NCT03764644

Brief Summary

Anxiety disorders are the most common childhood psychiatric disorders, with prevalence rates as high as 15% to 20%. Success rates of the first choice treatment strategy (i.e. Cognitive Behavioural Therapy; CBT) are around 50%. Non-response increases the risk for other psychiatric disorders, school dropout, social isolation, alcoholism, and suicide attempts. These negative consequences endorse the urgent need to develop more effective and accessible treatments that enhance effectiveness of current treatment options. A promising new treatment for childhood anxiety disorders is Attention Bias Modification Treatment (ABMT). ABMT is based on evidence that anxiety-disordered individuals selectively allocate their attention toward threatening information (i.e. attention bias). This bias in early and automatic attention processes starts a cascade of subsequent biases in information processing and memory, resulting in heightened anxiety. Attention bias is an underlying mechanism of anxiety. Thus ABMT, which implicitly trains individuals to attend away from threatening information should alleviate anxiety. In contrast to ABMT, CBT explicitly targets later stages of information processing that are under volitional control. Meta-analyses of studies in adults have shown that ABMT indeed results in increased recovery rates and clinically significant changes in anxiety, compared to so-called "sham" attention training (control condition). Imaging studies have shown that ABMT modifies lateral prefrontal cortex activity to emotional stimuli. Despite its promising results, fewer studies have examined ABMT in anxiety-disordered children. The aim of this trial is to enhance treatment effectiveness by combining web-based ABMT with CBT in a large sample of anxiety-disordered children. The primary aim is to compare ABMT-augmented CBT with CBT as monotherapy on recovery rates for anxiety disorders and changes in anxiety. The secondary aim is to compare ABMT with sham attention training on anxiety disorder recovery rates and changes in anxiety. We hypothesize that (1) ABMT-augmented CBT will result in a significantly better treatment success than CBT alone, and (2) ABMT will result in a significantly better treatment success than sham attention training. The design will be a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
55

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2013

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2017

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 30, 2018

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 5, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

December 5, 2018

Status Verified

December 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

November 30, 2018

Last Update Submit

December 4, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Anxiety disorder status

    Free of any anxiety disorder according to the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADIS-C)

    After 3 weeks of ABMT or sham-ABMT

  • Anxiety disorder status

    Free of any anxiety disorder according to the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADIS-C)

    After 10 weeks of CBT

  • Anxiety disorder status

    Free of any anxiety disorder according to the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADIS-C)

    6 months follow-up (from last CBT session)

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Number of anxiety disorders

    After 3 weeks of ABMT or sham-ABMT, after 10 weeks of CBT, 6 months follow-up

  • Anxiety symptoms

    After 3 weeks of ABMT or sham-ABMT, after 10 weeks of CBT, 6 months follow-up

  • Depression symptoms

    After 3 weeks of ABMT or sham-ABMT, after 10 weeks of CBT, 6 months follow-up

  • Number of anxiety disorders

    After 10 weeks of CBT

  • Anxiety symptoms

    After 10 weeks of CBT

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Combined ABMT and CBT

EXPERIMENTAL

9 sessions of Attention Bias Modification Treatment (dot-probe based of 160 trials) followed by individual Cognitive Behavioral Therapy via FRIENDS program

Behavioral: Combined ABMT and CBT

Combined Sham ABMT and CBT

SHAM COMPARATOR

9 sessions of Sham Attention Bias Modification Treatment (dot-probe based of 160 trials) followed by individual Cognitive Behavioral Therapy via FRIENDS program

Behavioral: Combined Sham ABMT and CBT

Interventions

ABMT: A trial begins with a fixation cross (+) for 500 ms, immediately followed by a stimuli pair consisting of a neutral and threatening stimulus that is centred horizontally. Stimuli pairs consist of two faces, pictures or words. After presentation of the stimuli pair, a probe (: or ..) always appears on the location of the neutral stimulus. The probe remains on the screen until the participant presses the corresponding key (: or ..), after which the next trial begins. Each session, participants see 160 trials of which 128 trials include one neutral and one threatening stimulus. The remaining 32 trials include a neutral-neutral stimuli pair. CBT: FRIENDS program individual

Combined ABMT and CBT

ABMT: A trial begins with a fixation cross (+) for 500 ms, immediately followed by a stimuli pair consisting of a neutral and threatening stimulus that is centred horizontally. Stimuli pairs consist of two faces, pictures or words. After presentation of the stimuli pair, a probe (: or ..) always appears on the location of the neutral stimulus. The probe remains on the screen until the participant presses the corresponding key (: or ..), after which the next trial begins. Of the 160 trials, the probe appears with equal frequency on the location of the neutral and threatening stimulus (128 trials). The remaining 32 trials include a neutral-neutral stimuli pair. CBT: FRIENDS program individual

Combined Sham ABMT and CBT

Eligibility Criteria

Age8 Years - 16 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Eligible for participation are children (aged 8 to 16 years)
  • Primary diagnosis of separation anxiety disorder,
  • Primary diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder
  • Primary diagnosis of specific phobia
  • Primary diagnosis of social phobia

You may not qualify if:

  • IQ below 85
  • poor command of the Dutch language
  • serious physical disease
  • psychosis
  • substance abuse
  • pervasive developmental disorder
  • obsessive-compulsive disorder
  • posttraumatic stress disorder
  • acute stress disorder
  • panic disorder
  • major depression
  • anxiety medication during treatment
  • any concurrent psychotherapy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital

Rotterdam, South Holland, 3000 CB, Netherlands

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anxiety DisordersPhobia, SpecificPhobia, SocialGeneralized Anxiety Disorder

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mental DisordersPhobic Disorders

Study Officials

  • Jeroen Legerstee, PhD

    Erasmus Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Double blind, sham-controlled, randomized trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2018

First Posted

December 5, 2018

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion

February 1, 2017

Study Completion

July 1, 2017

Last Updated

December 5, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-12

Locations