En-bloc vs Conventional Resection of Primary Bladder Tumor
eBLOC
1 other identifier
interventional
384
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Based on current evidence, we hypothesize that eTURB represents an improvement in the surgical management of NMIBC. The resection is more precise and complete compared to cTURB. Moreover, the quality of an en-bloc specimen, including the tumor with its adjacent bladder wall layers, allows an accurate pathological review which leads to correct risk allocation and therapy. To answer these questions, we designed a RCT comparing eTURB with cTURB. Primary outcome of our study will be the accuracy of pathological staging assessment measured by the presence of detrusor muscle in the specimen as a surrogate parameter for quality of resection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Feb 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 23, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 24, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 28, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 20, 2021
CompletedMarch 16, 2023
March 1, 2023
1.9 years
October 23, 2018
March 14, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The pathological staging assessment for eTURB compared to cTURB
The primary objective of the study is to assess whether eBLOC is associated with a higher rate of detrusor muscle in the pathologic specimen, compared to cTURB
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Residual disease within 3 months after initial TURB
3 months
Occurrence of obturator reflex
1 day
Operative time
1 day
Number of participants with bladder perforation
7 days
Upstaging of disease upon second look transurethral resection surgery
6 weeks
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
En-Bloc TURB
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional TURB
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
En-bloc resection will be performed at each center based on local clinical practice and available instruments. Laser resection, hydrodissection with HybridKnife® or electric resection are allowed. All procedures, including cTURB, must be performed with an imaging enhancing technique (PDD / NBI at surgeon's discretion). After resection, a single intravesical instillation of 40mg Mitomycin-C will be performed if clinically feasible.
En-bloc resection will be performed at each center based on local clinical practice and available instruments. After resection, a single intravesical instillation of 40mg Mitomycin-C will be performed if clinically feasible.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis by cystoscopy of primary papillary non-muscle invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma (cTa, cT1)
- Imaging examinations shows that the bladder muscle has not been affected, no lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis;
- Diameter of tumor between 1cm and 3cm
- Number of lesions ≤3 (The position of small lesions relatively concentrated as one place)
- Patients who agree to eTURB or cTURB surgery, and will be effected to the postoperative follow-up treatment such as conventional infusion after the operation
You may not qualify if:
- Pure carcinoma in situ
- Contraindications to surgery (i.e. bladder fibrosis)
- Diameter of tumor \>3cm
- Number of lesions \>3
- Poor performance status making a surgical intervention too risky
- Life expectancy of less than one year
- Patient refused to participate
- Pregnancy
- History of upper urinary tract malignancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- David D'Andrealead
Study Sites (1)
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, 1090, Austria
Related Publications (1)
D'Andrea D, Soria F, Hurle R, Enikeev D, Kotov S, Regnier S, Xylinas E, Lusuardi L, Heidenreich A, Cai C, Frego N, Taraktin M, Ryabov M, Gontero P, Comperat E, Shariat SF; eBLOC Study Team. En Bloc Versus Conventional Resection of Primary Bladder Tumor (eBLOC): A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol Oncol. 2023 Oct;6(5):508-515. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.07.010. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
PMID: 37543464DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Shahrokh Shariat, M.D.
Shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 23, 2018
First Posted
October 24, 2018
Study Start
February 28, 2019
Primary Completion
January 20, 2021
Study Completion
January 20, 2021
Last Updated
March 16, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share