NCT03720184

Brief Summary

Haemo-autologous Antegrade Repriming (HAR) is a procedure based in the combination of evidence proven measures designed to reduce the haemodilution caused by establishing the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) during cardiac surgery. This clinical trial aims to determinate, in one hand, the benefits related to HAR in terms of transfusion, ICU stay, ventilation time, early mortality and complications. In the other hand analyzes the gaseous microemboli (GME) load, comparing the oxygenators venting technology´s efficiency in treatment and control group, and its relation with patient´s neurocognitive status.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
116

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 15, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 18, 2018

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 25, 2018

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2019

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 9, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

February 12, 2021

Status Verified

February 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

October 18, 2018

Last Update Submit

February 9, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Retrograde autologous primingRAPHARcardiopulmonary bypassExtracorporeal circulationGaseous microemboliperfusion

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Transfusion

    Blood product consumption during patients hospital stay

    1 year

  • ICU stay

    Length of stay at Intensive Care Unit. (days)

    1 year

  • Ventilation time

    Hours under mechanical ventilation after surgery

    1 year

  • Complications

    Incidence of neurological, respiratory, urinary, cardiologic complications and multiorganic failure

    1 year

  • Mortality

    Incidence of death during hospital stay

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Emboli number

    1 year

  • Emboli Volume

    1 year

  • Emotional regulation

    6 months after surgery

  • Visual work memory variation and emboli

    6 months after surgery

  • Executive functions and emboli

    6 months after surgery

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

HAR group

EXPERIMENTAL

Treated group is exposed to an haematic antegrade autologous repriming of the MiECC CLass IV circuit, reducing the haemodilution related to CPB initiation to a fix amount of 300ml

Procedure: HAR

Control Group

NO INTERVENTION

Control group is not exposed to HAR. The extracorporeal circuit is a MiECC primed with 1000ml of Isofundin (crystalloid balanced solution) as an standard circuit

Interventions

HARPROCEDURE

HAR, the 6 steps procedure that results in 300ml of haemodilution. Step 0: Circuit is primed with 1000ml of crystalloid solution. Step 1: Venous line content is drained to the reservoir. Step 2: arterial srystalloid priming is displaced to the reservoir retrogradely by autologous blood. Step 3: Crystalloid priming is discarded to the collector bag. Step 4: An amount of 300ml of arterial blood is sequestered to the reservoir avoiding the mixture. Step 5: The centrifugal pump and the oxygenator are reprimed with autologous blood displacing the priming and GME to the collector bag. Step 6: CPB is initiated with a low haemodilution of 300ml. Available at: https://zenodo.org/record/4276132#.X7K8AchKgRk

Also known as: Haematic antegrade repriming, Extracorporeal circuit repriming
HAR group

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \- All patients purposed to undergo elective cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac valve surgery or other pathologies requiring to open heart chambers.

You may not qualify if:

  • Urgency and emergency
  • Heart transplantations
  • Severe cognitive affection
  • Active sepsis
  • Previous anemia
  • Early re-intervention
  • Pre-Op extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support
  • Hemodynamic unstability during HAR
  • Any clinical condition that may force protocol deviation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Clinico universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca

Murcia, MU, 30011, Spain

Location

Related Publications (14)

  • Loor G, Rajeswaran J, Li L, Sabik JF 3rd, Blackstone EH, McCrae KR, Koch CG. The least of 3 evils: exposure to red blood cell transfusion, anemia, or both? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Dec;146(6):1480-1487.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.06.033. Epub 2013 Aug 30.

    PMID: 23998782BACKGROUND
  • Liu YH, Wang DX, Li LH, Wu XM, Shan GJ, Su Y, Li J, Yu QJ, Shi CX, Huang YN, Sun W. The effects of cardiopulmonary bypass on the number of cerebral microemboli and the incidence of cognitive dysfunction after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Anesth Analg. 2009 Oct;109(4):1013-22. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181aed2bb.

    PMID: 19762724BACKGROUND
  • Wang S, Undar A. Vacuum-assisted venous drainage and gaseous microemboli in cardiopulmonary bypass. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2008 Dec;40(4):249-56.

    PMID: 19192754BACKGROUND
  • Evered L, Scott DA, Silbert B, Maruff P. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction is independent of type of surgery and anesthetic. Anesth Analg. 2011 May;112(5):1179-85. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318215217e. Epub 2011 Apr 7.

    PMID: 21474666BACKGROUND
  • Zhang X, Yan X, Gorman J, Hoffman SN, Zhang L, Boscarino JA. Perioperative hyperglycemia is associated with postoperative neurocognitive disorders after cardiac surgery. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014 Feb 19;10:361-70. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S57761. eCollection 2014.

