Application of Intra-operative Prophylactic Antibiotics/Antiseptics in Chinese Breast Reconstruction Patients
A Single Center Prospective Randomized Control Trial Investigating the Short-term and Long-term Effects of Intraoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics/Antiseptics on Surgical Outcomes in Chinese Post-mastectomy Breast Reconstruction Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
291
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study aims to investigate different approaches of local application of antibiotics/antiseptics intraoperatively in Chinese patients undergoing post-mastectomy implant based breast reconstruction, and aims to single out an intervention method that limits the use of antibiotics and maintains low rates of surgical site infection and capsular contracture. Patients who undergo post mastectomy breast reconstruction in the breast reconstruction department in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital are eligible to enter the study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 16, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 7, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2021
CompletedNovember 15, 2018
November 1, 2018
3.4 years
November 7, 2018
November 14, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Occurrence of minor surgical site infection
the reconstructed breasts present with redness, edema, pain and rise in skin temperature by observation, drainage or wound secretion microbiology culture are positive, the symptoms are relieved by oral antibiotics.
assessed up to 3 months post-op
Occurrence of major surgical site infection
the reconstructed breasts present with redness, edema, pain and rise in skin temperature by observation, drainage or wound secretion microbiology culture are positive, the symptoms are relieved by intravenous antibiotics or demand surgical interventions such as explantation or change of implant.
assessed up to 3 months post-op
Occurrence of capsular contracture
Hardness, pain, and or changes of shape/volume of the reconstructed breasts both by observation or inspected by breast imaging .The grade of capsular contracture is recorded in baker's grading(I-IV).
assessed from 3 months post-op up to 2 years post-op or until the trial ends, whichever comes first
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Occurrence of flap necrosis
assessed up to 1 months post-op
Occurrence of hematoma
assessed up to 72 hours post-op
Occurrence of peri-prosthetic seroma
from 3 months post-op up to 2 years post-op or until the trial ends
Baseline and changes of patient's evaluation
evaluate at 6 months as baseline, repeated evaluation at 12 months and 24 months post-op or until the trial ends, whichever comes first, to record changes
Study Arms (3)
saline control
NO INTERVENTIONImplant immersion with 100 ml sterile saline (0.9%) for 10 minutes; Breast pocket irrigation (IRRI) with 100ml type III Anerdian for 30 seconds and washed with a total of 1000ml sterile distilled water twice afterwards. No antibiotics is used.
Cefazolin/clindamycin immersion
EXPERIMENTALImplant immersion: implant is immersed with 200mg cefazolin in 100 ml sterile saline (0.9%) for 10 minutes, if the patient is allergic to cefazolin, 600mg clindamycin in 100ml sterile saline (0.9%) is used instead for immersion; Breast pocket irrigation (IRRI) with100ml type III Anerdian for 30 seconds and washed with a total of 1000ml sterile distilled water twice afterwards
Cefazolin/clindamycin immersion+ IRRI
EXPERIMENTALImplant immersion: implant is immersed with 200mg cefazolin in 100 ml sterile saline (0.9%) for 10 minutes, if the patient is allergic to cefazolin, 600mg clindamycin in 100ml sterile saline (0.9%) is used instead for immersion; Breast pocket irrigation (IRRI): breast pocket is irrigated with100ml type III Anerdian plus 200mg cefazolin in 100 ml sterile saline (0.9%) for 30 seconds and washed with a total of 1000ml sterile distilled water twice afterwards, if the patient is allergic to cefazolin, 600mg clindamycin in 100ml sterile saline (0.9%) is used instead of cefazolin
Interventions
Local implant immersion and/or breast pocket irrigation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who underwent mastectomy and eligible for implant-based breast reconstructions
- Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) larger than 70
- No severe deficiency in hematological, cardiovascular system, no immunodeficiency, no severe abnormal liver or kidney function
You may not qualify if:
- Metastatic breast cancer
- Local or systemic infection within 30 days prior to breast reconstruction surgery
- Local, oral or systemic administration of any form of antibiotics within 30 days prior to breast reconstruction surgery
- Pre-operative complete blood count shows white blood cell (WBC) count \>10\*10\^9/L, Neutrophil cell (N) count \> 7.5\*10\^9/L or N%\>80%
- Pre-operative blood procalcitonin (PCT) higher than upper limit of the normal range
- Past history with injection breast augmentation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, 300060, China
Related Publications (12)
Kummerow KL, Du L, Penson DF, Shyr Y, Hooks MA. Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg. 2015 Jan;150(1):9-16. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2895.
