Investigation of Oxidative Stress in Appendectomy - Open Versus Laparoscopic in Childhood and Adolescence
OSAE
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In the planned prospective randomized study, oxidative stress will be investigated by analyzing volatile organic compounds in the exhaled air in children. Children who have undergone open versus laparoscopic surgery for appendicitis will be compared. A better understanding of the effects of the surgical technique could be a prerequisite for an optimized surgical setting. It could also lead to recommendations for pre- or perioperatively antioxidative agents.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 10, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 29, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 2, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedJuly 15, 2020
July 1, 2020
1 year
July 10, 2018
July 13, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Are volatile respiratory gas markers for oxidative stress (such as pentanes, isoprenes) dependent on the surgical method (open versus laparoscopic appendectomy)?
We investigate the respiratory volatile organic compounds before, during and at the end of surgery and compare the respiratory gas profiles of the two groups open versus laparoscopic appendectomy.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Alterations of serum malondialdehyde serum levels.
1 year
Alterations of inflammation markers.
1 year
Study Arms (2)
OAE group
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll patients will undergo measurements of oxydative stress (initial serum malondialdehyde level and final serum malondialdehyde level), White blood cell count (initial differential white blood cell count and final differential white blood cell count), c-reactive protein measurements (initial c-reactive protein serum level and final c-reactive protein serum level) as well as volatile organic compound (VOC) sampling (initial VOC, VOC 5min, VOC 15min, VOC 30min, VOC 45min and final VOC).
LAE group
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll patients will undergo measurements of oxydative stress (initial serum malondialdehyde level and final serum malondialdehyde level), White blood cell count (initial differential white blood cell count and final differential white blood cell count), c-reactive protein measurements (initial c-reactive protein serum level and final c-reactive protein serum level) as well as volatile organic compound (VOC) sampling (initial VOC, VOC 5min, VOC 15min, VOC 30min, VOC 45min and final VOC).
Interventions
Blood sample (0.4ml) will be obtained within 5 minutes before induction of general anaesthesia. Samples will be obtained in both groups (LAE and OAE)
Blood sample (0.4ml) will be obtained within 5 minutes after wound closure. Samples will be obtained in both groups (LAE and OAE)
Differential blood counts (microscopic) will be obtained during pre-operative routine work-up. Samples will be obtained in both groups (LAE and OAE).
Differential blood counts (microscopic) will be obtained 24h after the first sample (Initial differential blood count). Samples will be obtained in both groups (LAE and OAE).
C-reactive protein levels will be obtained during pre-operative routine work-up. Samples will be obtained in both groups (LAE and OAE).
C-reactive protein levels will be obtained 24h after the first sample (initial c-reactive protein level). Samples will be obtained in both groups (LAE and OAE).
Volatile organic compound sampling (2 samples within 5 minutes) within 10 minutes before induction of general anesthesia
Volatile organic compound sampling (2 samples within5 minutes) within 5 minutes after endotracheal intubation before skin incision.
Volatile organic compound sampling (2 samples within 5 minutes) 15 minutes after skin incision.
Volatile organic compound sampling (2 samples within 5 minutes) 30 minutes after skin incision.
Volatile organic compound sampling (2 samples within 5 minutes) 45 minutes after skin incision.
Volatile organic compound sampling (2 samples within 5 minutes) within 5 minutes after skin closure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age from 6-18 years
- reliable diagnosis of acute appendicitis
- surgical therapy using open/laparoscopic surgical technique
- given approval
You may not qualify if:
- Age not between 6 and 18 years
- chronic underlying disease/autoimmune disease
- complicated appendicitis (perforation, consecutive purulent peritonitis, abscess formation)
- infection outside acute appendicitis
- SIRS
- taking medications containing the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system affect including cortisone
- impaired liver function
- unaccepted consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medical University of Grazlead
- University of Rostockcollaborator
- Graz University of Technologycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Surgery
Graz, 8036, Austria
Related Publications (27)
Stringer MD. Acute appendicitis. J Paediatr Child Health. 2017 Nov;53(11):1071-1076. doi: 10.1111/jpc.13737. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
PMID: 29044790BACKGROUNDOhmann C, Franke C, Kraemer M, Yang Q. [Status report on epidemiology of acute appendicitis]. Chirurg. 2002 Aug;73(8):769-76. doi: 10.1007/s00104-002-0512-7. German.
PMID: 12425152BACKGROUNDGorter RR, Eker HH, Gorter-Stam MA, Abis GS, Acharya A, Ankersmit M, Antoniou SA, Arolfo S, Babic B, Boni L, Bruntink M, van Dam DA, Defoort B, Deijen CL, DeLacy FB, Go PM, Harmsen AM, van den Helder RS, Iordache F, Ket JC, Muysoms FE, Ozmen MM, Papoulas M, Rhodes M, Straatman J, Tenhagen M, Turrado V, Vereczkei A, Vilallonga R, Deelder JD, Bonjer J. Diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis. EAES consensus development conference 2015. Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4668-4690. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5245-7. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
PMID: 27660247BACKGROUNDBinnebosel M, Otto J, Stumpf M, Mahnken AH, Gassler N, Schumpelick V, Truong S. [Acute appendicitis. Modern diagnostics--surgical ultrasound]. Chirurg. 2009 Jul;80(7):579-87. doi: 10.1007/s00104-009-1684-1. German.
