A Comparative Study Between Mechanical and a Viscoelastic Disc Prosthesis in the Lumbar Spine
A Randomized Controlled Study Between Mechanical and a Viscoelastic Disc Prosthesis in the Lumbar Spine. A Comparison on Clinical Outcome and Facet-joint Load Between Two Different TDR Designs.
1 other identifier
interventional
246
1 country
1
Brief Summary
TDR implants for the lumbar spine are currently most 2- or 3-piece devices with a purely mechanical function that provide/restore mobility. Lately interest is growing on non-mechanical implants that could possibly provide/restore mobility, but also produce counterforces on mobility as in healthy discs. No previous comparison between these two concepts has been performed, neither on clinical outcome, neither on specific differences on facet-joint load and wear.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 12, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 23, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedDecember 16, 2020
December 1, 2020
4.5 years
July 12, 2018
December 12, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient reported back pain after two years in Swespine national registry
GA (Global Assessment of back pain, patient-based evaluation of leg and back pain as compared to preoperatively,1-5, 1 disappeared and 5 worsened) ,collected from questionnaires
2, 5, 10 years
Secondary Outcomes (6)
VAS, Visual Analogue Scale
2, 5, 10 years
ODI, Oswestry disability index
2, 5, 10 years
EQ-5D, Health-related quality of life
2, 5, 10 years
Re-operation related to facet-joint arthritis
2, 5, 10 years
Facet-joint pathology prevalence
2, 5, 10 years
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
ORBIT Mechanical disc prosthesis
ACTIVE COMPARATORSurgical procedure with total disc replacement using mechanical disc prosthesis device, "ORBIT, Globus Medical"
ZACK viscoelastic disc prosthesis
EXPERIMENTALSurgical procedure with total disc replacement using viscoelastic disc prosthesis device, "ZACK, FH Orthopaedics"
ORBIT SASCA
ACTIVE COMPARATORSurgical procedure with total disc replacement (TDR) using ORBIT disc prostheses device combined with adjacent level anterior intracorporal fusion (ALIF) with intracorporal device SASCA.
ZACK SASCA
EXPERIMENTALSurgical procedure with total disc replacement (TDR) using ZACK disc prostheses device combined with adjacent level anterior intracorporal fusion (ALIF) with intracorporal device SASCA.
Interventions
Surgical procedure with total disc replacement using ZACK disc prostheses
Surgical procedure with total disc replacement using ORBIT disc prostheses
Surgical procedure with anterior intracorporal fusion (ALIF) combined with adjacent level total disc replacement (TDR) (using either ORBIT mechanical disc prosthesis or ZACK viscoelastic disc prosthesis)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Incapacitating pain from DDD (both clinical and radiological) in one or two segments below the L3 vertebra, were at least one segment is suitable for TDR treatment.
- Patient with more than one year of pain, that has during this period made a prolonged and adequate conservative program.
- Patient between 20 and 55 years of age. -
- Patient able to understand written and spoken Swedish.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient does not accept to be part of the study.
- Three or more segments suspected to be symptomatic.
- Earlier vertebral fracture, tumour, infection or fusion in the lumbar spine. -Substantial scoliosis/deformity.
- Need for posterior decompression.
- Pregnancy, psychiatric illness or drug abuse. -Patient does not understand written and spoken Swedish and can thus not take part in information and answer questionnaires.
- Patient residing outside Sweden and thus is not covered with SweSpine. -
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Stockholm Spine Center
Stockholm, Upplands Väsby, 194 89, Sweden
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Svante Berg, MD,PhD
Karolinska Institutet
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Senior Consultant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 12, 2018
First Posted
October 23, 2018
Study Start
February 1, 2018
Primary Completion
August 1, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
December 16, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share