Study Stopped
based on interim anaylsis
Epidural Clonidine Versus Corticosteroid for Low Back Pain
Prospective, Randomized, Double Blinded Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Epidural Clonidine Versus Corticosteroid for Low Back Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
16
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Low back pain is a common condition, affecting majority of the adults in the United States at some point in their lives. Fortunately, most resolve, even without treatment. However, some suffer from continued or recurrent pain. For those suffering from continued or recurrent low back pain, numerous treatment options exist. One such option is an epidural injection, particularly when other non-surgical treatment options have failed. An epidural injection is the placement of a needle into the space around the spinal cord with the aid of a live X-Ray machine, followed by an injection of various medications. Typically, the medication that is injected is a steroid, commonly with the combination of local anesthetic medication. Epidural steroid injections, with or without local anesthetic is part of the established standard of care in the United States for those with continued or recurrent low back pain. The steroid is believed to reduce inflammation and edema of the injured or irritated nerves. However, despite the routine use of epidural steroids, the steroid itself is not without risks or side effects. Though rare, the steroids have been associated with complications including osteoporosis, steroid induced myopathy, cataracts and many others. In order to minimize the side effects associated with epidural steroids, limiting the dose and frequency have been outlined. Clonidine is another medication, commonly used in numerous clinical settings. U. S. Food and Drug Administration approved the medication for epidural use for cancer pain but studies have shown effectiveness in non-cancer pain was well and is routinely used for various conditions. There is growing evidence on the use of epidural clonidine for treatment of pain, including low back pain. This research will study and compare the effectiveness, if any, of clonidine compared to steroid in an epidural injection for low back pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 10, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 20, 2021
CompletedJanuary 20, 2021
December 1, 2020
9 months
September 10, 2014
December 22, 2020
December 22, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Intensity Measured on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Percentage of Pain Relief
Day 0, 3 weeks, 3 months
Level of Disability (Oswestry Back Scale)
3 weeks, 3 months
Adverse Events
Day 0, 3 weeks, 3 months
Study Arms (2)
Steroid
ACTIVE COMPARATOREpidural steroid injection
Clonidine
EXPERIMENTALEpidural clonidine injection
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject has clinical diagnosis of low back due to intervertebral disc disease, spinal stenosis or herniated disc
- Subject has average pain score (VAS) at least 5
- Subject has persistent pain despite conservative care
- Subjects has experienced pain for at least 1 month
- years of age or older when written informed consent is obtained
- Signed Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to clonidine, dexamethasone, ropivicaine or lidocaine
- Coagulopathy
- Active Infection
- Serious neurologic deficit
- Subject is pregnant or planning on becoming pregnant during the course of the study
- Subject is member of a vulnerable population
- Investigator suspects substance abuse that might confound the study results
- Subject has unresolved major issues of secondary gain (as determined by the investigator)
- Subject exhibits major psychiatric morbidity, untreated or refractory to treatment as determined by the investigator
- Currently diagnosed with cognitive impairment, or exhibits any characteristic, that would limit study candidate's ability to assess pain relief or complete study assessments
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
West Virginia University Hospitals
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26505, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Trials Compliance Coordinator
- Organization
- West Virginia Universtiy, WVCTSI
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 10, 2014
First Posted
September 15, 2014
Study Start
September 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
June 1, 2015
Last Updated
January 20, 2021
Results First Posted
January 20, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-12