Study Stopped
Surge of COVID-19 panedemic
Artificial Increase in Chest Wall Elastance as an Alternative to Prone Positioning in Moderate-to-severe ARDS.
ALTERPRONE
ArtificiaL Increase in chesT Wall Elastance as an alteRnative to PRONE Positioning in Moderate-to-severe ARDS: a Physiological Study The ALTERPRONE Study
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
During moderate to severe ARDS, sessions of prone positioning lead to lung and chest wall mechanics changes that modify regional ventilation, with a final redistribution of tidal volume and PEEP towards dependent lung regions: this limits ventilator-induced lung injury, increases oxygenation and convincingly improves clinical outcome. Physiological data indicate that the increase in chest wall elastance is crucial in determining the benefit by prone positioning on oxygenation. In some patients, however, prone positioning may not be feasible or safe due to particular comorbidities and/or technical issues. In the present pilot-feasibility study enrolling 15 subjects with moderate to severe ARDS in whom prone positioning is contraindicated or unfeasible, we aim at assessing whether and to what extent an artificial increase in chest wall elastance while the patient is in the supine position may yield a significant benefit to oxygenation. The increase in chest wall elastance will be achieved placing 100g/kg weight on the anterior chest wall of the patient while he/she is in the supine position: this approach previoulsy appeared safe and effective in case reports and small case series. Patient's position will be standardized (30 degrees head-up, semi seated position). This one-arm sequential study will evaluate the effects of the procedure on gas exchange, haemodynamics, lung and chest wall mechanics, alveolar recruitment (measured with the nitrogen washout-technique and multiple PV curves) and tidal volume and PEEP distribution (assessed with electrical impedance tomography).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 19, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 25, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2023
CompletedAugust 4, 2022
August 1, 2022
4.5 years
October 19, 2018
August 2, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
oxygenation
PaO2/FiO2 ratio
120 minutes after the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Alveolar recruitment
1 and 2 hours after the intervention
tidal volume dsitribution
1 and 2 hours after the intervention
Lung stress
1 and 2 hours after the intervention
Dynamic strain
1 and 2 hours after the intervention
Driving pressure
1 and 2 hours after the intervention
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
anterior chest wall weight
EXPERIMENTALmoderate to severe ARDS patients in whom prone positioning is contraindicated. Patients will have a 100 g/kg weight placed on the anterior chest wall, while in the supine/semirecumbant position. The weights will be placed on the patients' chest for 120 minutes, and then removed. A number of measurements will be recorded before and after the procedure.
Interventions
The investigators aim at assessing whether and to what extent an artificial increase in chest wall elastance, while the patient is in the supine position, may yield a significant benefit to oxygenation. The increase in chest wall elastance will be will be achieved placing a 100 g/kg weight on the anterior chest wall of the patient while he/she is in the supine/semirecumbant position. The weights will be placed on the patients' chest for 120 minutes, and then removed. A number of measurements will be recorded before and after the procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with ARDS and moderate to severe oxygenation impairment (PaO2/FiO2≤150 mmHg while receiving controlled mechanical ventilation with PEEP=5 cmH2O) will be the studied population.
- Acute respiratory failure within 1 week of a known clinical insult or new or worsening respiratory symptoms;
- Bilateral infiltrates at the chest x-ray or CT scan, not fully explained by effusions, lobar/lung collapse, or nodules;
- Respiratory failure not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload; objective assessment required to exclude hydrostatic edema if no risk factor present.
- PaO2/FiO2 ratio\<150 mmHg after 30 mins - 1 hour of mechanical ventilation with PEEP=5 cmH2O(14).
- Written informed consent.
- Prone positioning deemed non-feasible by the attending clinician, or presence of at least one of the following absolute contraindications for prone positioning(5)
- Serious facial trauma or facial surgery during the previous 15 days
- Deep venous thrombosis treated for less than 2 days
- Unstable spine, femur, or pelvic fractures
- Pregnant women
- Intracranial pressure \>30 mm Hg or cerebral perfusion pressure \<60 mm
You may not qualify if:
- Chest trauma
- Cardiothoracic surgery in the last 4/6 weeks
- Cardiac PM inserted the last 2 days
- Haemodynamic instability (MAP \< 65 mmHg despite vasoactive/inotrope support)
- Chest tube with air leaks
- Presence of intrinsic PEEP \> 1 cmH2O
- BMI \< 18
- Height \< 150 cm
- More than 48 hours from endotracheal intubation to the time of randomization
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
General ICU, A. Gemelli hospital
Rome, 00100, Italy
Related Publications (18)
Laffey JG, Bellani G, Pham T, Fan E, Madotto F, Bajwa EK, Brochard L, Clarkson K, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, van Haren F, Heunks LM, Kurahashi K, Laake JH, Larsson A, McAuley DF, McNamee L, Nin N, Qiu H, Ranieri M, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Wrigge H, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A; LUNG SAFE Investigators and the ESICM Trials Group. Potentially modifiable factors contributing to outcome from acute respiratory distress syndrome: the LUNG SAFE study. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):1865-1876. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4571-5. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
PMID: 27757516RESULTAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801.
PMID: 10793162RESULTBriel M, Meade M, Mercat A, Brower RG, Talmor D, Walter SD, Slutsky AS, Pullenayegum E, Zhou Q, Cook D, Brochard L, Richard JC, Lamontagne F, Bhatnagar N, Stewart TE, Guyatt G. Higher vs lower positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2010 Mar 3;303(9):865-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.218.
