland, 44133, Sweden

Location

Related Publications (14)

  • Lannsjo M, af Geijerstam JL, Johansson U, Bring J, Borg J. Prevalence and structure of symptoms at 3 months after mild traumatic brain injury in a national cohort. Brain Inj. 2009 Mar;23(3):213-9. doi: 10.1080/02699050902748356.

    PMID: 19205957BACKGROUND
  • Lundin A, de Boussard C, Edman G, Borg J. Symptoms and disability until 3 months after mild TBI. Brain Inj. 2006 Jul;20(8):799-806. doi: 10.1080/02699050600744327.

    PMID: 17060147BACKGROUND
  • Belmont A, Agar N, Azouvi P. Subjective fatigue, mental effort, and attention deficits after severe traumatic brain injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Nov;23(9):939-44. doi: 10.1177/1545968309340327. Epub 2009 Jul 2.

    PMID: 19574545BACKGROUND
  • Ponsford J, Cameron P, Fitzgerald M, Grant M, Mikocka-Walus A. Long-term outcomes after uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury: a comparison with trauma controls. J Neurotrauma. 2011 Jun;28(6):937-46. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1516. Epub 2011 May 25.

    PMID: 21410321BACKGROUND
  • Middleboe T, Andersen HS, Birket-Smith M, Friis ML. Minor head injury: impact on general health after 1 year. A prospective follow-up study. Acta Neurol Scand. 1992 Jan;85(1):5-9.

    PMID: 1546534BACKGROUND
  • Ziino C, Ponsford J. Selective attention deficits and subjective fatigue following traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology. 2006 May;20(3):383-90. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.20.3.383.

    PMID: 16719631BACKGROUND
  • Cassidy JD, Cancelliere C, Carroll LJ, Cote P, Hincapie CA, Holm LW, Hartvigsen J, Donovan J, Nygren-de Boussard C, Kristman VL, Borg J. Systematic review of self-reported prognosis in adults after mild traumatic brain injury: results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3 Suppl):S132-51. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.299.

    PMID: 24581902BACKGROUND
  • Lannsjo M, Borg J, Bjorklund G, Af Geijerstam JL, Lundgren-Nilsson A. Internal construct validity of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire. J Rehabil Med. 2011 Nov;43(11):997-1002. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0875.

    PMID: 22031345BACKGROUND
  • Smets EM, Garssen B, Bonke B, De Haes JC. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychosom Res. 1995 Apr;39(3):315-25. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)00125-o.

    PMID: 7636775BACKGROUND
  • Mannerkorpi K, Hernelid C. Leisure Time Physical Activity Instrument and Physical Activity at Home and Work Instrument. Development, face validity, construct validity and test-retest reliability for subjects with fibromyalgia. Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Jun 17;27(12):695-701. doi: 10.1080/09638280400009063.

    PMID: 16012062BACKGROUND
  • Akerstedt T, Knutsson A, Westerholm P, Theorell T, Alfredsson L, Kecklund G. Sleep disturbances, work stress and work hours: a cross-sectional study. J Psychosom Res. 2002 Sep;53(3):741-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00333-1.

    PMID: 12217447BACKGROUND
  • Hays RD, Morales LS. The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life. Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):350-7. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002089.

    PMID: 11491194BACKGROUND
  • Lisspers J, Nygren A, Soderman E. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD): some psychometric data for a Swedish sample. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997 Oct;96(4):281-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb10164.x.

    PMID: 9350957BACKGROUND
  • Sawilowsky S. New Effect Size Rules of Thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods [Internet]. 2009 Nov 1;8(2). Available from: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/jmasm/vol8/iss2/26 OCH Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Second edition. Hillsdale: Routlegde; 1988.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Brain Injuries, TraumaticBrain Concussion

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain InjuriesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesCraniocerebral TraumaTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and InjuriesHead Injuries, ClosedWounds, Nonpenetrating

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
After screening for eligibility, fulfilling inclusion criteria and consenting to participation the baseline assessment will be conducted by an OT at enrolment. After this the patients will be randomised either to the intervention or control group in using lots in sealed envelopes based on a computer generated group allocation. The lots are kept in sealed envelopes prepared by a person not involved in the study. An OT will open the envelope and inform the patient about group allocation. All care providers will be blinded for baseline and post-test outcomes. A research co-worker who are involved in data management will be blinded for group allocation.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2018

First Posted

December 11, 2018

Study Start

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion

January 1, 2021

Study Completion

January 1, 2021

Last Updated

December 11, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-12

Locations