NCT03746002

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to examine whether administering metolazone 60 minutes prior to furosemide increases urine output compared with administering metolazone and furosemide concomitantly. Participants will have equal chance of being assigned to each group.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
3

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2019

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 15, 2018

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 19, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2019

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 10, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 10, 2020

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 22, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

October 22, 2021

Status Verified

September 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

November 15, 2018

Results QC Date

August 24, 2021

Last Update Submit

September 25, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

diureticmetolazonefurosemide

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • 24-Hour Urine Output

    Total measured urine output in milliliters produced after metolazone dose is given

    24 hours

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Change in Total Body Weight

    Baseline and at 12 to 23 hours after metolazone dose

  • Change in Serum Creatinine

    Baseline and at 12 to 23 hours after metolazone dose

  • Acute Kidney Injury

    Baseline and at 12 to 23 hours after metolazone dose

  • Hypokalemia

    Baseline and at 12 to 23 hours after metolazone dose

  • Hypomagnesemia

    Baseline and at 12 to 23 hours after metolazone dose

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Metolazone Pre-dosing

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Metolazone 5 mg by mouth administered 60 minutes prior to furosemide background therapy (120 - 160 mg intravenous bolus, followed by furosemide 120 - 160 mg intravenous bolus 12 - 24 hours after)

Drug: Metolazone 60 minutes prior to furosemide

Metolazone Concurrent Dosing

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Metolazone 5 mg by mouth administered at the same time as furosemide background therapy (120 - 160 mg intravenous bolus, followed by furosemide 120 - 160 mg intravenous bolus 12 - 24 hours after)

Drug: Metolazone concurrently with furosemide

Interventions

All patients will receive furosemide background therapy (furosemide 120 - 160 mg IV bolus dosed twice within a twenty four hour period. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to either metolazone 5 mg tablet dosed 60 minutes prior to first dose of furosemide or metolazone dosed concurrently (within ten minute time frame) with the first dose of furosemide.

Also known as: Zaroxolyn
Metolazone Pre-dosing

All patients will receive furosemide background therapy (furosemide 120 - 160 mg IV bolus dosed twice within a twenty four hour period. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to either metolazone 5 mg tablet dosed 60 minutes prior to first dose of furosemide or metolazone dosed concurrently (within ten minute time frame) with the first dose of furosemide.

Also known as: Zaroxolyn
Metolazone Concurrent Dosing

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 89 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Admission within 48 hours for acute decompensated heart failure with at least one symptom and one sign of volume overload
  • Receipt of loop diuretic prior to admission
  • Plan to administer furosemide 120 - 160 mg IV bolus twice daily over the next 24 hours with additional diuresis deemed necessary
  • If patient is concurrently administered intravenous vasodilator or inotrope, the dose of vasodilator or inotrope must be stable for 6 hours prior to enrollment with a plan to continue the same dose for the 24 hour duration of this study

You may not qualify if:

  • Metolazone prescribed prior to admission
  • Receipt of continuous intravenous infusion of furosemide
  • Cirrhosis or end stage renal disease
  • Non-English speaking patients

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Maryland Medical Center

Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Ellison DH, Felker GM. Diuretic Treatment in Heart Failure. N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 16;377(20):1964-1975. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1703100. No abstract available.

    PMID: 29141174BACKGROUND
  • Jentzer JC, DeWald TA, Hernandez AF. Combination of loop diuretics with thiazide-type diuretics in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Nov 2;56(19):1527-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.034.

    PMID: 21029871BACKGROUND
  • Grosskopf I, Rabinovitz M, Rosenfeld JB. Combination of furosemide and metolazone in the treatment of severe congestive heart failure. Isr J Med Sci. 1986 Nov;22(11):787-90.

    PMID: 3793436BACKGROUND
  • Ellison DH. The physiologic basis of diuretic synergism: its role in treating diuretic resistance. Ann Intern Med. 1991 May 15;114(10):886-94. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-10-886.

    PMID: 2014951BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Edema

Interventions

MetolazoneFurosemide

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

SulfonamidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsSulfonesSulfur CompoundsQuinazolinonesQuinazolinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsSulfanilamidesAniline CompoundsAmines

Limitations and Caveats

This study was terminated early due to slow enrollment, resulting in an inadequate sample size.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Brent Reed
Organization
University of Maryland School of Pharmacy

Study Officials

  • Brent Reed, PharmD

    University of Maryland, College Park

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Prospective, randomized, open-label, active control pilot study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor, Pharmacy Practice and Science

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2018

First Posted

November 19, 2018

Study Start

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion

January 10, 2020

Study Completion

January 10, 2020

Last Updated

October 22, 2021

Results First Posted

October 22, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations