NCT03717597

Brief Summary

This intervention is designed to promote enhanced use of compensation strategies including calendar and task list use, and organization systems, as well as increased engagement with brain health activities including physical exercise, cognitive activities, and stress reduction.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 26, 2018

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 15, 2018

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 24, 2018

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2020

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 10, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

February 3, 2022

Status Verified

February 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

May 15, 2018

Last Update Submit

February 1, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in compensation use

    Measured using the Everyday Compensation Questionnaire, a 54-item self-report questionnaire that asks participants how often they engage in a variety of activities that help them stay cognitively and physically active.

    baseline and 6 months follow up

  • Change in cognition

    Measured using the Everyday Cognition (ECog) scale, a self-rated questionnaire of cognitively-based everyday abilities. The ECog comprises of 39 items on which the participant's current level of everyday functioning is compared to 10 years earlier. Items are rated on a four-point scale: 1= better or no change compared to 10 years earlier; 4= consistently much worse. Higher scores indicate greater functional limitations.

    baseline and 6 months follow up

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Beck Depression Inventory

    baseline, immediately after intervention, and 3 and 6 month follow-up visits

  • Beck Anxiety Inventory

    baseline, immediately after intervention, and 3 and 6 month follow-up visits

  • List learning task

    baseline, immediately after intervention, and 3 and 6 month follow-up visits

  • Executive function task

    baseline, immediately after intervention, and 3 and 6 month follow-up visits

  • Psychomotor Speed Task

    baseline, immediately after intervention, and 3 and 6 month follow-up visits

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will complete an initial assessment within 2 weeks prior to starting the course or during the first class. The course will include 10 sessions conducted on a weekly basis. Following completion of the course, participants will again complete another assessment during the last class or within 2 weeks of course completion. Participants may be invited to complete assessments at 3- and 6-months following course completion.

Behavioral: Intervention

Interventions

InterventionBEHAVIORAL

Subjects will attend a series of 2 hour classes, once a week for 10 weeks. Topics discussed in group sessions will cover compensation strategies (e.g., calendar, goal setting and task lists, functional zones) and brain health behaviors (e.g., exercise, cognitive activity, stress reduction and mindfulness). Subjects may be asked to wear an actigraphy monitor (that looks like a wrist watch) and/or heart rate sensor that is designed to collect information regarding physical activity.

Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • a diagnosis of subjective cognitive complaints (SCC)
  • Age 65+
  • English speaking
  • Available informant to complete surveys
  • Ambulatory

You may not qualify if:

  • Known neurological condition
  • Severe psychiatric illness (e.g., current depression)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of California Davis

Sacramento, California, 95816, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Tomaszewski Farias S, Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Weakley A, Harvey D, Denny KG, Barba C, Gravano JT, Giovannetti T, Willis S. Compensation Strategies in Older Adults: Association With Cognition and Everyday Function. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2018 May;33(3):184-191. doi: 10.1177/1533317517753361. Epub 2018 Jan 23.

    PMID: 29357670BACKGROUND
  • Farias ST, Lau K, Harvey D, Denny KG, Barba C, Mefford AN. Early Functional Limitations in Cognitively Normal Older Adults Predict Diagnostic Conversion to Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Jun;65(6):1152-1158. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14835. Epub 2017 Mar 17.

    PMID: 28306147BACKGROUND
  • Greenaway MC, Duncan NL, Smith GE. The memory support system for mild cognitive impairment: randomized trial of a cognitive rehabilitation intervention. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;28(4):402-9. doi: 10.1002/gps.3838. Epub 2012 Jun 7.

    PMID: 22678947BACKGROUND
  • Greenaway MC, Hanna SM, Lepore SW, Smith GE. A behavioral rehabilitation intervention for amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2008 Oct-Nov;23(5):451-61. doi: 10.1177/1533317508320352.

    PMID: 18955724BACKGROUND
  • Lau KM, Parikh M, Harvey DJ, Huang CJ, Farias ST. Early Cognitively Based Functional Limitations Predict Loss of Independence in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in Older Adults. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2015 Oct;21(9):688-98. doi: 10.1017/S1355617715000818. Epub 2015 Sep 22.

    PMID: 26391766BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Methods

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Investigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Michelle Chan, PhD

    University of California, Davis

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: While subjects will be enrolled in multiple groups, all subjects will receive the same intervention and will complete the same study activities.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2018

First Posted

October 24, 2018

Study Start

April 26, 2018

Primary Completion

December 31, 2020

Study Completion

December 10, 2021

Last Updated

February 3, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations