PREMIX vs PREMED Intranasal Lidocaine and Midazolam
Comparison of Two Methods Using Intranasal Lidocaine to Alleviate Discomfort Associated With Administration of Intranasal Midazolam in Children.
1 other identifier
interventional
55
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Intranasal (IN) midazolam is an anxiolytic that is commonly used in the pediatric population for procedural anxiolysis in the emergency department (ED) setting to facilitate painful and distressing procedures, such as laceration repairs. Intranasal midazolam is both effective and safe in children. However, due to the acidic nature of midazolam, there is a burning sensation that is associated with the intranasal administration of midazolam. The use of IN lidocaine has been shown to decrease the pain associated with the administration of IN midazolam and other acidic solutions. The IN lidocaine can be given as a premedication (PREMED), where it is sprayed in the nares first to provide topical anesthesia, and then followed by the administration of the IN midazolam. Lidocaine can also be given concurrently with the IN midazolam (PREMIX), where it is mixed with the midazolam and then the combined mixture administered. Both methods have been shown to be effective in decreasing the pain associated with the intranasal administration of acidic solutions, such as midazolam, although the PREMIX method could have the advantage of requiring less number of sprays, and be tolerated better by children. Although both methods have been shown to work, it is not known if the PREMIX method is non-inferior to the PREMED method for decreasing pain and distress associated with administering IN midazolam. Therefore, the investigators aim to determine if the PREMIX method is non-inferior to the PREMED method of using lidocaine to decrease the pain and distress associated with the administration of IN midazolam in children.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2 pain
Started Apr 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_2 pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 16, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 3, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 10, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 10, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 11, 2019
CompletedSeptember 11, 2019
August 1, 2019
6 months
February 13, 2017
March 9, 2019
August 19, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Procedural Distress, OSBD-R
The Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress-Revised (OSBD-R) is an observational measure of pain and distress shown to have strong validity in children. The scale is an 8-factor, weighted observational scale used to measure distress associated with medical procedures, which has been validated in children and adults aged 1 to 20 years. The total Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress-Revised score is the sum of the scale scores for each phase, with each phase assigned a score from 0 to 23.5 units on a scale (0=no distress, 23.5=maximum distress), based on the frequency and types of behaviors observed during a predetermined number of 15-second intervals during each phase. There were four phases so the range of scores for the total OSBD-R was 0 to 94 units on a scale, with a higher score indicated a greater degree of distress.
10 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Procedural Pain
10 minutes
Procedural Distress, FLACC
10 minutes
Procedural Distress, Cry Duration
10 minutes
Parental Satisfaction
1 minute
Provider Satisfaction
1 minute
Study Arms (2)
PREMED
EXPERIMENTALPatients will receive 0.25 mL of IN 4% lidocaine (10 mg) in each naris (total of 0.5 mL/20 mg for both nares) preceding adminstration of IN midazolam.
PREMIX
EXPERIMENTALPatients will receive midazolam mixed with 0.5 mL of 4% lidocaine (20 mg).
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Between the age of ≥ 6 months or ≤ 7 years old
- Undergoing a laceration repair
- Treating physician has determined that patient requires intranasal midazolam to facilitate the laceration repair
You may not qualify if:
- Weight \< 5 kg
- Known allergy to Lidocaine or Midazolam
- Does not speak English or Spanish
- Nasal injury precluding IN medication delivery
- Presence of intranasal obstruction (mucous/blood) not easily cleared with suction or nose blowing
- Baseline motor neurological abnormality (e.g. motor deficit, cerebral palsy)
- Developmental delay, autism, autism spectrum disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Related Publications (5)
Tsze DS, Steele DW, Machan JT, Akhlaghi F, Linakis JG. Intranasal ketamine for procedural sedation in pediatric laceration repair: a preliminary report. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Aug;28(8):767-70. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182624935.
PMID: 22858745BACKGROUNDTsze DS, Ieni M, Fenster DB, Babineau J, Kriger J, Levin B, Dayan PS. Optimal Volume of Administration of Intranasal Midazolam in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2017 May;69(5):600-609. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.08.450. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
PMID: 27823876BACKGROUNDFenster DB, Dayan PS, Babineau J, Aponte-Patel L, Tsze DS. Randomized Trial of Intranasal Fentanyl Versus Intravenous Morphine for Abscess Incision and Drainage. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018 Sep;34(9):607-612. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000810.
PMID: 27387971BACKGROUNDGodambe SA, Elliot V, Matheny D, Pershad J. Comparison of propofol/fentanyl versus ketamine/midazolam for brief orthopedic procedural sedation in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics. 2003 Jul;112(1 Pt 1):116-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.1.116.
PMID: 12837876BACKGROUNDLee-Jayaram JJ, Green A, Siembieda J, Gracely EJ, Mull CC, Quintana E, Adirim T. Ketamine/midazolam versus etomidate/fentanyl: procedural sedation for pediatric orthopedic reductions. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Jun;26(6):408-12. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181e057cd.
PMID: 20502386BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Daniel Tsze
- Organization
- Columbia University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel S Tsze, MD, MPH
Columbia University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Pediatrics at CUMC
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 13, 2017
First Posted
February 16, 2017
Study Start
April 3, 2017
Primary Completion
October 10, 2017
Study Completion
October 10, 2017
Last Updated
September 11, 2019
Results First Posted
September 11, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share