NCT03759444

Brief Summary

The objective of the study was to determine how patients with eating disorders perceive time, and in particular whether their experience of time differs from that of healthy individuals. Another goal was to examine the relationship between the mood of the subjects and their time perspective. The subjects were 30 women with eating disorders and 30 age-matched healthy female controls. The three measures applied were: the Time Metaphors Questionnaire by Sobol-Kwapinska, the Time Perspective Inventory by Zimbardo, and the UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist (UMACL) by Matthews et al.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2014

Typical duration for all trials

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2014

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 30, 2017

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 20, 2018

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 30, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

November 30, 2018

Status Verified

November 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

November 20, 2018

Last Update Submit

November 28, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Perception of timeEating disordersEgo-syntonicityExistential sufferingPsychotherapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • The Time Metaphors Questionnaire by Sobol-Kwapińska

    The measure consists of 95 items formulated as metaphors describing ideas eliciting strong emotions. The subjects are asked to rate the items on a scale from 1 to 4, depending on the degree to which a given metaphor is consistent with their perception of time. The items are grouped into 3 scales reflecting positive attitudes to time: Friendly Time (subdivided into two subscales: Constructive Time and Pleasant Time), Significance of the Moment, and Subtle Time, as well as four scales covering negative attitudes to time: Hostile Time (with three subscales: Finiteness of Time, Bitter Time, and Confusion in Time), Rapid Passage of Time, Wild Time, and Empty Time. The questionnaire reveals satisfactory reliability and validity.

    1.05.2014-30.06.2017

  • Time Perspective Inventory by Zimbardo

    The measure consists of 56 items which the respondents rate on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very uncharacteristic of me) to 5 (very characteristic of me). The questionnaire tests 5 time perspectives: 1) Past-Negative, 2) Past-Positive, 3) Present-Hedonistic, 4) Present-Fatalistic, and 5) Future. The Polish version of this instrument has been reported to have both good reliability and validity.

    1.05.2014-30.06.2017

  • Transcendental Future Time Perspective Inventory

    This is a one-dimensional scale that consists of 10 items which the respondents rate on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very uncharacteristic of me) to 5 (very characteristic of me). It is used to assess individual attitudes and beliefs regarding the future, immediately following the imagined death of the physical body.

    1.05.2014-30.06.2017

  • The UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist (UMACL) by Matthews et al.

    The instrument measures mood understood as an affective experience of a duration of at least several minutes; its three scales are Tense Arousal, Energetic Arousal, and Hedonic Tone. The UMACL consists of a list of 29 adjectives which the respondents rate in terms of applicability to their current mood on a four-point scale from definitely yes to definitely not. The reliability and validity of the Polish adaptation has been confirmed.

    1.05.2014-30.06.2017

Study Arms (2)

women with eating disorders

women with eating disorders (age: M = 26.88; SD = 5.82) The three measures applied in this group were: the Time Metaphors Questionnaire by Sobol-Kwapinska (2007), the Time Perspective Inventory by Zimbardo (1999), and the UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist (UMACL) by Matthews et al. (1990).

Other: Questionnaires

healthy female controls.

healthy female controls (age: M = 24.27; SD = 6.49) The three measures applied in this group were: the Time Metaphors Questionnaire by Sobol-Kwapinska (2007), the Time Perspective Inventory by Zimbardo (1999), and the UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist (UMACL) by Matthews et al. (1990).

Other: Questionnaires

Interventions

The three questionnaires applied were: the Time Metaphors Questionnaire by Sobol-Kwapinska, the Time Perspective Inventory by Zimbardo, and the UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist (UMACL) by Matthews et al.

healthy female controls.women with eating disorders

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 40 Years
Sexfemale
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The clinical and control groups did not differ significantly in terms of age (t = 1.64, p = 0.100) or height (t = -0.54, p = 0.590). Obviously, significant differences were found in terms of weight and BMI (t = -2.93 and t = -3.03, p \< 0.01, respectively): women with eating disorders were much lighter (M = 50.78, SD = 13.05) and had a much lower BMI (M = 18.3, SD = 4.49) than healthy controls (M = 60.43, SD = 12.48, and M = 21.62, SD = 3.98, respectively). The mean duration of eating disorder was 8.9 years (SD = 5.23).

You may qualify if:

  • Clinical diagnosis of eating disorders (anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa)
  • Age between 18 and 40 years

You may not qualify if:

  • diagnosis of other (except eating disorders) mental disorder
  • Age below 18 years and above 40 years

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (5)

  • Gorynska E. UMACL Mood Adjective Checklist by G. Matthews, A.G. Chamberlain, D.M. Jones. Pracownia Testow Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego, Warszawa, 2005.

    RESULT
  • Matthews G, Jones DM, Chamberlain AG. Refining the measurement of mood: the UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist. British Journal of Psychology 81(1): 17-42, 1990.

    RESULT
  • Sobol-Kwapinska M. TMQ Time Metaphor Questionnaire: Manual. Pracownia Testow Psychologicznych PTP, Warszawa, 2008.

    RESULT
  • Zimbardo P G, Boyd J. The time paradox. PWN, Warszawa, 2009.

    RESULT
  • Zimbardo P, Boyd J. Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable individual differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77(6): 1271-1288, 1999.

    RESULT

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Feeding and Eating Disorders

Interventions

Surveys and Questionnaires

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Malgorzata Starzomska, dr

    Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2018

First Posted

November 30, 2018

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion

June 1, 2017

Study Completion

July 30, 2017

Last Updated

November 30, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share