Using Intranasal Midazolam (INM) and Lidocaine for Uncooperative Children
INM
The Effectiveness of Topical Lidocaine in Relieving Pain Related To Intranasal Midazolam Sedation: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
63
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aims: The objective of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness of topical lidocaine in relieving pain related to INM administration. Design: This was a blinded, randomized placebo-controlled trial. Sixty-three uncooperative children, aged 4 - 11.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jun 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 10, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 21, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 31, 2018
CompletedNovember 5, 2018
November 1, 2018
7 months
October 21, 2018
November 2, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in Pain Scores on the Wong Baker Faces Scale for pain assessment when administering midazolam alone, saline or midazolam premidicated with lidocaine .
The use of intranasal midazolam is associated with a burning sensation of the nasal mucosa, the pain was assessed using a self report pain scale Wong Baker Faces Scale, the degree of pain is determined by choosing a score of (0-2-4-6-8-10) (minimum score 0, means no pain, maximum score 10, means the drug hurts worst, higher scores are worse) the scores were reported by children received intranasal midazolam alone, intranasal midazolam preceded by intranasal lidocaine or intranasal saline (placebo).
one to five minutes following the administration.
Study Arms (3)
A (Midazolam)
ACTIVE COMPARATOR21 children received 0.5 mg/kg intranasal medication (midazolam), with a maximum dose of 10 mg, via a spray of 0.2 ml per puff, administering the drug was alternated between the two nostrils of the child.
B (Lidocaine-Midazolam)
EXPERIMENTAL21 children received a puff of lidocaine 2% in each nostril, after 60 seconds, they received 0.5 mg/kg intranasal medication (midazolam),administering the drug was alternated between the two nostrils of the child, with a maximum dose of 10 mg via a spray of 0.2 ml per puff.
C (Placebo)
PLACEBO COMPARATOR21 children received intranasal medication (saline 9% as placebo), 0.5 mg/kg, with a maximum dose of 10 mg via a spray of 0.2 ml per puff,administering the drug was alternated between the two nostrils of the child.
Interventions
Patients received 0.5 mg/kg midazolam, with a maximum dose of 10 mg, Immediately following the administration, the child was asked to record the score of pain on the self reporting pain scale, WBFS.
Patients received a puff of lidocaine 2% in each nostril, after 60 seconds, they received 0.5 mg/kg midazolam, with a maximum dose of 10 mg. , Immediately following the administration, the child was asked to record the score of pain on the self reporting pain scale, WBFS.
Patients received saline 9% (placebo), 0.5 mg/kg, with a maximum dose of 10 mg, Immediately following the administration, the child was asked to record the score of pain on the self reporting pain scale, WBFS.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- uncooperative children scored 1 or 2 on Frankle Scale.
- had no medical history of neurological or cognitive alterations.
- No facial deformities.
- ASA Classification I.
- requiring dental treatment under local anesthesia.
You may not qualify if:
- known allergy to midazolam or any other benzodiazepines.
- upper respiratory tract infection with nasal discharge.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tishreen University
Latakia, Syria
Related Publications (1)
Smith D, Cheek H, Denson B, Pruitt CM. Lidocaine Pretreatment Reduces the Discomfort of Intranasal Midazolam Administration: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Feb;24(2):161-167. doi: 10.1111/acem.13115. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
PMID: 27739142RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Nabih Raslan, Dr.
Tishreen University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Walaa Khalil, Dr.
Tishreen University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The participant was blinded, the first assistant who explained the pain scale to the participants and asked him\\her to record the score of pain associated with the drug administration was also blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2018
First Posted
October 31, 2018
Study Start
June 1, 2017
Primary Completion
January 1, 2018
Study Completion
October 10, 2018
Last Updated
November 5, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-11