Physiotherapeutic Interventions Applied to the Bladder Pain Syndrome
The Effects of Physiotherapeutic Interventions Applied to the Bladder Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Control Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Related to urological and gynecological systems, patients with Bladdeer Pain Syndrome (BPS) often present pain, pressure and chronic discomfort in suprapubic and perineal area associated with low urinary tract symptoms. This condition can generates a negative impact in cognitive, social, behavioral and sexual quality of life. As Bladder Pain Syndrome originates from different causes and includes the genitourinary, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal and neuropsychological systems, a multidisciplinary approach is needed with doctors,physiotherapists, psychologists and others. Physiotherapeutic interventions are recommended as a conservative treatment for patients with BPS. The physiotherapeutic interventions include the use of Biofeedback to relax the pelvic floor muscles and manual therapy (myofascial trigger points release) to decrease muscle tension. Transcutaneous electrostimulation (TENS) is used to decrease the pain and postural exercises to improve the pelvic mobility. In this study, our hypothesis was that women with BPS presented musculoskeletal dysfunction, and we tested a different physiotherapy approach that was not being used. The reason for that understanding was the presence of refractory urinary and pain symptoms notwithstanding the physiotherapy conventional treatment, such as manual therapy and biofeedback. To test our hypothesis, we decided to add either TENS or postural exercises to the conventional treatment. The objective of this study was to verify the effects of biofeedback (BF) and manual therapy (MT) associated with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) or postural exercises (PE) in the treatment of bladder pain syndrome (BPS) in women regarding pain and urinary symptoms.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 5, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 11, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 28, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 19, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 19, 2019
CompletedMay 16, 2023
May 1, 2023
1.9 years
October 11, 2018
May 11, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pain symptoms
Change from Baseline in pain sympotms on the Visual Analog Scale after treatment
up to 3 months
Urinary symptoms
Change from Baseline in urinary symptoms on the O'Leary- Sant Urinary symptoms and problems score after treatment
up to 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Sexual activity
up to 3 months
Study Arms (3)
E-stim Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORTENS group was treated with biofeedback, manual therapy, andtranscutaneous electrostimulation (TENS), a peripheral neuromodulation to promote analgesia in pain areas, using two transcutaneous self-adhesive electrodes Axelgaard 5 cm x 5 cm with 2 cm of distance between them. The parameters used were frequency = 100 Hz, pulse width = 50-100 µs, and current intensity according to the patient's sensitivity.
Postural Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPostural group was treated with biofeedback, manual therapy, and postural exercises , which promoted pelvic mobility and functional training associated with respiratory exercises increasing the diaphragmatic excursion.Postural exercises consisted of 10 repetitions of breathing exercises in the lay-down position, 10 repetitions of hip anteversion and retroversion in the sitting position, and 10 repetitions of hip anteversion, retroversion, and lateral movement in the stand-up position.
Conventional Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional group was treated with biofeedback for pelvic floor relaxation and manual therapy to release the tension in the suprapubic, pelvic, and intravaginal areas. The manual therapy consisted of a myofascial trigger point release maneuver using digital pressure and muscle fiber stretching in pain areas. Biofeedback consisted of pelvic floor muscle coordination and relaxation exercises using intravaginal probes. The training program was initiated with 10 fast contractions with 5 seconds of relaxation between them followed by 10 sustained contractions of 5 seconds with 10 seconds of relaxation between them. Finally, one minute of pelvic floor relaxation was performed.
Interventions
breathing exercises in the lay-down position, hip anteversion and retroversion in the sitting position, and anteversion, retroversion, and lateral movement in the stand-up position
pelvic floor muscle coordination and relaxation exercises using intravaginal probes
myofascial trigger point release maneuver using digital pressure and muscle fiber stretching in pain areas
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidade de São Paulo
São Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Clarice Tanaka, PhD
University of Sao Paulo
- STUDY CHAIR
Homero Bruschini, PhD
University of Sao Paulo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- After the assessment, participants were blinded randomized by a mask researcher using random.org and allocated into three groups of treatment (TENS, Postural and Conventional) held over 10 sessions once a week.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 11, 2018
First Posted
November 28, 2018
Study Start
February 5, 2018
Primary Completion
December 19, 2019
Study Completion
December 19, 2019
Last Updated
May 16, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05