PMID: 19471900BACKGROUNDKim M, Kim SJ, Cho HJ. International normalized ratio and serum C-reactive protein are feasible markers to predict complicated appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Jun 21;11:31. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0081-6. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27330547BACKGROUNDSvensson JF, Hall NJ, Eaton S, Pierro A, Wester T. A review of conservative treatment of acute appendicitis. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Jun;22(3):185-94. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1320014. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
PMID: 22767171BACKGROUNDBlakely ML, Williams R, Dassinger MS, Eubanks JW 3rd, Fischer P, Huang EY, Paton E, Culbreath B, Hester A, Streck C, Hixson SD, Langham MR Jr. Early vs interval appendectomy for children with perforated appendicitis. Arch Surg. 2011 Jun;146(6):660-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.6. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
PMID: 21339413BACKGROUNDWhyte C, Levin T, Harris BH. Early decisions in perforated appendicitis in children: lessons from a study of nonoperative management. J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Aug;43(8):1459-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.11.032.
PMID: 18675635BACKGROUNDLi X, Zhang J, Sang L, Zhang W, Chu Z, Li X, Liu Y. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov 3;10:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-129.
PMID: 21047410BACKGROUNDCoccolini F, Trana C, Sartelli M, Catena F, Di Saverio S, Manfredi R, Montori G, Ceresoli M, Falcone C, Ansaloni L. Laparoscopic management of intra-abdominal infections: Systematic review of the literature. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Aug 27;7(8):160-9. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i8.160.
PMID: 26328036BACKGROUNDCiftci F. Laparoscopic vs mini-incision open appendectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Oct 27;7(10):267-72. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i10.267.
PMID: 26525039BACKGROUNDNoviello C, Romano M, Martino A, Cobellis G. Transumbilical Laparoscopic-Assisted Appendectomy in the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis in Children. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:949162. doi: 10.1155/2015/949162. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
PMID: 26491433BACKGROUNDKhan SY, Al-Balushi ZN, Bhatti KM, Ehsan T, Mandhan P. Cost Comparison between Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomies in Children. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2013 May;13(2):275-9. doi: 10.12816/0003234. Epub 2013 May 9.
PMID: 23862034BACKGROUNDZelzer S, Oberreither R, Bernecker C, Stelzer I, Truschnig-Wilders M, Fauler G. Measurement of total and free malondialdehyde by gas-chromatography mass spectrometry--comparison with high-performance liquid chromatography methology. Free Radic Res. 2013 Aug;47(8):651-6. doi: 10.3109/10715762.2013.812205. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
PMID: 23745592BACKGROUNDMcCrum-Gardner E. Which is the correct statistical test to use? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Jan;46(1):38-41. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2007.09.002. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
PMID: 17961892BACKGROUNDKapischke M, Pries A, Caliebe A. Short term and long term results after open vs. laparoscopic appendectomy in childhood and adolescence: a subgroup analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2013 Oct 1;13:154. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-154.
PMID: 24079822RESULTJaschinski T, Mosch C, Eikermann M, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr 15;15:48. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0277-3.
PMID: 25884671RESULTMinutolo V, Licciardello A, Di Stefano B, Arena M, Arena G, Antonacci V. Outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis: 4-years experience in a district hospital. BMC Surg. 2014 Mar 19;14:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-14.
PMID: 24646120RESULTTsai CC, Lee SY, Huang FC. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in the management of all stages of acute appendicitis in children: a retrospective study. Pediatr Neonatol. 2012 Oct;53(5):289-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
PMID: 23084720RESULTStipancic I, Zarkovic N, Servis D, Sabolovic S, Tatzber F, Busic Z. Oxidative stress markers after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2005 Aug;15(4):347-52. doi: 10.1089/lap.2005.15.347.
PMID: 16108734RESULTJakimowicz J, Stultiens G, Smulders F. Laparoscopic insufflation of the abdomen reduces portal venous flow. Surg Endosc. 1998 Feb;12(2):129-32. doi: 10.1007/s004649900612.
PMID: 9479726RESULTBaysal Z, Togrul T, Aksoy N, Cengiz M, Celik H, Boleken ME, Kaya M, Yavuz G. Evaluation of total oxidative and antioxidative status in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Jul;44(7):1367-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.11.031.
PMID: 19573663RESULTAktimur R, Gokakin AK, Deveci K, Atabey M, Topcu O. Oxidative stress markers in laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: A double-blind randomized study. J Minim Access Surg. 2016 Apr-Jun;12(2):143-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.156203.
PMID: 27073307RESULTSchubert JK, Miekisch W, Geiger K, Noldge-Schomburg GF. Breath analysis in critically ill patients: potential and limitations. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2004 Sep;4(5):619-29. doi: 10.1586/14737159.4.5.619.
PMID: 15347256RESULTMiekisch W, Schubert JK, Noeldge-Schomburg GF. Diagnostic potential of breath analysis--focus on volatile organic compounds. Clin Chim Acta. 2004 Sep;347(1-2):25-39. doi: 10.1016/j.cccn.2004.04.023.
PMID: 15313139RESULTPabst F, Miekisch W, Fuchs P, Kischkel S, Schubert JK. Monitoring of oxidative and metabolic stress during cardiac surgery by means of breath biomarkers: an observational study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Sep 18;2:37. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-2-37.
PMID: 17877828RESULTTrefz P, Rosner L, Hein D, Schubert JK, Miekisch W. Evaluation of needle trap micro-extraction and automatic alveolar sampling for point-of-care breath analysis. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2013 Apr;405(10):3105-15. doi: 10.1007/s00216-013-6781-9. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
PMID: 23388692RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Holger Till, MD
Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Surgery, Medical University of Graz
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gert Warncke, MD
Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- After obtaining written informed consent from patients/legal guardians the patients will be randomized 1:1 to one of the two surgical techniques. Randomization is carried out using the web-based "Randomizer for Clinical Trials" program at the Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation at the Medical University of Graz (www.randomizer.at).
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 10, 2018
First Posted
October 29, 2018
Study Start
October 2, 2019
Primary Completion
October 1, 2020
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
July 15, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share