PMID: 20197533RESULTPapazian L, Forel JM, Gacouin A, Penot-Ragon C, Perrin G, Loundou A, Jaber S, Arnal JM, Perez D, Seghboyan JM, Constantin JM, Courant P, Lefrant JY, Guerin C, Prat G, Morange S, Roch A; ACURASYS Study Investigators. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 16;363(12):1107-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005372.
PMID: 20843245RESULTGuerin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, Mercier E, Badet M, Mercat A, Baudin O, Clavel M, Chatellier D, Jaber S, Rosselli S, Mancebo J, Sirodot M, Hilbert G, Bengler C, Richecoeur J, Gainnier M, Bayle F, Bourdin G, Leray V, Girard R, Baboi L, Ayzac L; PROSEVA Study Group. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 6;368(23):2159-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103. Epub 2013 May 20.
PMID: 23688302RESULTPelosi P, Tubiolo D, Mascheroni D, Vicardi P, Crotti S, Valenza F, Gattinoni L. Effects of the prone position on respiratory mechanics and gas exchange during acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Feb;157(2):387-93. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.2.97-04023.
PMID: 9476848RESULTGattinoni L, Pelosi P, Vitale G, Pesenti A, D'Andrea L, Mascheroni D. Body position changes redistribute lung computed-tomographic density in patients with acute respiratory failure. Anesthesiology. 1991 Jan;74(1):15-23. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199101000-00004.
PMID: 1986640RESULTSamanta S, Samanta S, Soni KD. Supine chest compression: alternative to prone ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 May;32(5):489.e5-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.11.014. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
PMID: 24332252RESULTMentzelopoulos SD, Roussos C, Zakynthinos SG. Prone position reduces lung stress and strain in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Eur Respir J. 2005 Mar;25(3):534-44. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00105804.
PMID: 15738300RESULTDellamonica J, Lerolle N, Sargentini C, Beduneau G, Di Marco F, Mercat A, Richard JC, Diehl JL, Mancebo J, Rouby JJ, Lu Q, Bernardin G, Brochard L. PEEP-induced changes in lung volume in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Two methods to estimate alveolar recruitment. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Oct;37(10):1595-604. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2333-y. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
PMID: 21866369RESULTRanieri VM, Giuliani R, Fiore T, Dambrosio M, Milic-Emili J. Volume-pressure curve of the respiratory system predicts effects of PEEP in ARDS: "occlusion" versus "constant flow" technique. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Jan;149(1):19-27. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.149.1.8111581.
PMID: 8111581RESULTRiera J, Perez P, Cortes J, Roca O, Masclans JR, Rello J. Effect of high-flow nasal cannula and body position on end-expiratory lung volume: a cohort study using electrical impedance tomography. Respir Care. 2013 Apr;58(4):589-96. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02086.
PMID: 23050520RESULTMauri T, Yoshida T, Bellani G, Goligher EC, Carteaux G, Rittayamai N, Mojoli F, Chiumello D, Piquilloud L, Grasso S, Jubran A, Laghi F, Magder S, Pesenti A, Loring S, Gattinoni L, Talmor D, Blanch L, Amato M, Chen L, Brochard L, Mancebo J; PLeUral pressure working Group (PLUG-Acute Respiratory Failure section of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine). Esophageal and transpulmonary pressure in the clinical setting: meaning, usefulness and perspectives. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Sep;42(9):1360-73. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4400-x. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
PMID: 27334266RESULTGattinoni L, Caironi P, Cressoni M, Chiumello D, Ranieri VM, Quintel M, Russo S, Patroniti N, Cornejo R, Bugedo G. Lung recruitment in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2006 Apr 27;354(17):1775-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052052.
PMID: 16641394RESULTMuders T, Luepschen H, Zinserling J, Greschus S, Fimmers R, Guenther U, Buchwald M, Grigutsch D, Leonhardt S, Putensen C, Wrigge H. Tidal recruitment assessed by electrical impedance tomography and computed tomography in a porcine model of lung injury*. Crit Care Med. 2012 Mar;40(3):903-11. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318236f452.
PMID: 22202705RESULTPelosi P, Brazzi L, Gattinoni L. Prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Eur Respir J. 2002 Oct;20(4):1017-28. doi: 10.1183/09031936.02.00401702.
PMID: 12412699RESULTPelosi P, Cereda M, Foti G, Giacomini M, Pesenti A. Alterations of lung and chest wall mechanics in patients with acute lung injury: effects of positive end-expiratory pressure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Aug;152(2):531-7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.152.2.7633703.
PMID: 7633703RESULTBlankman P, Hasan D, Erik G, Gommers D. Detection of 'best' positive end-expiratory pressure derived from electrical impedance tomography parameters during a decremental positive end-expiratory pressure trial. Crit Care. 2014 May 10;18(3):R95. doi: 10.1186/cc13866.
PMID: 24887391RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Massimo Antonelli, MD
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of the department of Anesthesia and Intensive care medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 19, 2018
First Posted
October 25, 2018
Study Start
October 1, 2018
Primary Completion
April 1, 2023
Study Completion
April 1, 2023
Last Updated
August 4, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08