Treatment of Post Sphincterotomy-bleeding by Epinephrine-injection Versus Insertion of an Plastic Stent
Retrospective Study on Treatment of Post Sphincterotomy-bleeding by Epinephrine-injection Versus Insertion of an Endoprosthesis: a Single Center Experience Over 16 Years With 5698 ERCPs
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Post sphinterotomy-bleeding (PSB) occurs in 1-2 % of Endosocpic Retrograde Cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) and usually needs no blood transfusion after endoscopic therapy but can be life-threatening in some rare cases. There are no prospective comparative studies concerning the endoscopic treatment of PSB due to the rarity of the incident. Insertion of an endoprosthesis in the common bile duct may be more effective than Epinephrin-injection into the papilla which is the therapy of first choice. A retrospective single centre analysis on both used methods over a study period of 16 years shall be performed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2018
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 29, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 29, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 31, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 15, 2018
CompletedMarch 19, 2020
March 1, 2020
1 month
October 29, 2018
March 18, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Clinical success
No re-bleeding occurs in the follow-up that requirers a further interventional treatment of re-bleeding (any endoscopic, radiological embolization or surgery): yes/no
From the successful endocopic treatment of post sphincterotomy-bleeding up to 30 days in the follow up
Re-interventions
Amount of endoscopic re-interventions (further endoscopic therapy of re-bleeding of the papilla, removal or exchange of the plastic stent): number (n)
From the endoscopic treatment of post-sphincterotomy-bleeding up to three months
Hospital stay after treatment
Hospital stay (days) after treatment of post sphincterotomy-bleeding
From the endoscopic treatment of post-sphincterotomy-bleeding up to 30 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Post ERCP-pancreatitis
From the endoscopic treatment of post-sphincterotomy-bleeding up to three days
Increasing of cholestasis parameters
From treatment of post-sphincterotomy-bleeding up to three days
Study Arms (2)
Epinephrin injection
Diluted Epinephrin (1:100) in small amounts from 1 to 5 ml is injected into apex of the papilla to stop post sphincterotomy-bleeding
Plastic stent insertion
A plastic stent (diameter: 8-11,5F and length of 50 -100mm) is inserted into the common bile duct to stop post sphincterotomy-bleeding
Eligibility Criteria
All documented ERCPs in the single centre institution database are systematically screened for post sphincterotomy-bleeding in the time period from 1.1.2002 to 29.10.2018
You may qualify if:
- Post sphincterotomy bleeding (PSB) of the papilla (time frame: from procedure up to ten days after the procedure)
- Treatment of PSB by epinephrine-injection or insertion of a plastic stent into the common bile duct
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant and/or lactating women
- Complete patient record is not available
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tertiary referral hospital: Theresienkrankenhaus und St. Hedwig Hospital, Academic
Mannheim, 68165, Germany
Related Publications (4)
Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, Niro G, Valvano MR, Spirito F, Pilotto A, Forlano R. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug;102(8):1781-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x. Epub 2007 May 17.
PMID: 17509029BACKGROUNDFreeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, Moore JP, Fennerty MB, Ryan ME, Shaw MJ, Lande JD, Pheley AM. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med. 1996 Sep 26;335(13):909-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199609263351301.
PMID: 8782497BACKGROUNDCotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickl N. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 May-Jun;37(3):383-93. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70740-2.
PMID: 2070995BACKGROUNDMatsushita M, Hajiro K, Takakuwa H, Nishio A. Effective hemostatic injection above the bleeding site for uncontrolled bleeding after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Feb;51(2):221-3. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70425-1. No abstract available.
PMID: 10650275BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel Schmitz, Dr.med.
Theresienkrankenhaus und St.Hedwigsklinik GmbH, Bassermannstr.1, 68165 Mannheim
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant medical director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 29, 2018
First Posted
October 31, 2018
Study Start
October 29, 2018
Primary Completion
November 30, 2018
Study Completion
December 15, 2018
Last Updated
March 19, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share