Neuro 1 vs. Neuro 2 Sound Processors
Comparison of Audiometric Performance Between the Neuro 1 and Neuro 2 Sound Processors.
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the benefit of Neuro 1 sound processor upgrade in speech perfomance in adults. Half of participants will be tested with Neuro 1 first and Neuro 2, while the other half will be tested with Neuro 2 first and then Neuro 1.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 26, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 28, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 10, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 10, 2020
CompletedOctober 20, 2021
October 1, 2021
2 months
November 26, 2018
October 13, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
speech recognition in quiet
Hearing In Noise Test
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (2)
speech recognition in noise
Day 1
pure tone threshold
Day 1
Study Arms (2)
Neuro 2 Upgrade
EXPERIMENTALParticipant wears Neuro 1 sound processor and is tested, then is upgraded with the new sound processor Neuro 2 and tested.
Neuro 1 Downgrade
EXPERIMENTALParticipant wears Neuro 2 sound processor and is tested, then is downgraded with the sound processor Neuro 1 and tested.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- written informed consent
- primary implantation
- subject having participated to previous Neuro 1 sound processor study in Canada
- fluent in English, including reading and writing.
You may not qualify if:
- psychologically unsuitable
- unrealistic expectations regarding possible benefits, risks, and limitations that are inherent to the device
- non compliant with all investigational requirements.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Oticon Medicallead
Study Sites (1)
Nova Scotia Hearing and Speech centres
Halifax, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Peter Morris, MD
Dalhousie University, Halifax,NS, Canada
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 26, 2018
First Posted
November 28, 2018
Study Start
November 1, 2019
Primary Completion
January 10, 2020
Study Completion
January 10, 2020
Last Updated
October 20, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share