Impact of Psychoeducation in Quality of Life of Parents With Children With Congenital Heart Defects
Impact Assessment of a Psychoeducational Intervention in Quality of Life of Parents With Children With Congenital Heart Defects
2 other identifiers
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Congenital heart defects (CHD) are the most common congenital malformations. Despite the progress made in the last decades in diagnosis and treatment, CHD continues to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Several studies have shown a reduction in the quality of life (QoL) of parents of children with CHD, which may affect children too. The main research aim is to assess and to understand the impact of a psychoeducational intervention in QoL of parents with newborns with CHD. We are including parents of inpatient newborns in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of UAG da Mulher e Criança - Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João (CHUSJ) with the diagnosis of non-syndromic CHD, between March 2019 and February 2020. We also included parents of newborns born at CHUSJ with the diagnosis of non-syndromic CHD, not admited in NICU, between September 2019 and February 2020. The inclusion criteria are: I) parents of newborns (up to 28 days) with the diagnosis of non- syndromic CHD; II) newborns hospitalized in CHUSJ; III) parents aged ≥ 18 years. Parents of newborns with other important co-morbidities associated with CHD and those who do not have good understanding and expression in Portuguese will be excluded. Parents will be divided in 2 study groups: INTERVENTION group (I) and CONTROL group (C). Group I will receive a psychoeducational intervention in addition to the usual routines of the Service. Group C will receive the usual routines of the Service. The psychoeducational intervention, which consists of 2 sessions lasting 90 minutes each one, will be performed as soon as possible after inclusion in the study. Participants will be evaluated in three moments: M1 beginning of the study; M2 4 weeks after the intervention (I) or after enrollment (C) and M3 16 weeks after intervention/enrollment. The primary outcome will be parental QoL, which will be evaluated through the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Bref (WHOQOL-Bref). The family impact and the perception of positive contributions will be secondary outcomes. These outcome variables will be assessed by the Impact on Family Scale and the Positive Contributions Scale - Kansas Inventory of Parental Perceptions, respectively. A semi-structured interview will be performed after all quantitative data have been collected. The authors expect to find an increase of QoL and positive contributions and a decrease of family impact in the intervention group comparatively to the control group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 26, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 7, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2020
CompletedSeptember 16, 2021
July 1, 2021
12 months
October 26, 2018
September 8, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes on parental QoL
Changes on parental quality of life assessed through World Health Organization Quality of Life-Bref (WHOQOL-Bref). The WHOQOL-Bref instrument is composed by 26 items, which are organized in 4 specific domains: Physical (7 items), Psychological (6 items), Social Relationships (3 items), Environment (8 items) and a general QoL facet (2 items). All items are quoted from 1 to 5. Three items, related to questions posed negatively (Q3, Q4 and Q26), must be reversed (the calculation implies the subtraction of their value to six units). The results are transformed on a scale of 0 to 100. Each domain score is computed through the formula: \[(sum of all items - number of items) / (4x number of items)\] x 100. Higher scores correspond to better quality of life.
INTERVENTION group - M1: baseline (beginning of the study); M2: 4 weeks after the intervention and M3: 16 weeks after intervention. CONTROL group - M1: baseline; M2: 4 weeks after enrollment and M3: 16 weeks after enrollment.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Changes on family impact
INTERVENTION group - M1: baseline (beginning of the study); M2: 4 weeks after the intervention and M3: 16 weeks after intervention. CONTROL group - M1: baseline; M2 4 weeks after enrollment and M3 16 weeks after enrollment.
Changes on perception positive contributions
INTERVENTION group - M1: baseline ( beginning of the study); M2: 4 weeks after the intervention and M3: 16 weeks after intervention. CONTROL group - M1: baseline; M2: 4 weeks after enrollment and M3: 16 weeks after enrollment.
Study Arms (2)
INTERVENTION group (I)
EXPERIMENTALGroup I will be composed by parents of children with the diagnosis of CHD who will receive a psychoeducational intervention plus usual routines of the Service.
CONTROL group (C)
NO INTERVENTIONGroup C will be composed by parents of children with the diagnosis of CHD who will receive the usual routines of the Service. After completing the data collection, the possibility of receiving the psychoeducational intervention under study will be offered to this group.
Interventions
The intervention, prepared by a multidisciplinary team, will consist of two 90 minutes collective sessions (max. 8 families). Sessions will consist of lectures, group discussion and relaxation. The program includes content on the effects of a diagnosis of a congenital anomaly on a child in the parents and in the family, stages of mourning, adaptation process, coping strategies, legislative framework and social protection. This is a non-specific intervention for CHD, where the main focus is the diagnosis of a congenital anomaly. In second session, written support material will be distributed. Participants will be asked to practice relaxation in the next 4 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Parents of newborns (up to 28 days) with the diagnosis of non-syndromic CHD;
- Newborns hospitalized in CHUSJ;
- Parents aged ≥ 18 years.
You may not qualify if:
- Parents of newborns with other important comorbidities associated with CHD;
- Parents who do not have good understanding and expression in Portuguese.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João
Porto, 4200-319, Portugal
Related Publications (1)
Rodrigues MG, Rodrigues JD, Moreira JA, Clemente F, Dias CC, Azevedo LF, Rodrigues PP, Areias JC, Areias ME. A randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of psychoeducation on the quality of life of parents with children with congenital heart defects-Quantitative component. Child Care Health Dev. 2024 Jan;50(1):e13199. doi: 10.1111/cch.13199. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
PMID: 37967565DERIVED
Related Links
- Assessment methods and levels of quality of life of parents with children with congenital abnormalities - systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Psycho-educational interventions effectiveness to improve the quality of life of parents of children with congenital abnormalities - systematic review and meta-analysis - systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Impact of psycho-educational interventions in quality of life of parents of children with chronic diseases - systematic review and meta-analysis.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marisa Rodrigues, MD
Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde; Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto; Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João
- STUDY CHAIR
Maria Emília Areias, PhD
Instituto Universitário de Ciências da Saúde da Cooperativa do Ensino Superior, Politécnico e Universitário; Unidade de Investigação e Desenvolvimento Cardiovascular do Porto
- STUDY CHAIR
José Carlos Areias, PhD
Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto; Unidade de Investigação e Desenvolvimento Cardiovascular do Porto
- STUDY CHAIR
Pedro Pereira Rodrigues, PhD
Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde; Departamento de Medicina da Comunidade Informação e Decisão em Saúde; Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto
- STUDY CHAIR
Luís Filipe Azevedo, PhD
Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde; Departamento de Medicina da Comunidade Informação e Decisão em Saúde; Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 26, 2018
First Posted
October 30, 2018
Study Start
March 7, 2019
Primary Completion
February 28, 2020
Study Completion
February 28, 2020
Last Updated
September 16, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share