Feasibility of Serratus Plane Block Associated With Sedation in Axillary Dissection
Assessment of the Feasibility of Ultrasound Guided Serratus Plane Block Associated With Sedation as Anesthetic Technique in Axillary Dissection
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
INTRODUCTION: The axillary lymphadenectomy procedure is known to be associated with late postoperative complications, such as chronic pain and changes in shoulder mobility. Recently, several thoracic ultrasound guided interfascial blocks have been described, including serratus plane block. These blocks were associated with reduced postoperative pain scores in breast surgeries but were never evaluated in axillary dissection. The safety and feasibility of performing axillary dissection under local anesthesia and tumescent anesthesia associated with sedation has been demonstrated in case series, although it is not already the standard technique. DISCUSSION: This project aims to investigate the feasibility of the serratus plane block associated with intra-venous sedation in a prospective case series including 15 patients submitted to axillary dissection, by scoring patient and surgeon satisfaction with the technique, pain, quality of life with EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, and quality of recovery with QoR-40 questionnaire in the first 30 postoperative days.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 25, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 25, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 14, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 2, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 2, 2021
CompletedApril 8, 2022
August 1, 2021
2.4 years
June 25, 2018
March 30, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of patients who needed conversion to general anesthesia
Percentage of patients who needed conversion to general anesthesia. A percentage from 0 to 100%, where 0% means that no patient needs technique conversion to general anesthesia and 100% means that all patients need it.
Intraoperative
Secondary Outcomes (7)
The 30-item European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire.
Preoperative and in Postoperative day 30
QoR-40 questionnaire
Preoperative, First postoperative day visit and in Postoperative day 30
Surgeon satisfaction - 5 points Likert scale
Imediate postoperative period
Patient satisfaction - 5 points Likert scale
First postoperative day visit
Numeric pain rating scale (0-10)
Preoperative, postoperative day 1 and 30
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Serratus plane block plus sedation
EXPERIMENTALSerratus plane block plus intravenous sedation as anesthetic technique during axillary dissection procedure.
Interventions
Ultrasound guided injection of local anesthetic between latissimus dorsi and serratus muscles at mid axillary line.
Axillary dissection is a surgical procedure that incises the axilla to identify, examine, or remove lymph nodes.
Administration of sedatives thru an intravenous access to achieve relaxion and improve operative conditions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Undergo axillary dissection due to metastatic skin or soft tissue cancer;
- ASA physical status classification between I and III;
- have signed the informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- weight less than 40 kilograms;
- tumor affecting topography to be blocked;
- presence of ulcerated lesion in the axilla;
- presence of coagulopathy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital do Câncer II - National Cancer Institute of Brazil (INCA - Brazil)
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro/RJ, 20220-410, Brazil
Related Publications (18)
Fecho K, Miller NR, Merritt SA, Klauber-Demore N, Hultman CS, Blau WS. Acute and persistent postoperative pain after breast surgery. Pain Med. 2009 May-Jun;10(4):708-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00611.x. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
PMID: 19453965BACKGROUNDAndersen KG, Kehlet H. Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment: a critical review of risk factors and strategies for prevention. J Pain. 2011 Jul;12(7):725-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.12.005. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
PMID: 21435953BACKGROUNDStoffels I, Dissemond J, Korber A, Hillen U, Poeppel T, Schadendorf D, Klode J. Reliability and cost-effectiveness of sentinel lymph node excision under local anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia for malignant melanoma: a retrospective analysis in 300 patients with malignant melanoma AJCC Stages I and II. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011 Mar;25(3):306-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03786.x.
PMID: 20626530BACKGROUNDStoffels I, Dissemond J, Schulz A, Hillen U, Schadendorf D, Klode J. Reliability and cost-effectiveness of complete lymph node dissection under tumescent local anaesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a retrospective analysis in patients with malignant melanoma AJCC stage III. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012 Feb;26(2):200-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04036.x. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
PMID: 21414036BACKGROUNDPawa A, Wight J, Onwochei DN, Vargulescu R, Reed I, Chrisman L, Pushpanathan E, Kothari A, El-Boghdadly K. Combined thoracic paravertebral and pectoral nerve blocks for breast surgery under sedation: a prospective observational case series. Anaesthesia. 2018 Apr;73(4):438-443. doi: 10.1111/anae.14213. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
PMID: 29327341BACKGROUNDWoodworth GE, Ivie RMJ, Nelson SM, Walker CM, Maniker RB. Perioperative Breast Analgesia: A Qualitative Review of Anatomy and Regional Techniques. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Sep/Oct;42(5):609-631. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000641.
PMID: 28820803BACKGROUNDKwekkeboom K. Postmastectomy pain syndromes. Cancer Nurs. 1996 Feb;19(1):37-43. doi: 10.1097/00002820-199602000-00005.
PMID: 8904385BACKGROUNDVecht CJ, Van de Brand HJ, Wajer OJ. Post-axillary dissection pain in breast cancer due to a lesion of the intercostobrachial nerve. Pain. 1989 Aug;38(2):171-6. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90235-2.
PMID: 2780072BACKGROUNDBlanco R, Fajardo M, Parras Maldonado T. Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): a novel approach to breast surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Nov;59(9):470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
PMID: 22939099BACKGROUNDSchnabel A, Reichl SU, Kranke P, Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Zahn PK. Efficacy and safety of paravertebral blocks in breast surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Dec;105(6):842-52. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq265. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
PMID: 20947592BACKGROUNDBlanco R, Parras T, McDonnell JG, Prats-Galino A. Serratus plane block: a novel ultrasound-guided thoracic wall nerve block. Anaesthesia. 2013 Nov;68(11):1107-13. doi: 10.1111/anae.12344. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
PMID: 23923989BACKGROUNDLee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, Thomas EJ, Polanczyk CA, Cook EF, Sugarbaker DJ, Donaldson MC, Poss R, Ho KK, Ludwig LE, Pedan A, Goldman L. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999 Sep 7;100(10):1043-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.10.1043.
PMID: 10477528BACKGROUNDJette M, Sidney K, Blumchen G. Metabolic equivalents (METS) in exercise testing, exercise prescription, and evaluation of functional capacity. Clin Cardiol. 1990 Aug;13(8):555-65. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960130809.
PMID: 2204507BACKGROUNDOken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55. No abstract available.
PMID: 7165009BACKGROUNDMyles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.
PMID: 10740540BACKGROUNDAaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
PMID: 8433390BACKGROUNDFranceschini J, Jardim JR, Fernandes AL, Jamnik S, Santoro IL. Reproducibility of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire used in conjunction with its lung cancer-specific module. J Bras Pneumol. 2010 Sep-Oct;36(5):595-602. doi: 10.1590/s1806-37132010000500011. English, Portuguese.
PMID: 21085825BACKGROUNDAgha RA, Fowler AJ, Rajmohan S, Barai I, Orgill DP; PROCESS Group. Preferred reporting of case series in surgery; the PROCESS guidelines. Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt A):319-323. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.025. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
PMID: 27770639BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniele Theobald, MD
National Cancer Institute of Brazil (INCA - Brazil)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 25, 2018
First Posted
November 14, 2018
Study Start
September 25, 2018
Primary Completion
March 2, 2021
Study Completion
March 2, 2021
Last Updated
April 8, 2022
Record last verified: 2021-08