Short-term Effects of Physiotherapy on LCI
SPICy
Short-term Effects of Positive Expiratory Pressure Mask on Ventilation Inhomogeneity in Children and Adolescents With Cystic Fibrosis
1 other identifier
interventional
19
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Although some studies have brought some evidences about the efficacy of positive expiratory pressure (PEP)-mask therapy as an airway clearance technique, yet it is not clearly understood what is the contribution of this technique in modifying peripheral ventilation inhomogeneity, a typical feature of patients with Cystic Fibrosis (CF). The aim of this study is to investigate how PEP-MASK affects ventilation inhomogeneity in children and adolescents, with moderate to normal CF lung disease by the change in acinar airways (Sacin), lung clearance index (LCI) and conductive airways (Scond) indexes derived from nitrogen multiple-breath washout test (N2MBW).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 21, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 7, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 30, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedDecember 29, 2022
December 1, 2022
5.7 years
November 7, 2018
December 28, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Effect of PEP-MASK on ventilation heterogeneity (Sacin)
Acinar airways (Sacin) mean difference between treatments
Right after intervention/sham procedure
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Effect of PEP-MASK on ventilation heterogeneity (Scond)
Right after intervention/sham procedure
Effect of PEP-MASK on ventilation heterogeneity (LCI)
Right after intervention/sham procedure
Sputum weight
From the beginning to the end of each intervention/sham procedure
Oxygen saturation
From the beginning to the end of each intervention/sham procedure
Study Arms (2)
PEP standard
ACTIVE COMPARATORPEP sham
SHAM COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- CF diagnosis
- Patients hospitalized for a scheduled intravenous antibiotics cycle and regularly followed-up by the CF Centre
- ≥ 15 kilograms
- FEV1 ≥ 40%predicted
- Ability to perform NMBW test
- Ability to perform spirometry
- Willing to adhere to protocol procedures
- Patients in treatment with PEP-MASK
You may not qualify if:
- Pulmonary Exacerbation within two last week
- Burkholderia cepacia infection
- Patients in lung transplantation waiting list
- Patients undergoing non invasive mechanical ventilation or oxygen therapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Meyer
Florence, Italy
Centro Regionale di Riferimento Fibrosi Cistica
Milan, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Crapo R, Enright P, van der Grinten CP, Gustafsson P, Jensen R, Johnson DC, MacIntyre N, McKay R, Navajas D, Pedersen OF, Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Wanger J; ATS/ERS Task Force. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005 Aug;26(2):319-38. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805. No abstract available.
PMID: 16055882BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Carla Colombo
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Technicians performing multiple-breath washout tests are blinded to treatment allocation; physiotherapists performing the treatment are blinded to multiple breath washout results; patients are blinded to the purpose of the study; the statistician will be blind to treatment allocation together with outcome assessors.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 7, 2018
First Posted
November 30, 2018
Study Start
November 21, 2016
Primary Completion
August 1, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
December 29, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-12