    PMID: 24570589BACKGROUND
  • Segers T, Stehouwer MC, de Somer FMJJ, de Mol BA, Versluis M. Optical verification and in-vitro characterization of two commercially available acoustic bubble counters for cardiopulmonary bypass systems. Perfusion. 2018 Jan;33(1):16-24. doi: 10.1177/0267659117722595. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

    PMID: 28766987BACKGROUND
  • Lazar RM, Pavol MA, Bormann T, Dwyer MG, Kraemer C, White R, Zivadinov R, Wertheimer JC, Thone-Otto A, Ravdin LD, Naugle R, Mechanic-Hamilton D, Garmoe WS, Stringer AY, Bender HA, Kapadia SR, Kodali S, Ghanem A, Linke A, Mehran R, Virmani R, Nazif T, Parhizgar A, Leon MB. Neurocognition and Cerebral Lesion Burden in High-Risk Patients Before Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the SENTINEL Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 26;11(4):384-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.10.041. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

    PMID: 29397361BACKGROUND
  • Kurusz M, Butler BD. Bubbles and bypass: an update. Perfusion. 2004;19 Suppl 1:S49-55. doi: 10.1191/0267659104pf720oa.

    PMID: 15161064BACKGROUND
  • Vandewiele K, Bove T, De Somer FM, Dujardin D, Vanackere M, De Smet D, Moerman AT, Bouchez S, Francois K. The effect of retrograde autologous priming volume on haemodilution and transfusion requirements during cardiac surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Jun;16(6):778-83. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt085. Epub 2013 Mar 12.

  • Spellman T, Rigotti M, Ahmari SE, Fusi S, Gogos JA, Gordon JA. Hippocampal-prefrontal input supports spatial encoding in working memory. Nature. 2015 Jun 18;522(7556):309-14. doi: 10.1038/nature14445. Epub 2015 Jun 8.

  • De Somer FM, Vetrano MR, Van Beeck JP, Van Nooten GJ. Extracorporeal bubbles: a word of caution. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Jun;10(6):995-1001. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.229088. Epub 2010 Mar 2.

  • Basciani R, Kroninger F, Gygax E, Jenni H, Reineke D, Stucki M, Hagenbuch N, Carrel T, Eberle B, Erdoes G. Cerebral Microembolization During Aortic Valve Replacement Using Minimally Invasive or Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation: A Randomized Trial. Artif Organs. 2016 Dec;40(12):E280-E291. doi: 10.1111/aor.12744. Epub 2016 Jun 10.

  • Abrahamov D, Levran O, Naparstek S, Refaeli Y, Kaptson S, Abu Salah M, Ishai Y, Sahar G. Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption After Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Diagnosis and Correlation to Cognition. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Jul;104(1):161-169. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.10.043. Epub 2017 Feb 10.

  • Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservation Guideline Task Force; Ferraris VA, Brown JR, Despotis GJ, Hammon JW, Reece TB, Saha SP, Song HK, Clough ER; Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Special Task Force on Blood Transfusion; Shore-Lesserson LJ, Goodnough LT, Mazer CD, Shander A, Stafford-Smith M, Waters J; International Consortium for Evidence Based Perfusion; Baker RA, Dickinson TA, FitzGerald DJ, Likosky DS, Shann KG. 2011 update to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists blood conservation clinical practice guidelines. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Mar;91(3):944-82. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.11.078.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

AnemiaEmbolism, AirHeart Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesEmbolismEmbolism and ThrombosisVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Juan B Morillo, M.Sc

    IMIB. University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca. Murcia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Patient and neurocognitive examinator does not know the arm assigned, as well as the anaesthesiologist, surgeon and ICU team. Only the perfusionist has access to de randomization sheet before choosing and set up of the extracorporeal circuit. In order to guarantee the blinding, the perfusionist must be hidden during the possible HAR performance, using a field blanket to isolate the oxygenator´s area. Anestesiologist´s proceed in every case as if HAR is assigned maintaining a mean arterial pressure over 60 mmHg.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: In a preliminary phase, patients are randomly assigned to 4 branches, regarding to two conditions: oxygenator´s deairing type and HAR exposure. This phase is designed as pilot study with 100 patients in order to determine precisely the sample size needed depending on the observed effects. If there are no clinical differences between oxygenators behaviour, during the second stage, sample will be only divided in 2 groups due to HAR exposure.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2018

First Posted

October 25, 2018

Study Start

August 15, 2018

Primary Completion

September 1, 2019

Study Completion

February 9, 2021

Last Updated

February 12, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-02

Locations