Congenital Heart Adolescents: Program of Transition Evaluation Research
CHAPTER
Evaluation of Novel Transition Interventions for Youth With Congenital Heart Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the potential role of a cardiology clinic-based educational intervention for 15 to 17 year olds with congenital heart disease (CHD) and their parents, and to determine whether this intervention results in improved self-management skills (e.g., renewing medication prescriptions), teens having greater knowledge of their heart condition, and more teen and parent satisfaction with services. The results of this study will form the basis for a website that in turn may serve as an additional means of providing transition interventions. The results of this study may also be applicable to youth with other special health care needs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2011
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 27, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 31, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 26, 2017
CompletedJune 26, 2017
June 1, 2017
2.8 years
January 27, 2011
December 13, 2016
June 23, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ) Score
The TRAQ is the most rigorously evaluated transition readiness questionnaire available and was developed in the USA. It has 29 items with two domains, self-management (16 items) and self-advocacy (13 ). The TRAQ is at a grade 5.7 reading level and uses a Likert scale. Each item is scored 1-5, with 1 being assigned for responses of "No, I do not know how" and a score of 5 assigned for responses of "Yes, I always do this when I need to." The TRAQ scores produced include an overall score and a subscale score. The overall score and the subscale scores are calculated simply by taking the average score across the items in the questionnaire (or subscale). The higher the score, the greater the perceived self-management or self-advocacy skills of the participant. The lower scores indicate the participant has a lower perceived level of self-management or self-advocacy.
Baseline, 1 month and 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
MyHeart Score
Baseline, 1 month and 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Clinic-based Educational Intervention
EXPERIMENTALThis will involve a 60 minute interaction between the teen and an advanced practice nurse (APN) in the cardiology clinic. A MyHealth passport will be created covering the name of the teen's cardiac condition, previous cardiac interventions, and name and purpose of the teen's medications. Potential late cardiac complications and contact names and location of local adult CHD cardiologists will also be reviewed. Three scenarios regarding adolescent risk taking behaviors (written in the 3rd person) will be presented to the teen who will be asked what advice he/she would offer to the teen in each of those scenarios. The teen will be given a study email address and encouraged to contact the APN by email or text messaging with follow-up questions. If no contact is initiated after 1 week, the APN will email or text (based on preference) the youth, to discuss additional questions.
Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONYouth seen in the Cardiology clinic see a nurse only to measure weight, height, and blood pressure. They rely on their cardiologist for information about their heart condition. The approach and amount of time taken by each cardiologist with a youth varies. Time-pressured clinic visits limit the opportunity to discuss many of the topics noted above.
Interventions
This will involve a 60 minute interaction between the teen and an advanced practice nurse (APN) in the cardiology clinic. A MyHealth passport will be created covering the name of the teen's cardiac condition, previous cardiac interventions, and name and purpose of the teen's medications. Potential late cardiac complications and contact names and location of local adult CHD cardiologists will also be reviewed. Three scenarios regarding adolescent risk taking behaviors (written in the 3rd person) will be presented to the teen who will be asked what advice he/she would offer to the teen in each of those scenarios. The teen will be given a study email address and encouraged to contact the APN by email or text messaging with follow-up questions. If no contact is initiated after 1 week, the APN will email or text (based on preference) the youth, to discuss additional questions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 15-17
- Followed in the Stollery Pediatric Cardiology Clinic or the Northern Alberta Adult Congenital (NAACH) clinic
- Moderate or Complex Congenital Heart Disease (as defined by the 2001 Bethesda guidelines) or Acquired Heart Disease (cardiomyopathy (dilated, hypertrophic, or restrictive forms), Marfan's syndrome or rheumatic heart disease with cardiac involvement)
You may not qualify if:
- Developmental Delay, reading level below grade 6 based on patient or parent report
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Stollery Children's Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
Related Publications (3)
Sawicki GS, Lukens-Bull K, Yin X, Demars N, Huang IC, Livingood W, Reiss J, Wood D. Measuring the transition readiness of youth with special healthcare needs: validation of the TRAQ--Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire. J Pediatr Psychol. 2011 Mar;36(2):160-71. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp128. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
PMID: 20040605BACKGROUNDWarnes CA, Liberthson R, Danielson GK, Dore A, Harris L, Hoffman JI, Somerville J, Williams RG, Webb GD. Task force 1: the changing profile of congenital heart disease in adult life. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Apr;37(5):1170-5. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01272-4. No abstract available.
PMID: 11300418BACKGROUNDMackie AS, Islam S, Magill-Evans J, Rankin KN, Robert C, Schuh M, Nicholas D, Vonder Muhll I, McCrindle BW, Yasui Y, Rempel GR. Healthcare transition for youth with heart disease: a clinical trial. Heart. 2014 Jul;100(14):1113-8. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305748. Epub 2014 May 19.
PMID: 24842870RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
1. single centre trial 2. most interventions were conducted by a single nurse 3. assessed self-management behaviours based on self-report 4. long-term follow-up and attendance in an adult cardiac clinic were not assessed
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Andrew Mackie
- Organization
- University of Alberta
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrew S Mackie, MD, SM
University of Alberta
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2011
First Posted
January 31, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
November 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
June 26, 2017
Results First Posted
June 26, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share