The Effects of Flow Settings During High Flow Nasal Cannula for Adult Hypoxemia Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
49
1 country
1
Brief Summary
High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) delivers oxygen at a flow which exceeds the patient's inspiratory flow demand in order to improve oxygenation. Numerous randomized control trials and meta-analyses have shown that HFNC improves oxygenation and helps avoid intubation in hypoxemic patients, as well as reduce work of breathing, improve ventilation, and decrease hypercapnia in COPD patients. Flow settings play a critical role when using HFNC, as increased flow can reduce inspiratory effort, improve ventilation, and dynamic lung compliance. However, flow rates used in many studies vary widely. The clinical effects of different HFNC flow setting, specifically to match or over than a patients' own inspiratory flow, is still unknown.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 8, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 13, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 26, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2021
CompletedApril 23, 2021
April 1, 2021
2.3 years
November 8, 2018
April 21, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
SpO2/FIO2 increment for hypoxemic patients
SpO2/FIO2 at the optimal/maximum /tolerable/ HFNC flow setting compared to the SpO2/FIO2 at HFNC flow matching patient's inspiratory flow or 30 L/min for hypoxemic patients
30 minutes
RR change for hypoxemic patients
Respiratory rates at the optimal/maximum /tolerable/ HFNC flow setting compared to the SpO2/FIO2 at HFNC flow matching patient's inspiratory flow or 30 L/min for hypoxemic patients
30 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
comfort scores
30 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Oxygenation on hypoxemia patients
EXPERIMENTALAdult patients with hypoxemia will be recruited, their own breathing profiles (inspiratory flow, respiratory rates and tidal volume) will be measured. Then patients will be placed on high flow nasal cannula (HFNC), HFNC flow will be titrated based on the hospital's policy or protocol and patient's comfort, patient's clinical effects on oxygenation will be monitored and recorded during the titration process.
Lung expansion on healthy volunteer
EXPERIMENTALAdult healthy volunteers will be recruited, their own breathing profiles (inspiratory flow, respiratory rates and tidal volume) will be measured. Then they will be placed on HFNC, HFNC flow will be increased sequentially by research protocol and their comfort, subjects' lung expansion effects in different flow will be quantified by Electrical impedance tomography (EIT), a noninvasive assessment tool. Their comfort will also be assessed using a visual scale.
Interventions
HFNC flow will be titrated based on the hospital's policy or protocol for hypoxemic patients and research protocol for healthy volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients (Age \> 18yrs and \< 90yrs) who need nasal cannula oxygen flow ≥ 5 L/min to maintain SpO2 at 90-97%.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to verbally communicate;
- Pregnant
- Inability to breathe via nose, such as nasosinusitis, stuffy nose or nasal obstruction, etc.
- Ordered SpO2 goal is above 97%
- FIO2 needs ≤ 0.4
- Using inhaled pulmonary vasodilator via HFNC
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Related Publications (6)
Ni YN, Luo J, Yu H, Liu D, Ni Z, Cheng J, Liang BM, Liang ZA. Can High-flow Nasal Cannula Reduce the Rate of Endotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure Compared With Conventional Oxygen Therapy and Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation?: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Chest. 2017 Apr;151(4):764-775. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
PMID: 28089816RESULTPisani L, Fasano L, Corcione N, Comellini V, Musti MA, Brandao M, Bottone D, Calderini E, Navalesi P, Nava S. Change in pulmonary mechanics and the effect on breathing pattern of high flow oxygen therapy in stable hypercapnic COPD. Thorax. 2017 Apr;72(4):373-375. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209673. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
PMID: 28104830RESULTMauri T, Alban L, Turrini C, Cambiaghi B, Carlesso E, Taccone P, Bottino N, Lissoni A, Spadaro S, Volta CA, Gattinoni L, Pesenti A, Grasselli G. Optimum support by high-flow nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: effects of increasing flow rates. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Oct;43(10):1453-1463. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4890-1. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
PMID: 28762180RESULTMauri T, Turrini C, Eronia N, Grasselli G, Volta CA, Bellani G, Pesenti A. Physiologic Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 May 1;195(9):1207-1215. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201605-0916OC.
PMID: 27997805RESULTDelorme M, Bouchard PA, Simon M, Simard S, Lellouche F. Effects of High-Flow Nasal Cannula on the Work of Breathing in Patients Recovering From Acute Respiratory Failure. Crit Care Med. 2017 Dec;45(12):1981-1988. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002693.
PMID: 28857852RESULTLi J, Scott JB, Fink JB, Reed B, Roca O, Dhand R. Optimizing high-flow nasal cannula flow settings in adult hypoxemic patients based on peak inspiratory flow during tidal breathing. Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Nov 27;11(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00949-8.
PMID: 34837553DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jie Li, PhD
Rush University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- The participant will be masked by the flow setting
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 8, 2018
First Posted
November 13, 2018
Study Start
December 26, 2018
Primary Completion
March 30, 2021
Study Completion
March 30, 2021
Last Updated
April 23, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- 5 years following publication
- Access Criteria
- contacting the corresponding author with clear description on the use of the data
Individual participant data after deidentification that underlie the reports reported in this article can be obtained by contacting the corresponding author. Data will be available immediately following publication and ending in 5 years.