NCT03715049

Brief Summary

Objective 1: To evaluate the effect and histologic (cellular) changes associated with varying energy and density settings of the Fraxel Repair Laser to determine an optimal dose response. Objective 2: To evaluate the clinical response associated with variable energy and density settings of fraxel laser treatment in the upper lip. Overall assessment of clinical outcome and safety will be based clinic visits and evaluation of pre- and post- procedural photos. The subject's assessment of satisfaction will be characterized using a non-parametric assessment scale at each follow-up period.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
35

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2013

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 30, 2014

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2017

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 22, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

October 22, 2018

Status Verified

October 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

4.4 years

First QC Date

April 30, 2014

Last Update Submit

October 19, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

upper lip wrinkles

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in the lip wrinkles from baseline to 1 month

    The primary outcome measure of effectiveness will be a paired comparison of baseline to 1, 3, and 6 month follow-up ratings for wrinkles using a Merz Aesthetic Lip Line score (0 none 1-4). Safety will be defined as an absence of hypopigmentary changes and by a restoration of hyperpigmentary changes to mild or less at 1 month. Photographs of treated skin at follow-up visits will be compared to baseline to document the healing time course and may be used for blinded scoring evaluations (0-9 scales) of wrinkles, skin texture and color changes. The investigator will grade the epidermal response including side effects and adverse events using the 0 to 10 grading scale.

    1 month

  • Change in lip wrinkle from baseline to 3 months

    The primary outcome measure of effectiveness will be a paired comparison of baseline to 3 months ratings for wrinkles using a Merz Aesthetic Lip Line score (0 none 1-4). Safety will be defined as an absence of hypopigmentary changes and by a restoration of hyperpigmentary changes to mild or less at 3 month. Photographs of treated skin at follow-up visits will be compared to baseline to document the healing time course and may be used for blinded scoring evaluations (0-9 scales) of wrinkles, skin texture and color changes. The investigator will grade the epidermal response including side effects and adverse events using the 0 to 10 grading scale.

    3 month

  • Change in the lip wrinkles from baseline to 6 month

    The primary outcome measure of effectiveness will be a paired comparison of baseline to 6 month follow-up ratings for wrinkles using a Merz Aesthetic Lip Line score (0 none 1-4). Safety will be defined as an absence of hypopigmentary changes and by a restoration of hyperpigmentary changes to mild or less at 6 month. Photographs of treated skin at follow-up visits will be compared to baseline to document the healing time course and may be used for blinded scoring evaluations (0-9 scales) of wrinkles, skin texture and color changes. The investigator will grade the epidermal response including side effects and adverse events using the 0 to 10 grading scale.

    6 month

Study Arms (1)

Fraxel Laser Treatment

OTHER

Using the energy and density settings within the FDA approved limits (5-40mJ at 30-100% density) that were narrowed down by the pre-clinical portion of the study, and analysis of abdominal and facial tissue treated in Objective 1, up to thirty (30) subjects will be recruited and treated one (1) time in the perioral region of the upper lip and followed for 6 months (study design below). The acute effects of the laser application will be determined by subjective analysis using the wrinkle severity scores.

Procedure: Fraxel Laser Treatment

Interventions

The device to be used in this study is a FDA approved device \[510(k) approval\] used for aesthetic dermatological procedures. The Fraxel Repair laser system utilizes a sealed off, all metal carbon dioxide gas tube that is radio frequency (RF) excited and air cooled, emitting light at a wavelength of 10.6 μm with programmable pulse duration and frequency. The Fraxel Repair laser has a continuous motion (rolling) optical tracking system. The Fraxel system consists of a treatment component and an internal control component. The treatment component consists of the laser delivery handpiece. A computer with a touch screen keyboard to enter subjects' information also provides controls for the fractionated delivery of the 10.6 μm beam.

Fraxel Laser Treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy male and female adults between 18-75 years of age.
  • Subjects who can read, understand, and sign the Informed Consent Form.
  • Subjects willing and able to comply with all study requirements.
  • Fitzpatrick skin type I-IV (Although the systems are cleared for all skin types I- VI, it is recommended to use the Matrix applicators on skin types I- V).

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects with active localized or systemic infections.
  • Immunocompromised subjects.
  • Subjects with coagulation disorder.
  • History of skin photo sensitivity disorders, or use of photosensitizing drugs (e.g., tetracycline or sulfa drugs).
  • Pregnant and/or lactating (All female volunteers will be advised about using birth control during the period of study).
  • In the opinion of the trained clinician, subject is unwilling or unable to adhere to all study requirements, including application and follow-up visits.
  • Use of Accutane® within the past 6 months.
  • Subjects with a history of radiation therapy to the treatment area.
  • Subject has a history of allergy to lidocaine or ester-based local anesthetics.
  • Subjects with any skin pathology or condition that could interfere with evaluation or with the use of typical ancillary medical treatments or care used before, during or after treatments.
  • Subjects have undergone dermatological procedures (e.g., laser or light treatments) for the treatment of wrinkles, skin resurfacing, or skin rejuvenation in the treatment area within 1 year of study participation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

UT Southwestern Medical Center Dept. of Plastic Surgery

Dallas, Texas, 75390-9132, United States

Location

Study Officials

  • Jeffrey M. Kenkel, MD

    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2014

First Posted

October 22, 2018

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion

December 1, 2017

Study Completion

December 1, 2017

Last Updated

October 22, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-10

Locations