NCT03718754

Brief Summary

Based on current evidence, we hypothesize that eTURB represents an improvement in the surgical management of NMIBC. The resection is more precise and complete compared to cTURB. Moreover, the quality of an en-bloc specimen, including the tumor with its adjacent bladder wall layers, allows an accurate pathological review which leads to correct risk allocation and therapy. To answer these questions, we designed a RCT comparing eTURB with cTURB. Primary outcome of our study will be the accuracy of pathological staging assessment measured by the presence of detrusor muscle in the specimen as a surrogate parameter for quality of resection.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
384

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 23, 2018

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 24, 2018

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 28, 2019

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 20, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 20, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

March 16, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

October 23, 2018

Last Update Submit

March 14, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The pathological staging assessment for eTURB compared to cTURB

    The primary objective of the study is to assess whether eBLOC is associated with a higher rate of detrusor muscle in the pathologic specimen, compared to cTURB

    4 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Residual disease within 3 months after initial TURB

    3 months

  • Occurrence of obturator reflex

    1 day

  • Operative time

    1 day

  • Number of participants with bladder perforation

    7 days

  • Upstaging of disease upon second look transurethral resection surgery

    6 weeks

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

En-Bloc TURB

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Device: En-Bloc TURB

Conventional TURB

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Device: Conventional TURB

Interventions

En-bloc resection will be performed at each center based on local clinical practice and available instruments. Laser resection, hydrodissection with HybridKnife® or electric resection are allowed. All procedures, including cTURB, must be performed with an imaging enhancing technique (PDD / NBI at surgeon's discretion). After resection, a single intravesical instillation of 40mg Mitomycin-C will be performed if clinically feasible.

En-Bloc TURB

En-bloc resection will be performed at each center based on local clinical practice and available instruments. After resection, a single intravesical instillation of 40mg Mitomycin-C will be performed if clinically feasible.

Conventional TURB

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis by cystoscopy of primary papillary non-muscle invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma (cTa, cT1)
  • Imaging examinations shows that the bladder muscle has not been affected, no lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis;
  • Diameter of tumor between 1cm and 3cm
  • Number of lesions ≤3 (The position of small lesions relatively concentrated as one place)
  • Patients who agree to eTURB or cTURB surgery, and will be effected to the postoperative follow-up treatment such as conventional infusion after the operation

You may not qualify if:

  • Pure carcinoma in situ
  • Contraindications to surgery (i.e. bladder fibrosis)
  • Diameter of tumor \>3cm
  • Number of lesions \>3
  • Poor performance status making a surgical intervention too risky
  • Life expectancy of less than one year
  • Patient refused to participate
  • Pregnancy
  • History of upper urinary tract malignancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Medical University of Vienna

Vienna, 1090, Austria

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • D'Andrea D, Soria F, Hurle R, Enikeev D, Kotov S, Regnier S, Xylinas E, Lusuardi L, Heidenreich A, Cai C, Frego N, Taraktin M, Ryabov M, Gontero P, Comperat E, Shariat SF; eBLOC Study Team. En Bloc Versus Conventional Resection of Primary Bladder Tumor (eBLOC): A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol Oncol. 2023 Oct;6(5):508-515. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.07.010. Epub 2023 Aug 4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Shahrokh Shariat, M.D.

    Shahrokh.shariat@meduniwien.ac.at

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
M.D.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 23, 2018

First Posted

October 24, 2018

Study Start

February 28, 2019

Primary Completion

January 20, 2021

Study Completion

January 20, 2021

Last Updated

March 16, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations