The Effectiveness of Manual Therapy and PNF Compared With Kinesiotherapy in the Treatment of Non-specific Low Back Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study was to determine whether the use of combination therapy consisting of manual therapy and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) is more effective than the use of the techniques of manual therapy, PNF method or traditional physiotherapy as single methods in the treatment of non-specific low back pain. The study was designed as single-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) and conducted on a group of 200 patients of Hospital in Parczew. The patients were randomly divided into four 50-person groups: A used manual therapy, B - PNF, C - manual therapy and PNF, and D -kinesiotherapy. Pain intensity was measured using VAS and Laitinen's questionnaire. Functional disability was assessed using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Back Pain Functional Scale (BPFS). . The hypotheses were:
- 1.The greatest reduction of pain is observed in the combined therapy group consisting of manual therapy and PNF method
- 2.The range of movement of the lumbar spine is the most improved in the combination therapy group consisting of manual therapy and PNF method.
- 3.Neurological symptoms assessed by neurodynamic tests are reduced to the greatest extent in the combined therapy group consisting of manual therapy and PNF method.
- 4.The degree of disability due to back pain as assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) decreases in all study groups.
- 5.The functioning of patients in everyday life assessed using Back Pain Functional Scale (BPFS) shows the biggest improvement in the combination therapy group consisting of manual therapy and PNF method.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 8, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 7, 2018
CompletedNovember 7, 2018
November 1, 2018
2.2 years
October 8, 2018
November 5, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual analogue scale of pain (VAS)
Visual analogue scale of pain (VAS) evaluates intensity of pain in a scale of 0 to 10. Maximum score meaning the highest level of pain.
visual analogue pain scale (VAS) was carried out four times (before the start of the therapy, after 5 days of therapy, immediately after its completion and two weeks after the end of the treatment).
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Modified Laitinen's pain questionnaire
A modified Laitinen's pain questionnaire was carried out four times (before the start of the therapy, after 5 days of therapy, immediately after its completion and two weeks after the end of the treatment).
Stratford's back pain functional scale (BPFS)
Stratford's back pain functional scale (BPFS) was done twice - before and immediately after the treatment.
Goniometric examination of active movements in the thoracic-lumbar spine
Goniometric examination of active movements in the thoracic-lumbar spine were done twice - before and immediately after the treatment.
Study Arms (4)
Manual therapy
EXPERIMENTALA group of 50 people using manual therapy as a treatment method.
PNF
EXPERIMENTALA group of 50 people using PNF (Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation) as a treatment method.
Manual therapy + PNF
EXPERIMENTALA group of 50 people using combination therapy - manual therapy and PNF.
Kinesiotherapy
EXPERIMENTALA group of 50 people using traditional kinesiotherapy (exercises) as a treatment method.
Interventions
Manual therapy - the mobilisation of joint segments L4-L5 and L5-S1 and mobilisation techniques for soft tissues (functional massage of soft tissues and skin relaxation using the methods of stretching).
The PNF method - the movement patterns of the scapulae and the pelvis were used (anterior and posterior elevations and depression) along with the patterns of upper extremities (e.g. bending, abduction, outward rotation) and lower extremities (e.g. bending, abduction, inward rotation with bending of the knee joint).
Combination therapy - Manual therapy and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation
Traditional kinesiotherapy in the form of active slow exercises of back muscles, abdominal and gluteal muscles on a mat. The patients participated in a uniform treatment programme consisting of ten exercises. Each of the exercises was performed in a number of 20 repetitions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- the patients' age between 25 and 55,
- symptomatic spinal disc herniation of the lumbar spine at levels L4-L5 and/or L5-S1,
- confirmed by imaging examinations (MR, TK),
- the patients' lack of use of non-steroid anti-inflammatory medications (NSAID) for a period of at least one week before the start of the tests.
You may not qualify if:
- people with cancer,
- past spinal injuries with damage to anatomical structures and osteoporosis,
- patients with a severe inflammatory condition (sciatica) and a massive hernia of the intervertebral disc which required surgical treatment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Public Hospital
Parczew, Lubleskie, 21-200, Poland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Kamil Zaworski
MU Lublin
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- None of the physicians were personally involved in the preparation and the manner of performing the test. Before commencing the tests, each patient was familiarised with their course, expressed their informed written consent for participation and random assignment to a specified tested group. The author of this paper had no influence on the categorisation of patients into individual treatment groups. During the studies, the physicians performing the categorisation were not informed about the results of the used treatment. However, on request they could acquire information about the result of using the procedures for a single patient. They were also informed about the occurrence of any undesired events.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 8, 2018
First Posted
November 7, 2018
Study Start
March 1, 2014
Primary Completion
April 30, 2016
Study Completion
April 30, 2016
Last Updated
November 7, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-11