PMID: 25408966BACKGROUNDPiper ML, Roussel LO, Koltz PF, Wang F, Singh K, Chin R, Sbitany H, Langstein HN. Characterizing infections in prosthetic breast reconstruction: A validity assessment of national health databases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Oct;70(10):1345-1353. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 18.
PMID: 28619483BACKGROUNDConstantine RS, Constantine FC, Rohrich RJ. The ever-changing role of biofilms in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jun;133(6):865e-872e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000213.
PMID: 24867746BACKGROUNDRubino C, Brongo S, Pagliara D, Cuomo R, Abbinante G, Campitiello N, Santanelli F, Chessa D. Infections in breast implants: a review with a focus on developing countries. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2014 Sep 12;8(9):1089-95. doi: 10.3855/jidc.3898.
PMID: 25212072BACKGROUNDReish RG, Damjanovic B, Austen WG Jr, Winograd J, Liao EC, Cetrulo CL, Balkin DM, Colwell AS. Infection following implant-based reconstruction in 1952 consecutive breast reconstructions: salvage rates and predictors of success. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jun;131(6):1223-1230. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31828bd377.
PMID: 23714788BACKGROUNDAlderman A, Gutowski K, Ahuja A, Gray D; Postmastectomy ExpanderImplant Breast Reconstruction Guideline Work Group. ASPS clinical practice guideline summary on breast reconstruction with expanders and implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Oct;134(4):648e-655e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000541.
PMID: 25357060BACKGROUNDBarr SP, Topps AR, Barnes NL, Henderson J, Hignett S, Teasdale RL, McKenna A, Harvey JR, Kirwan CC; Northwest Breast Surgical Research Collaborative. Infection prevention in breast implant surgery - A review of the surgical evidence, guidelines and a checklist. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 May;42(5):591-603. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.02.240. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
PMID: 27005885BACKGROUNDPhillips BT, Fourman MS, Bishawi M, Zegers M, O'Hea BJ, Ganz JC, Huston TL, Dagum AB, Khan SU, Bui DT. Are Prophylactic Postoperative Antibiotics Necessary for Immediate Breast Reconstruction? Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jun;222(6):1116-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.02.018. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
PMID: 27106640BACKGROUNDPhillips BT, Halvorson EG. Antibiotic Prophylaxis following Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: What Is the Evidence? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Oct;138(4):751-757. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002530.
PMID: 27307337BACKGROUNDHuang N, Liu M, Yu P, Wu J. Antibiotic prophylaxis in prosthesis-based mammoplasty: a systematic review. Int J Surg. 2015 Mar;15:31-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.01.020. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
PMID: 25638736BACKGROUNDGowda AU, Chopra K, Brown EN, Slezak S, Rasko Y. Preventing Breast Implant Contamination in Breast Reconstruction: A National Survey of Current Practice. Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Feb;78(2):153-156. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000822.
PMID: 27464530BACKGROUNDFrois AO, Harbour PO, Azimi F, Young J, Chan B, Mak C, Warrier S. The Role of Antibiotics in Breast Pocket Irrigation and Implant Immersion: A Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Sep 14;6(9):e1868. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001868. eCollection 2018 Sep.
PMID: 30349776BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jian Yin
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Treatment allocation is revealed to the surgical team intraoperatively. Treatment allocation is revealed to the patient post-op in their first followup visit in the clinics.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 7, 2018
First Posted
November 15, 2018
Study Start
June 16, 2018
Primary Completion
October 31, 2021
Study Completion
October 31, 2021
Last Updated
November 15, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers