Trial of Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation
A Double-blind, Cross-over Comparison of Closed Loop Versus Conventional Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus in the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
15
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Currently, treatment of Parkinson's Disease with deep brain stimulation (DBS) uses continuous high frequency stimulation. The investigators have previously shown that by controlling the stimulation using feedback from the brain and only delivering stimulation when needed side-effects like speech disturbance can be reduced. Here the investigators contrast conventional DBS with adaptive DBS while patients are awake and sleeping.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable parkinson-disease
Started Oct 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable parkinson-disease
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 26, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2020
CompletedApril 16, 2019
April 1, 2019
3 months
October 26, 2018
April 15, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Daytime Assessment
Average of blinded videoed United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score repeated every 3 hours through the day. Score range 0-108. Higher score is worse outcome.
1 day
Night time assessment
Average blinded videoed assessment scores of mobility during sleep arousals and awakenings. Score range 0-10. Higher score is worse outcome.
1 night
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Energy delivered
1 day/night cycle
Tremor severity
1 day/night cycle
Objective motor impairment
1 day
Speech impairment
1 day
Dyskinesia severity
1 day
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Adaptive DBS
EXPERIMENTALWe will use our custom-built externalized research system (ERS) to deliver adaptive stimulation to the subthalamic nuclei.
Conventional DBS
ACTIVE COMPARATORWe will use our custom-built externalized research system (ERS) to deliver continuous stimulation to the subthalamic nuclei.
Interventions
We will use our custom-built externalized research system (ERS) to allow recordings and stimulation. The device is small and lightweight and communicates wirelessly with a personal computer. The electrical connections to the DBS leads will be through temporary extensions with appropriate mechanical slack. To allow for stimulation return, a conductive clip to the ERS case will be connected to a conducting (ECG) pad placed over chest. Periodic impedance checks will ensure this connection is robust through the course of the experiment. The patient can be ambulant whilst wearing the device.
We will use our custom-built externalized research system (ERS) to deliver continuous conventional stimulation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Study participants will be patients undergoing DBS of the subthalamic nucleus for the treatment of severe Parkinson's disease. Severe Parkinson's disease is defined as marked motor fluctuations (off periods and dyskinesias) despite optimal medical management. This is determined by the patient's clinical team.
- Able to give consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Cognitive impairment (judged by the clinician taking consent as not having sufficient mental capacity to understand the study and its requirements). This includes anyone who, in the opinion of the clinician taking consent, is unlikely to retain sufficient mental capacity for the duration of their involvement in the study.
- Intracranial bleeding, confusion, cerebrospinal fluid leak or any other complication after the first stage of surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- St. George's Hospital, Londonlead
- University of Oxfordcollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Erlick Pereira, DM FRCS
St George's University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Patients will not be told which form of stimulation is being applied and the main measures used to evaluate the outcome of the study will be video-taped performance on a number of motor tasks and the video-taping of mobility during arousals and awakenings from sleep.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Lecturer in Neurosurgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 26, 2018
First Posted
October 30, 2018
Study Start
October 1, 2019
Primary Completion
January 1, 2020
Study Completion
May 1, 2020
Last Updated
April 16, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share