Study Stopped
Interim results showed high futility to continue
Web-based Attention Bias Modification Treatment for Childhood Anxiety Disorders
ATTENTIO
1 other identifier
interventional
55
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Anxiety disorders are the most common childhood psychiatric disorders, with prevalence rates as high as 15% to 20%. Success rates of the first choice treatment strategy (i.e. Cognitive Behavioural Therapy; CBT) are around 50%. Non-response increases the risk for other psychiatric disorders, school dropout, social isolation, alcoholism, and suicide attempts. These negative consequences endorse the urgent need to develop more effective and accessible treatments that enhance effectiveness of current treatment options. A promising new treatment for childhood anxiety disorders is Attention Bias Modification Treatment (ABMT). ABMT is based on evidence that anxiety-disordered individuals selectively allocate their attention toward threatening information (i.e. attention bias). This bias in early and automatic attention processes starts a cascade of subsequent biases in information processing and memory, resulting in heightened anxiety. Attention bias is an underlying mechanism of anxiety. Thus ABMT, which implicitly trains individuals to attend away from threatening information should alleviate anxiety. In contrast to ABMT, CBT explicitly targets later stages of information processing that are under volitional control. Meta-analyses of studies in adults have shown that ABMT indeed results in increased recovery rates and clinically significant changes in anxiety, compared to so-called "sham" attention training (control condition). Imaging studies have shown that ABMT modifies lateral prefrontal cortex activity to emotional stimuli. Despite its promising results, fewer studies have examined ABMT in anxiety-disordered children. The aim of this trial is to enhance treatment effectiveness by combining web-based ABMT with CBT in a large sample of anxiety-disordered children. The primary aim is to compare ABMT-augmented CBT with CBT as monotherapy on recovery rates for anxiety disorders and changes in anxiety. The secondary aim is to compare ABMT with sham attention training on anxiety disorder recovery rates and changes in anxiety. We hypothesize that (1) ABMT-augmented CBT will result in a significantly better treatment success than CBT alone, and (2) ABMT will result in a significantly better treatment success than sham attention training. The design will be a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 5, 2018
CompletedDecember 5, 2018
December 1, 2018
3.3 years
November 30, 2018
December 4, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Anxiety disorder status
Free of any anxiety disorder according to the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADIS-C)
After 3 weeks of ABMT or sham-ABMT
Anxiety disorder status
Free of any anxiety disorder according to the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADIS-C)
After 10 weeks of CBT
Anxiety disorder status
Free of any anxiety disorder according to the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADIS-C)
6 months follow-up (from last CBT session)
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Number of anxiety disorders
After 3 weeks of ABMT or sham-ABMT, after 10 weeks of CBT, 6 months follow-up
Anxiety symptoms
After 3 weeks of ABMT or sham-ABMT, after 10 weeks of CBT, 6 months follow-up
Depression symptoms
After 3 weeks of ABMT or sham-ABMT, after 10 weeks of CBT, 6 months follow-up
Number of anxiety disorders
After 10 weeks of CBT
Anxiety symptoms
After 10 weeks of CBT
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Combined ABMT and CBT
EXPERIMENTAL9 sessions of Attention Bias Modification Treatment (dot-probe based of 160 trials) followed by individual Cognitive Behavioral Therapy via FRIENDS program
Combined Sham ABMT and CBT
SHAM COMPARATOR9 sessions of Sham Attention Bias Modification Treatment (dot-probe based of 160 trials) followed by individual Cognitive Behavioral Therapy via FRIENDS program
Interventions
ABMT: A trial begins with a fixation cross (+) for 500 ms, immediately followed by a stimuli pair consisting of a neutral and threatening stimulus that is centred horizontally. Stimuli pairs consist of two faces, pictures or words. After presentation of the stimuli pair, a probe (: or ..) always appears on the location of the neutral stimulus. The probe remains on the screen until the participant presses the corresponding key (: or ..), after which the next trial begins. Each session, participants see 160 trials of which 128 trials include one neutral and one threatening stimulus. The remaining 32 trials include a neutral-neutral stimuli pair. CBT: FRIENDS program individual
ABMT: A trial begins with a fixation cross (+) for 500 ms, immediately followed by a stimuli pair consisting of a neutral and threatening stimulus that is centred horizontally. Stimuli pairs consist of two faces, pictures or words. After presentation of the stimuli pair, a probe (: or ..) always appears on the location of the neutral stimulus. The probe remains on the screen until the participant presses the corresponding key (: or ..), after which the next trial begins. Of the 160 trials, the probe appears with equal frequency on the location of the neutral and threatening stimulus (128 trials). The remaining 32 trials include a neutral-neutral stimuli pair. CBT: FRIENDS program individual
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Eligible for participation are children (aged 8 to 16 years)
- Primary diagnosis of separation anxiety disorder,
- Primary diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder
- Primary diagnosis of specific phobia
- Primary diagnosis of social phobia
You may not qualify if:
- IQ below 85
- poor command of the Dutch language
- serious physical disease
- psychosis
- substance abuse
- pervasive developmental disorder
- obsessive-compulsive disorder
- posttraumatic stress disorder
- acute stress disorder
- panic disorder
- major depression
- anxiety medication during treatment
- any concurrent psychotherapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3000 CB, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeroen Legerstee, PhD
Erasmus Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 30, 2018
First Posted
December 5, 2018
Study Start
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion
February 1, 2017
Study Completion
July 1, 2017
Last Updated
December 5, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-12