Study Stopped
Lack of enrollment
Inpatient Versus Outpatient Cervical Ripening
Inpatient Versus Outpatient Transcervical Foley Catheter Use for Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Induction of labor is a process of stimulating uterine contractions before the onset of labor, with a goal of achieving vaginal birth. The cervix (the lower part of the uterus that connects to the vagina) must dilate (open) in order to allow passage of the baby into the vagina and through the birth canal. A process called "cervical ripening" is often performed prior to labor induction to prepare the cervix for labor and therefore shorten the length of the labor. There are various pharmacologic and mechanical methods of cervical ripening that result in the physical softening and distensibility of the cervix. Mechanical dilation with a small balloon (i.e. a Foley catheter) placed in the cervix is one of the most commonly used, safe, inexpensive, and effective methods to achieve cervical ripening. In most hospitals, cervical ripening is performed in the hospitals; however, some hospitals allow women to undergo cervical ripening at home with a transcervical Foley catheter. The goal of this study is to compare the use of a Foley catheter for cervical ripening in the inpatient (in-hospital) and outpatient (at home) settings. We anticipate that outpatient use will lead to a shorter amount of time that a woman spends in the hospital, decreased cost, and good patient satisfaction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 4, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 12, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 7, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2021
CompletedApril 14, 2021
April 1, 2021
4.2 years
October 12, 2017
April 11, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Difference in time on labor and delivery
To evaluate the difference in the amount of time a patient spends on labor and delivery during induction of labor when undergoing inpatient versus outpatient transcervical Foley catheter for induction of labor.
(approximately) 2 days
Difference in cost
To compare the difference in cost for hospitalization in patients undergoing inpatient versus outpatient cervical ripening with a transcervical Foley catheter.
(approximately 5 days)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Patient satisfaction
(approximately 5 days)
Provider satisfaction
(approximately 3 years)
Length of labor induction
(approximately 3 days)
Type of delivery
(approximately 3 days)
Maternal blood loss
(approximately 3 days)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (4)
NICU admission
(approximately 5 days)
Neonatal fever
(approximately 5 days)
Total time on pitocin
(approximately 3 days)
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Inpatient Foley catheter
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects will be admitted to a room on labor and delivery and will be monitored with the external fetal monitor (EFM) and tocometer (a device to monitor contractions). If she is contracting less than every 2 minutes, intravenous (IV) Pitocin will be started at 2 milliunits/minute and increased per hospital protocol. While on pitocin, she will remain on continuous EFM and tocometer. She will also be kept on a clear liquid diet with intravenous fluids per standard protocol. If the Foley catheter has not been expulsed in 24 hours, it will be removed. After expulsion or removal of the Foley catheter, induction may proceed as deemed clinically appropriate by the managing physician. No further cervical ripening will be performed after the Foley catheter is expulsed/removed, or after 24 hours.
Outpatient Foley catheter
EXPERIMENTALSubjects are asked to return to the hospital \~12 hours after placement. Subjects are to return to the hospital if they develop heavy vaginal bleeding, decreased fetal movement, rupture of membranes, or increasingly painful or frequent contractions requiring an epidural or pain relief. Once admitted, subjects will be evaluated for expulsion of the catheter. If the catheter is in place IV Pitocin will be started. If the catheter has been expulsed, the induction will proceed as deemed clinically appropriate. After 24 hours, if the Foley catheter is still in the cervix it will be removed and the induction will proceed as deemed clinically appropriate.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pregnancies at least 37 weeks' gestation, undergoing induction of labor, with an unfavorable cervix, defined as a Bishop score ≤ 6
- The fetus must be in the cephalic presentation
- Indications for induction of labor include, but are not limited to, the following:
- Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks' gestation
- Intrauterine growth restriction
- Chronic hypertension
- Diabetes
- Gestational diabetes
- Prior stillbirth
- Other medical indications for induction of labor, as deemed appropriate by the obstetric provider, such as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Cholestasis of Pregnancy etc.
You may not qualify if:
- Gestational hypertension
- Preeclampsia
- Non-reassuring fetal testing
- Multi-fetal gestation
- Oligohydramnios
- Fetal anomaly
- Less than 37 weeks
- Bishop score \> 6
- Ruptured membranes
- Contraindication to vaginal delivery including: active Herpes lesion, HIV VL \>1000 copies/mL, placenta previa, vasa previa, breech presentation, prior classical cesarean section or transfundal myomectomy
- Poor access to telephone or transportation
- Latex allergy
- Any other condition for which the managing physician or investigator deem outpatient management inappropriate.
- Currently participating in another clinical trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- LifeBridge Healthlead
- Thomas Jefferson Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Sinai Hospital of Baltimore
Baltimore, Maryland, 21224, United States
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
Related Publications (10)
Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: final data for 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015 Jan 15;64(1):1-65.
PMID: 25603115BACKGROUNDHamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: Final Data for 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015 Dec;64(12):1-64.
PMID: 26727629BACKGROUNDSmith R. Parturition. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 18;356(3):271-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra061360. No abstract available.
PMID: 17229954BACKGROUNDThomas J, Fairclough A, Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ. Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 19;2014(6):CD003101. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003101.pub3.
PMID: 24941907BACKGROUNDJozwiak M, Bloemenkamp KW, Kelly AJ, Mol BW, Irion O, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub2.
PMID: 22419277BACKGROUNDBISHOP EH. PELVIC SCORING FOR ELECTIVE INDUCTION. Obstet Gynecol. 1964 Aug;24:266-8. No abstract available.
PMID: 14199536BACKGROUNDACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Aug;114(2 Pt 1):386-397. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5. No abstract available.
PMID: 19623003BACKGROUNDvon Gruenigen VE, Powell DM, Sorboro S, McCarroll ML, Kim U. The financial performance of labor and delivery units. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;209(1):17-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.019. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
PMID: 23410692BACKGROUNDSciscione AC, Muench M, Pollock M, Jenkins TM, Tildon-Burton J, Colmorgen GH. Transcervical Foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening in an outpatient versus inpatient setting. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Nov;98(5 Pt 1):751-6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01579-4.
PMID: 11704164BACKGROUNDAlfirevic Z, Gyte GM, Nogueira Pileggi V, Plachcinski R, Osoti AO, Finucane EM. Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 27;8(8):CD007372. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007372.pub4.
PMID: 32852803DERIVED
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 12, 2017
First Posted
December 7, 2018
Study Start
January 4, 2017
Primary Completion
April 1, 2021
Study Completion
April 1, 2021
Last Updated
April 14, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share