Study Stopped
Very low recruitment rates
Forced Fluid Removal in High Risk Acute Kidney Injury
FFAKI
Forced Fluid Removal vs. Usual Intensive Care in High-risk Acute Kidney Injury With Severe Fluid Overload - A Randomized Controlled Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
21
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The objective of this pilot trial is to assess the feasibility of forced fluid removal in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with high-risk AKI and severe fluid overload. The intervention will use furosemide infusion and/or continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) to achieve and maintain a neutral cumulative fluid balance. The intervention will be compared to standard of care as reflected in the kidney disease improving global outcome (KDIGO) guidelines.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Oct 2015
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 21, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 8, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 8, 2017
CompletedJuly 6, 2017
July 1, 2017
1.7 years
May 21, 2015
July 3, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cumulative fluid balance
Calculated as the sum of daily intake - daily output, as registered on the daily ICU observation charts.
5 days
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Cumulative fluid balance
ICU stay expected average of 10 days
Mean daily fluid balance
ICU stay expected average of 10 days
Major protocol violations
ICU stay expected average of 10 days
Time to neutral cumulative fluid balance
90 days
Accumulated serious adverse reactions
90 days
Other Outcomes (5)
All cause mortality
90 days
Days alive and out of hospital
90 days
Days alive and out of mechanical ventilation
90 days
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Forced Fluid Removal
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental intervention is guided by a therapeutic goal of average negative fluid balance ≥ 1 ml/kg/h and safety variables indicating inadequate circulation (lactate ≥ 4, MAP \< 50 or mottling beyond the edge of kneecaps). The effect of fluid removal is evaluated three times daily (06:00. 14:00 and 22:00), while the safety variables are evaluated continuously. Resuscitation is started if one or more signs of inadequate circulation is present. The first choice for fluid removal is diuretic therapy with furosemide, which is continued for a minimum of 8 hours. If the therapeutic goal (negative fluid balance ≥ 1 ml/kg/h) is not achieved and/or maintained by furosemide alone, then fluid removal with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is initiated.
Usual Care
ACTIVE COMPARATORUsual Care at the discretion of the treating clinicians, except for the initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT).
Interventions
* Loading dose: 40 mg I.V. * Infusion rate 40 mg/h * Continued until neutral cumulative fluid balance is achieved (the overall treatment goal) or average negative fluid balance is below 1 ml/kg/h for 8 hours.
* Initiated in case of contraindications or inadequate effect of furosemide. * Fluid removal is started at 2 ml/kg/h * The efficacy is evaluated 3 times daily and removal rate increased by 0.5 ml/kg/h if the therapeutic goal is not achieved
The physiologic response to fluid removal is monitored with three variables indicating inadequate circulation. These are: * Mottling beyond the edge of kneecaps * Hypotension (MAP \< 50) resistant to inotropes and vasopressors * Plasma lactate ≥ 4 mmol/l Mottling and MAP are monitored continuously and lactate is measured routinely 4-6 times each day and on clinical indication. If one or more variable is present: 1. Fluid removal is paused 2. A crystalloid fluid bolus of 250-500 ml is given 3. Circulatory status is reevaluated within 30 minutes 4. Step 1-3 is repeated until signs of inadequate circulation have been resolved for minimum 1 hour 5. Fluid removal is restarted in 25% reduced dose for minimum 4 hours before evaluation of effect.
All interventions are performed at the discretion of the treating physician apart from initiation of renal replacement therapy which is discouraged unless one or more of the following criteria are met: * Hyperkalaemia (p-K+ \> 6 mmol/l) * Severe metabolic acidosis attributable to AKI (pH \< 7.25 and standard base excess \< -10 mmol/l) resistant to IV bicarbonate infusion * Severe respiratory failure with PaO2/FiO2 \< 13 kPa and bilateral infiltrates/oedema on the chest x-ray. * Progressive azotaemia and a blood urea nitrogen (BUN) \> 25 mmol/l.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years of age
- Acute Kidney Injury defined according to the KDIGO criteria
- Renal Recovery Score ≤ 60%. (Calculated using www.renal-recovery-score.com)
- Fluid overload defined as a positive fluid balance ≥ 10% of ideal body weight.
You may not qualify if:
- Known pre-hospitalization advanced chronic kidney disease. (eGFR \< 30 mL/minute/1.73 m2 or chronic RRT.)
- Severe hypoxic respiratory failure (use of invasive ventilation and FiO2 \> 80% and PEEP \> 10 cm H2O)
- Severe burn injury (≥ 10% TBSA)
- Severe hypo- or hyper- natremia (\< 120 or \> 155 mmol/l)
- Hepatic coma
- Mentally disabled undergoing forced treatment
- Pregnancy/breast feeding
- Lack of commitment for on-going life support including RRT
- Lack of informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Nordsjaellands Hospitallead
- Rigshospitalet, Denmarkcollaborator
- Aalborg University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Aalborg Universitetshospital, Anæstesi og intensiv afdeling
Aalborg, 9000, Denmark
Nordsjællands Hospital. Dept. of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care.
Hillerød, 3400, Denmark
Rigshospitale. ITA 4131 / Dept. of intensive care
København Ø, 2100, Denmark
Related Publications (2)
Berthelsen RE, Perner A, Jensen AK, Rasmussen BS, Jensen JU, Wiis J, Behzadi MT, Bestle MH. Forced fluid removal in intensive care patients with acute kidney injury: The randomised FFAKI feasibility trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Aug;62(7):936-944. doi: 10.1111/aas.13124. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
PMID: 29664109DERIVEDBerthelsen RE, Itenov T, Perner A, Jensen JU, Ibsen M, Jensen AEK, Bestle M. Forced fluid removal versus usual care in intensive care patients with high-risk acute kidney injury and severe fluid overload (FFAKI): study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot trial. Trials. 2017 Apr 24;18(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1935-2.
PMID: 28438182DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Morten H Bestle, MD, Ph D
Nordsjællands Hospital. Dept. of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care.
- STUDY CHAIR
Anders Perner, Md, Ph D
Rigshospitalet. ITA 4131 / Dept of Intensive Care
- STUDY CHAIR
Jens-Ulrik Jensen, MD, Ph D
Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen CHIP, Department of Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology, Section 2100
- STUDY CHAIR
Michael Ibsen, MD, Ph D
Nordsjællands Hospital. Dept. of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care.
- STUDY CHAIR
Rasmus E Berthelsen, MD
Nordsjællands Hospital. Dept. of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 21, 2015
First Posted
June 1, 2015
Study Start
October 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 8, 2017
Study Completion
June 8, 2017
Last Updated
July 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07